The Rainbow, the Rules and the Rebirth

RSS Feed

The Rainbow, the Rules and the Rebirth

November 18th, 2015

Awake Goy

Under the penetrating light of scrutiny, we cannot deny that in some ways we humans are odd things.

Forever on the quest to understand the world around us and our place in it, we rationalize the solid into the abstract, constantly encapsulating, condensing and simplifying. By doing so we forge conceptual elements vital for our survival, such as tradition, custom, knowledge, and all manner of essentials.

Another product of abstraction that has been used all throughout the ages to define and simplify has been the symbol. As we all know, the symbol specifically hones in to represent and embody, acting as a type of conceptual shorthand.

Symbols have always played an important part in various institutions and movements of all kinds: spiritual, political, social, and revolutionary.

Being both potent yet simple, the symbol readily lends itself to the representation of concepts, beliefs, actions, or status: the Swastika, the Christian Cross, the skull and crossbones, a nation’s flag, and even certain verbal metaphors (e.g. the cradle of civilization, the wild west) – all of these are enduring and potent symbols.

The Rainbow

One element of nature that has featured considerably throughout the ages both in tradition and as a symbol is the rainbow. This is in no small part due to the phenomenon’s beauty in addition to its enigmatic nature.

Several examples of the rainbow in tradition include the burning rainbow bridge Bifröst in Norse tradition, the goddesses Iris in Greek mythology, the bow of Indra and the incarnation of Vishnu in Hindu tradition, and the secret location of the Irish leprechaun’s pot of gold.

In terms of symbols displayed on actual flags for social and political purposes that we see today, the rainbow is certainly one of the most familiar, with its representation of the LGBT movement being by far the most prominent in usage.

However there are other numerous political and social movements which have also utilized the rainbow design on their flags. These include such causes as the the Peace movement, Buddhism, the Andean indigenous pride movement, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in Russia, and Noahidism among others.

South Africa

As we now shift gears in our discussion of the symbolism of the rainbow, we find ourselves heading into a decidedly darker realm, in fact headlong into a corner of the Dark Continent itself: South Africa.

Although the phrase Dark Continent is now slipping into decreased usage in describing Africa, the term does illustrate in a very fitting way how South Africa is one of the models for where we as people of European descent are most definitely heading in our own lands, especially as events in Europe continue to unfold as they have been.

South Africa, the “Rainbow Nation” – a symbol in the form of a spoken metaphor meant to represent racial diversity and hope, which is also represented by the nation’s flag of six colours .

The “Rainbow Nation”. A catchy little marketing jingle for sure. Even without closing my eyes, I can picture the scene right now: colour, vibrance and vigour; an exotic paradise and utopia; multicultural enrichment.

But not so much for for white people.

After all, many South Africans have made it perfectly clear that there is “no white in the rainbow”.

While some white people in South Africa are given a platform by the Western media (even if not a voice), such as we’ve seen with the three-ring circus sideshow of Oscar Pistorius, others have not been so fortunate, such as the thousands of Afrikaner farmers who have been brutally tortured, mutilated, raped, and murdered over the years by gangs of vicious, savage beasts. No one is spared in these attacks, regardless of sex or age – not even young children.

Many of the Boer farmer victims have in fact suffered torture for hours, and in some cases even days, by these brutal subhuman animals.

“Official” sources put the number of Boer murders at 4,000 since the end of Apartheid in 1994, however the number is likely to be much higher than this, since many of these murders are not considered racially-motivated “hate crimes”, and are therefore not given any real priority over and above “ordinary” murders.

Nonetheless, working with the official figures still gives us a murder rate amongst the Boer farmers of four times that of the national average, and a staggering 22 times that of the international average.

According to the non-governmental organization Genocide Watch, the horrific desecration of the victims’ bodies often seen at these crime scenes is a clear indication of racial hatred being the key motivating factor. Genocide Watch sees this as early warning signs of white genocide hanging in the air in this part of the Dark Continent.

Up until December 2014, Genocide Watch had rated the white genocide danger level in South Africa at an alarming level of 6 on an 8-point scoring system. Level 6 refers to preparation to commit genocide, which is merely one level below that of the actual act of extermination itself at level 7 (with level 8 being the post-extermination stage of denial).

As of December 2014, however, the threat level has been returned back to level 5 (polarization). Polarization in this context essentially refers to anti-white extremism incited by black Marxist dogma.

The Rainbow Nation.

After all, there is “no white in the rainbow”. A wonderful little analogy, isn’t it? It just reeks of the left. I can just smell the stench as I read the phrase.

We of many cultures, languages and races have become one nation. We are the Rainbow People of God.”
– Desmond Tutu

Oh, yes. I can smell it again. That stench is from the left for sure. There’s no doubt about it.

Believe what you will about these catchy little phrases originating from Desmond Tutu or Nelson Mandela. Instinctively, most of us know only too well from which tribe these cleverly-crafted phrases come from, and it is not a tribe from Africa.

It is a tribe whose curriculum vitae reads as a catalogue of horrors, a tribe whose proxy battalions are always assembled and ready for action, be they the seemingly endless ranks of deluded leftist fools, corrupt politicians, or machete-wielding beasts.

. . . a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.”
– Nelson Mandela

The post-apartheid ANC, far from being anything akin to the coloured rays of hope that many had hoped for, has proved to be a farce and a failure, rotten to the core with corruption.

Despite all of the promises, the hype and the hope, the ANC has looked on as its BEE (Black Economic Empowerment) programs, ostensibly aimed at addressing inequalities by providing preferential opportunities for blacks, Indians and Chinese, have largely proven a failure. The ANC has also looked on with willful lethargy as the nation’s crime rate has spiraled right out of control.

South Africa is in fact a country edging closer and closer to the status of being a failed nation, and it all started back in 1994 after the end of apartheid.

Besides its crowning achievement as often being referred to as “the rape capital of the world” (and that involves rapes committed against adults, the elderly, children, and infants alike), South Africa also has horrific rates of murders, assaults, carjackings, and kidnappings.

Although statistics clearly show that Afrikaner farmers are being disproportionately targeted in these unimaginably savage attacks, and that organizations such as Genocide Watch confirm that anti-white hatred poses the very real threat of white genocide (at least in the context of the Afrikaner farmers), no racial group is immune from the tremendous levels of violent crime occurring in this country.

The depth and breadth of what is occurring in South Africa is simply beyond the scope of what this article can do justice to. But nonetheless here are just a couple of revealing little snippets:

Kill the Boer”
– Written on the walls of Helen and Alice Lotter’s farmhouse in their own blood in 2009 by Joseph Hlongwane, 22, who had tortured and murdered them

17,805 is a number I would expect from a country at war,”
– Dianne Kohler Barnard (South African shadow police minister, referring to the total number of murders in South Africa between April 2014 – March 2015)

Small wonder then that fortress-grade gated communities are favoured in South Africa.

And as for those who prefer to really play it safe, there is for some the option of leaving the country altogether. In fact, most who leave the country cite crime as being a major factor in their decision to emigrate elsewhere.

As one listens closely, the chorus to this song of discordance and dysfunction repeats itself once again:

. . . a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.”
– Nelson Mandela

Granted, Mandela did speak these words during his early days in office in 1994 before the real downward spiral had began to take hold, but overall, to be fair, these words ring as those spoken by a true communist aided and abetted by members of the tribe of cap-wearers. And I am not referring to the Zulus or the Xhosa.

The rainbow: the symbol versus the literal

The Rainbow Nation.

A romanticized notion. The promise of something that could never be delivered. In the end, the rainbow proved to be nothing more than an ugly grey outline camouflaged with some shoddy splashes of paint.

Camouflage and pretence – this is something the leftists and their cap-wearing tribalist overseers are masters at employing. While the tribalists do so because of their own destructive hardwired impulses, the leftists do so largely out of their own willful stupidity.

After all, it is far easier to pursue the path of least resistance and follow the throngs of likewise idiots around you than it is to display honesty and intellectual backbone when dealing with the hard facts of the real world.

Besides, who needs trivial, pesky little facts when it feels so good to be right all of the time?

Who needs logic or a coherent world view when your own self-righteous pomposity lets you mend all of the broken pieces of the world back together?

And out of all the symbols that the ANC communists and the leftists could have hijacked for their own poisoned ideologies, they had to choose the rainbow of all things, didn’t they?

Arguably the most stunningly beautiful optical phenomenon in nature. They just had to choose it, abuse it and ruin it, didn’t they?

May they be cursed!

But despite what these dullards demand of nature in order to fit in with their own selfish little agendas and fancies, in the end nature cannot be changed, swayed nor coerced, for she is forever set in her own inexorable ways.

And this principle is illustrated perfectly when we examine just how well the symbolism of the rainbow stacks up to the actual physical reality of one.

Of course I understand perfectly well that a symbol is merely that – a symbol meant to represent something, rather than a literal thing to be picked over, analyzed and scrutinized in detail.

But consider how the ANC communist agitators and their cap-wearing tribal enablers have seen fit to take the rainbow and marry the symbolism with the literal in order to produce their “no white in the rainbow” call to arms against whites, by inciting easily-manipulated battalions of machete-wielding savages. This abhorrent rallying cry has surely cost many Afrikaner farmers their lives.

It is therefore only fair that I should respond in kind and play by the same rules of comparing the symbolism with the literal in order to demolish the whole rainbow analogy, along with the amusing little “no white in the rainbow” illusion.

So please indulge me, and we shall not only demolish these misconceptions, but also unveil a far deeper level of insight concerning the rainbow – one which becomes a powerful symbol for our people, as well as a powerful symbol against the leftist agitators.

After all, South Africa’s rainbow analogy is now little more than a defunct pigsty just awaiting demolition.

But I guarantee that even as we are tearing down this rotten structure, something new and unexpected will emerge, an amazing revelation provided by Mother Nature herself.

The demolition begins

We therefore begin by smashing right through the first wall of this house of illusion to reveal what many of us with eyes already know: the fact that there is no black in the rainbow whatsoever. Nor can there ever be, for black is the complete absence of light, and is not even a spectral colour. So I guess that the black triagonal depicted on the nation’s flag alone will have to suffice.

At the same time, we also sweep away the notion of rainbow browns, which, although possible under artefactual laboratory conditions, are only theoretically possible in nature under the tightest, most stringent of Goldilocks conditions. In other words, essentially impossible.

Call me overly-fastidious, but I confirmed this myself after contacting an eminent professor from the States who specializes in the colourimetric analysis of rainbows and who, after 20 years of research analyzing thousands of rainbows utilizing spectroradiometry, has never once come across brown colouration in a rainbow under any conditions.

The absence of rainbow browns in nature and how this parallels the social issues unaddressed by the ANC for “coloured” (mixed race) South Africans is not lost on some, however:

Rainbow nationalism has proven to be an arid ideology that is long on rhetoric but short on practical solutions to racially defined problems of South African political life. It has already become something of a cliché among coloured people to dismiss rainbowism with the protestation that “there is no brown in the rainbow.”
– Mohamed Adhikari (“Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community”)

In using this literalist approach in examining the rainbow, am I suggesting for one moment that people of black or mixed racial ancestry do not belong in South Africa? Of course not! As I have already stated, I am simply playing by the same rules as the communist and tribal instigators.

On the note of literalism, a far more practical colour analogy for South Africa’s post-arpartheid communists to adopt would have been that of the four-colour CMYK model used in colour printing (C = cyan, M = magenta, Y = yellow, K = key [black]). With various combinations of these coloured inks, one can obtain virtually any shade of any colour. Problem solved.

The Ink Cartridge Nation, where there is “no white in the ink cartridge”.

It just doesn’t pack quite the same punch, though, does it?

No white in the rainbow?

And this now leads us to the grand finale of the rainbow question, and one which is of particular interest to our people – addressing the claim that there is “no white in the rainbow”.

To many it must sound strange. Shouldn’t the issue really be an open-and-shut case? After all, the rainbow’s “ROYGBIV” mnemonic should jog a few memories. So exactly where is white in the rainbow?

The answer will surprise most if not all of you, I guarantee.

Already I know what some of you might be thinking as you read these words. Some of you might be thinking that you know exactly where I’m heading with this line of thought. And that’s very intuitive of you; quite clever. But you’d be wrong.

You see, I know that many of you would be thinking along the lines of the familiar prism experiment, which demonstrates how white light is composed of the different colours of the rainbow (or more precisely the visible wavelengths of the spectrum), and that these colours can be made to coalesce back into pure white light when the process is reversed.

Well done if you were in fact thinking along these lines. You’ve at least scratched the surface of this puzzle, but you’d still be wrong about where all of this is heading. In fact, in a very bizarre way, there is a deeper truth hidden behind the truth regarding the whole issue.

But before we take that deep dive, we firstly need to resolve an enigmatic little curiosity regarding the prismatic-like formation of the rainbow.

We indeed know that white light gives birth to all of the colours of the rainbow, and, by conceptual extension, is very the rainbow itself, albeit in a refracted, slightly divergent form.

In this context, the rainbow therefore is white light, but oddly at the same time displays no white light.

Clearly we have reached some strange boundary here, a crossover point where the laws of physics quite literally spill over and mix with the metaphysical. Strange bedfellows no doubt, but still a perfect interpretation of the nature of the rainbow.

This on its own is enough to pull the rug out from under the machete-wielders and their instigators to collapse their “whiteless rainbow” argument altogether.

But now we dive even deeper where things become even more interesting. From this point we will go where few have ever gone before – not to the end of the rainbow, but into the very heart of one. And there we shall find gold.

And so as we pass across the threshold, we peel back one layer of truth only to uncover an even more profound one on the other side – the realization that a rainbow is not formed by a coloured arc in the sky. Yes, you read that correctly: A rainbow is not formed by a coloured arc in the sky. The architecture of a rainbow has virtually nothing at all to do with a coloured arc; it is no more a coloured arc in the sky than the hair on your head is a human being.

The real truth hidden behind the truth is that a rainbow is in fact constructed from a large disc of pure white light.

The whole structure is a huge, distorted image of the sun – an optical illusion, with all of the sun’s component wavelengths being reflected from the back surface of falling raindrops to produce a many-layered stack of different spectral-coloured discs, all of which overlap to produce pure white light. This is why the sky on the inside of a rainbow arc is brighter than the outer surrounding sky.

It is only at the very outer border of this multi-layered stack of discs where complete overlap ends, and we get a “spilling over” of wavelengths at the very edges, producing the respective spectral colours. This thin edge at the very outer rim is what we know as a rainbow.

The brilliant French polymath René Descartes was clever enough to figure this out in the 17th century.

White light as a symbol of wholeness and power

Once its architecture is fully understood, the rainbow can be seen as a symbol representing the holistic nature of light – specifically pure white light – and how white light represents a complete wholeness and a balance within the natural order.

Descartes himself realized this when he wrote:

A single ray of light [i.e. a single spectral colour] has a pathetic repertoire, limited to bending and bouncing (into water, glass or air, and from mirrors). But when rays are put together into a family – sunlight, for example – the possibilities get dramatically richer. This is because a family of rays has the holistic property, not inherent in any individual ray . . .”
– Descartes (1637)

White light represents pure power provided by Mother Nature herself, from the most powerful source of energy we have: Helios, Sol, the sun – the very giver of life itself.

The rainbow as a symbol of the ignorance of the left

Every bit as much, however, the rainbow itself can also be seen as a potent symbol representing the fundamental ignorance and absurdity of the left, with all of its conceited presumptions. Whether we are referring to illiterate machete-wielding butchers or pretentious placard-waving liberals, they are really all the same horrid little reflections of one another.

A further lesson from the deconstruction of the Rainbow Nation analogy

Besides the reframing of the symbolism of the rainbow, what else did the deconstruction of the Rainbow Nation analogy teach us?

In demolishing the rainbow analogy, we demonstrated how it is possible for an opponent to lose at their own loaded game, when those loaded rules fail to conform to the realities of nature. In this example, our opponent failed to realize the real truth behind the truth – the hidden truth – and lost the game by default.

Granted, this example may be somewhat conceptual and abstract, but even so it still adequately illustrates the point.

“There is no white in the rainbow”. They didn’t know about nature’s little hidden surprise, did they? They didn’t see it coming. Their lack of understanding was their downfall, because in the end their rules did not allow for the reality.

The rules

And now we move the discussion abruptly to another plane altogether, where another analogy is called for.

We are currently engaging an opponent who has forced us into playing a game of chess, the terms of which are of their choosing, not ours. And as we sat down and prepared to make our first move, we had discovered to our horror that the pieces had already been set up to endgame stage!

So we find ourselves sitting at our opponent’s table being forced to play their game by their rules, and at their mercy, staring down the barrel of defeat even before we have made our first move.

All we can do is hope. But hope for what?

Then we think back to the rainbow. We played that game by our opponent’s rules and we triumphed. We triumphed because of our opponent’s misplaced confidence, because of their own ignorance of a deeper hidden truth beneath the surface. All we had to do was look in the right place to find it; there was nothing complicated about it.

So once again we prepare to step inside and cross the threshold in our desperate attempt to find an answer. We pray it will be in there somewhere. Surely all we have to do is just look in the right place.

But then it dawns on us. We don’t need to step inside anywhere or cross any threshold, because we can already see the answer! It was right there all along! All we had to do was look in the right place: at the very board in front of us, and simply do what our opponent has done – set up our own endgame.

All we have to do is wait. Wait for that critical moment when our opponent has taken their eyes off the game long enough to allow us a momentary sleight of hand to covertly nudge just the right piece to just the right square, right under our opponent’s nose, thereby changing the whole dynamic of the game completely.

And then the mistake is made! Our opponent’s attention is broken just long enough and the piece is nudged. Then it is they who realize to their horror that their whole game plan has been completely derailed, their strategy rendered completely obsolete. They simply didn’t see it coming. They simply failed to grasp that their own complex, elaborate preparations to fix the game, so long in the making, involving the most intricate machinations and intrigues, could possibly be unraveled by such simplicity.

How often history has seen the fall of the haughty and the mighty in this way!

And this is when the endgame will turn on them and be theirs to face, and face it they shall.

Checkmate!

Just like our machete-weilding friends, our opponents also fell into the fatal trap of their own misguided assumptions – in this case that a herd of sheep were too far gone to be able to fight back – and thus they failed to see the deeper truth, the truth that simplicity can triumph over complexity. And in the end, their rules did not respect the reality of this fact.

The rebirth

If only the solution to our predicament was as straightforward as a single covert sleight of hand chess move outlined in the above example.

To entertain the idea that providence will somehow magically swoop in to rescue the righteous or to address injustices is complete foolishness, and is nothing more than an open invitation to complete disaster.

But in its own peculiar way, the above example does illustrate the very real truth that difficult situations – even seemingly impossible ones – can absolutely be overcome by those possessing a full grasp of the picture, and knowing exactly how to execute a viable strategy consistent with the realities of the situation. Look throughout history and you will find many examples of this.

If we learn, adapt and steel ourselves to face the challenges in front of us, we may well be able to skilfully negotiate our way out of this loaded game, out of this minefield that has been laid out by such evil.

And if we are able to do so, we can begin to rebuild what was once ours, what was once revered and sacred to our people, what was once our birthright.

In the end our enemies may well end up doing us the greatest of favours. They thought that they could bury us all in the ground and leave us to die, when in fact they had no idea that the very ground itself was blessed with fertility by the gods themselves, and that we were no less than the seeds of rebirth and renewal!

We shall then recapture all of the ground we have lost, and much, much more. New traditions and wisdom will augment and strengthen the ways of old, and what once belonged to us shall be ours again.

As we witness the downfall of our enemies, we shall marvel at the site of the mighty new phoenix, larger than it has ever been before, reaching new heights as never before, and evoking ancient fires that will burn brighter than ever before!

We shall exalt the birth of a mass folk consciousness, one that has evaded us all throughout our history, and one which will weld us all together finally, once and for all.

As we are forced into the giant crucible of fire, the impurities will fall away and the faithful shall remain, to begin to weld a new identity. The shattered pieces that were once our spirits, our lands and our lives will melt as the intense heat of the Great Bird of Fire awakens, and will condense and solidify into an unbreakable mass of steel which will last throughout the ages.

Long live our beloved Mother Europa, our people, and the emergence of a new Renaissance – Novum Renaissance – a mighty Global Collective for our Folk.

The future can be ours for the taking!

Welcome the Novum Renaissance.

The fire rainbow seen below, an uncommon phenomenon as it is, is particularly striking in this case due to its bird-like appearance, and quite neatly ties in together the themes of both the rainbow and the rising phoenix discussed in this article. Long live our Folk and the coming Novum Renaissance!