Watch Fauci Bitterly Attack Man-Made COVID Theory as a “Complete Distortion of Reality,” After Funding Man-Made COVID Experiments

Even though the US Department of Energy’s new assessment that COVID was made in a lab in China may be a hedged conclusion, it is not, as Anthony Fauci has argued, a “conspiracy theory” which is a “complete distortion of reality.” Fauci has been saying this for years to cover up his own role in funding Gain-of-function research in communist China, which made dangerous coronaviruses even more dangerous.

Senator Tom Cotton, 2022: Fauci should be prosecuted for his crimes

Read Next Article…

Yes, WHO Treaty Would Bury US Sovereignty, Make Bill Gates a World Dictator. Makes WHO the “Directing and Coordinating Authority” in Pandemics.

Some Republican Senators Oppose

Above image: WHO President Tedros Adhanom and Bill Gates

Despite the efforts of corporate media to deny it, the UN/WHO pandemic treaty coming up for approval by the Biden administration, possibly using legal loopholes which bypass the consent of the US Senate, would in fact grant the World Health Organization (WHO) near dictatorial powers upon its declaration of a pandemic, according to clear wording in the so-called Zero Draft document which is the working draft of the treaty.

Now some Republican senators are opposing the treaty.

On page 4 of Zero Draft regarding over-arching principles to be agreed to in the treaty, it is stated that.

“The Parties to this WHO CA+ [WHO convention agreement]…Recognizing the central role of WHO, as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, and in convening and generating scientific evidence…” (italics added)

Below: screen shot from page 4, Zero Draft (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)

The words “Recognizing the central role of WHO, as the directing and coordinating authority” in “pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, and in convening and generating scientific evidence” seems clearly intended to give WHO the last word on what the “science” is regarding any aspect of public health, or “global health governance.” “Governance” invokes the coercive powers of the state, but in manner which WHO decides.

“Pandemic…response,” or government “response” to any pandemic, which WHO decides exists in the first place, would naturally include any facet of the government response such as lockdowns, travel rights, mandatory vaccinations, and mandatory biometric proof of identity and “vaccination status.”

Professor Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, told The Epoch Times that the WHO treaty would be “fatally dangerous” to its signatories.

Boyle, a progressive human rights activist, said the writers of the accord “deliberately drafted it to circumvent the power of the Senate to give its advice and consent to treaties, to provisionally bring it into force immediately upon signature.” reports:

“[Boyle} argued that the Biden administration will treat the document, which will impact all U.S. officials from governors to health officials, as “an international executive agreement” that requires only his go-ahead without the input of the Congress.” 

An analysis of Zero Draft by Robert Romano posted at points out that Article 4, Section 3 of the draft agreement makes US sovereignty provisional, not absolute, in the event that WHO declares a pandemic,

Article 4, Section 3 of the draft agreement states,

“Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries.”

So if WHO decided that a country’s policies were causing “damage,” that country would have to reverse those policies or face serious sanctions from the other nations.

It is well-known that the controlling force behind WHO is Bill Gates and his minion president of WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, who is a member of a US State Department terrorist list organization, the Ethiopian Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPFL.)

Gates’ contributions are the single largest source of funding for WHO, greater even than the US share, when the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded GAVI contributions are combined.

In 2017 Politico wrote:

“The [Gates] foundation’s impact on the WHO is enormous,” said Garrett, of the Council on Foreign Relations. “If they weren’t there, if they walked away with their money, the deleterious impact would be profound, and everyone is all too aware of that.”

Below source:

Were WHO to declare a pandemic under the terms of the treaty and take control of world “health” policies, Bill Gates, in a very real sense, could conceivably become the single most powerful man in the history of the planet, able to override national governments and dictate the very terms of human existence, for as long as WHO says a pandemic state of emergency exists. WHO President Tedros is nothing more than a puppet of Bill Gates.

The Expose wrote in June 2021:

“Dr Tedros Adhanom is tied to Gates’s hip and has been an indispensable ally in executing Bill and Melinda Gates’s objectives…The only reason Dr. Adhanom landed the top job at WHO is because he sold his soul to join the Bill and Melinda Gates mafia.”

This is the same Bill Gates whose Gardasil experiments killed or crippled young, girls across India whose families were illiterate and could not read a consent form, according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Children’s Health Defense, and reports by the Economic Times of India. The same Bill Gates who funded, along with WHO, a series of studies on the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID which administered deadly doses of the drug in order to make it look dangerous (see following article.)

The same Bill Gates who, just as the COVID pandemic was being announced in 2020, directed millions of dollars to the Imperial College professor who wrote the paper which persuaded governments of the need for the first ever global “lockdowns,” a paper which Johan Giesecke, former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, called “the most influential scientific paper” in memory, and also “one of the most wrong.”

The same Bill Gates who with his billions co-sponsored  Event 201 in New York on Oct. 18, 2019, a pandemic “simulation” exercise which eerily was centered around a new, fictional kind of coronavirus which originated from bats, nearly two months before the first reports emerged out of Wuhan of a new, bat-origin coronavirus illness.

The same Bill Gates, ominously, who recently attended yet another pandemic drill, “Catastrophic Contagion,” which is premised on another virus break-out but this one far deadlier than COVID, which targets children.

Official Report of the India Parliament Committee on Gates-Funded Gardisal Experiments on Indian Girls, “Alleged Irregularities in the Conduct of Studies using Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine by Path in India.”

Read Next Article…

Bill Gates and WHO Funded Lethal, Fraudulent Hydroxychloroquine Studies to Suppress Effective COVID Treatment, to Gain Vaccine Approval

Researchers administered lethal doses in sham studies

As the US response to what was reported as a new virus out of bat caves in China ramped up, Bill Gates and the World Health Organization (WHO) teamed up to produce influential studies designed to turn researchers away from hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a remedy for COVID. Doctors around the world were reporting great success when used properly in the early stages. (Palmer Foundation: Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust to fund Covid-19 drug trials.)

As for “why,” FDA regulations do not allow “emergency use authorization (EUA)” to be granted to experimental vaccines unless there is no “available alternative.” Were alternative remedies such as HCQ to take hold, public funding, and the suspension of normal, years-long safety trials, especially for long-term effects, would have not been possible.

The WHO studies, and others also funded by Gates, subjected COVID patients to known lethal doses of HCQ, or about four times the maximum label dose. In one of the studies, the UK Recovery Trial run by Oxford University, COVID patients who were subjected to the dosages died at a rate 10% higher than those who were given nothing at all. The dosages were known to be lethal because the WHO itself had conducted the studies.

HCQ is one of the most heavily used, best understood medicines in the world, with doctors in any tropical region prescribing it regularly for malaria. The Gates-backed studies follow a pattern of junk-science studies, or worse, dangerous ones, being touted across the media as evidence of HCQ inefficacy, as opposed to the high standards which were demanded by Anthony Fauci for studies which showed effectiveness.

One April 2020 study which comes to the top of any search engine, even now, is a Georgia VA study involving 368 male COVID patients, which concludes no help from HCQ. But in the sloppiest of sloppy science, dosages are not specified, which would not be acceptable even in a high school science project. Nevertheless, the non-peer reviewed study was and is still trumpeted by online People Magazine, under the headline “Hydroxychloroquine Was Ineffective Against Coronavirus and Linked to Higher Death Rate, Study Finds.”

In May of 2021, the Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, in the High Court of Bombay, for Crimes Against Humanity by recommending “against the use” of another life-saving treatment for COVID, Ivermectin. The IBA noted that the punishment for the severest of allegations against Swaminathan is the death penalty. [IBA Complaint]

Comprehensive collections of all available studies on HCQ and Ivermectin overwhelmingly show benefit when used properly and early.

In the US, Ohio attorney Thomas Renz has formed a national network of lawyers bringing lawsuits by people who believe they have been harmed by government COVID policies and/or the vaccines.

Gates is Single Biggest Source of Funding for WHO

Gates’ contributions are the single largest source of funding for WHO, greater even than the US share, when the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded GAVI contributions are combined. WHO is currently in the process, again, of proposing to national governments, including the US, a treaty that would transfer national sovereignty to WHO and the UN in the event of a pandemic, in essence making Gates a world dictator.

The chairman of WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, is a close Gates ally who rose from the ranks of a US State Department terrorist list organization, the Ethiopian Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPFL.)

The treaty would require nations to order mandatory lockdowns, mandatory and forced vaccinations, and detentions. Gates’ influence on WHO in carrying out his personal agenda is unquestioned.

In 2017 Politico said:

“The [Gates] foundation’s impact on the WHO is enormous,” said Garrett, of the Council on Foreign Relations. “If they weren’t there, if they walked away with their money, the deleterious impact would be profound, and everyone is all too aware of that.”

Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts: The World Health Organization’s Dictator-Style Power Grab (view on Rumble)

HCQ studies as a whole still show overwhelmingly favorable results in the treatment of COVID, showing 72% lower mortality when administered early.

Yale School of Public Health’s Dr. Harvey Risch said in December of 2022 that US health authorities (such as Anthony Fauci) had sentenced up to “500,000 people to death from the infection because they couldn’t get treated because of the suppression of these treatments.” (Risch video) Dr. Robert Malone, an mRNA vaccine pioneer and now a prominent critic of the vaccines he helped create, made a similar estimate when he addressed Anthony Fauci on-camera, saying:

“Look Tony, there are over half a million deaths in the United States for this virus, completely unnecessary because the federal government has very actively blocked the ability of physicians to provide lifesaving medications early in the infection. “

Dr. Harvey Risch

Below: Financial Times, March 30, 2020 (Source)

Massive Doses Never Given by Doctors Given in WHO-Gates Backed HCQ Studies

Dr. Meryl Nass, MD, an internal medicine specialist in Ellsworth, Maine, noted in her blog in June of 2020 that WHO’s own consultant, in a past study, had determined that 1500 – 2000 mg of HCQ all at once could be a lethal dose. HCQ generally comes in a standard 200 mg dose per pill.

HCQ brand Plaquenil standard 200 mg pill

Dr. Nass wrote in her blog in June 2020:

“The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of chloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs.  Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of chloroquine base “may be fatal.”  According to Browning and Goldfrank, the pharmacokinetics and potency of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are almost identical…”

Below:  Page 5, WHO study on toxicity of chloroquine, similar dosage profile to related hydroxychloroquine (CLICK FOR LAGER IMAGE) (SOURCE)

The maximum official recommended dose for HCQ in the treatment of other maladies is 2000 mg total over 4 days. In the UK Recovery Trial, with “core funding” from the  Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a dosage of 9600 mg over 10 days was administered.

Below: Dosing information for UK Recovery Trial, from official protocol (source)

Below: Standard HCQ brand Plaquenil maximum dosage instructions. Reads: “Adult patients: Administer 800 mg initially; subsequently administer 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the initial dose (total dosage = 2000 mg over 4 days). (Source) (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)

Solidarity Trial dosing was similarly excessive, 8800 mg over 10 days, according to the protocol for the Norwegian arm of the study which took place over multiple countries.

Below: HCQ dosage for Norwegian arm of WHO Solidarity Trial (Source) (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)

HCQ Studies Halted After Completely Predictable Harms

About a month after they started, both the WHO Solidarity Trial and the UK Recovery Trial were halted, with great fanfare. In a statement which is prominent on the Internet to this day, on June 5, 2020, the UK Recovery Trial sponsored by the University of Oxford asserted “No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19”:

“Today’s preliminary results from the RECOVERY Trial are quite clear – hydroxychloroquine does not reduce the risk of death among hospitalised patients with this new disease.”

No mention of the dosages is made.

On June 15, 2020, the FDA withdrew Emergency Use Authorization for HCQ, directly citing the UK Recovery trial as a reason (FDA letter.)

In its attached “Memorandum Explaining Basis for Revocation of Emergency Use Authorization for Emergency Use of Chloroquine Phosphate and Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate,” the FDA wrote:

“the RECOVERY Trial results offer persuasive evidence of a lack of benefit of HCQ in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.”

The trials backed by Gates were stopped prematurely due to predictable poor results, which generated headlines greatly dampening enthusiasm for the study of HCQ in the treatment of COVID.

Below: June 2020 announcement that government of India stops HCQ COVID research (Source)

Doctors Persecuted

Yet doctors who followed the science and the experience of other doctors around the world were fired, threatened with prosecution, had their medical licenses yanked, and were smeared as “quacks” despite lifetimes of impeccable service.

Below: Press Conference by Houston Methodist Hospital Dr. Mary Bowden suspended for positive Twitter remarks on Ivermectin as treatment for COVID (View at Bitchute)

Now it turns out that an organization which led attacks on doctors who prescribed an HCQ or Ivermectin protocol for COVID, “No License for Disinformation,” was also funded heavily by Bill Gates. This was discovered in the summer of 2022 when one of the doctors so persecuted, Dr. Mary Bowden (in video above), hired a private investigator to find out who was behind the attack on her medical license.


Also Read:

Autopsies Show Direct Causal Link Between Unexpected Deaths and COVID Vaccines

1,000+ Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries

Real Not Rare (Vaccine-injured website)


As of July 2021, 20 countries were  using Ivermectin to treat Covid-19, including Mexico, Guatemala, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Nigeria, and Egypt.

[All studies on Ivermectin as treatment for COVID]

In the US, since COVID began, 94% of deaths listed as from COVID have been people over age 50, and 75% of those over age 65. Government totals do not distinguish between COVID as the primary cause of death or a “contributing” cause of death, which could mean merely a positive test.

In March 2020, even before news of the possible success of HCQ became widely known, Gates began funding a University of Washington study which found it ineffective in treating COVID. But the study administered HCQ alone rather than in the specific protocol combining it with Zinc and Azithromycin.

The University of Washington, to which Gates and Seattle-based Microsoft are its most generous donors, ran another study discounting HCQ which was doomed to fail. Gates has given nearly a half billion dollars to UW over the years.

An eye-opening short documentary on the corruption of science and medicine by the pharmaceuticals industry is ‘“The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine” (below.)

Below: Mini-documentary on the corruption of the “Medical Establishment”: ‘“The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine”

That Gates had a personal interest in seeing alternative remedies like HCQ fail became apparent in July of 2020 when, after trials he had funded predictably failed, he called the use of HCQ “outrageous.” Gates is not a doctor, a scientist, nor even a college graduate.

Gates: HCQ “outrageous” (view on Rumble)

But the coup d’grace in corrupting the medical establishment for Gates is WHO. As the UN health organization charged with leading the world’s response to a pandemic, WHO has outsized influence on any aspect of a response. In turn, mega-donor Bill Gates has outsized influence on WHO.

Gates’ Prior Offenses

In June of 2020 Gates plied $750 million on Oxford for a campaign to vaccinate people in poor countries with Astrazeneca. Astrazeneca’s vaccine has now been banned in 18 countries so far over deaths and severe blood clots. The episode is reminiscent of Gates’ sordid history in the Third World, especially India and Africa, which despite a vigorous “debunk” campaign calling this a “conspiracy theory,” is attested to by Indian doctors such as Dr. Visant Lad. See: “Indian High Court Orders Bill Gates to Respond to Vaccine Death Lawsuit.”

WHO Attacks Un-Vaccinated as “Killing Force,” Despite Pharma Admissions That Vaccines Do Not Stop Transmission, and Were Never Even Tested for It

The World Health Organization’s (WHO,) largest donation comes from the combined donations of two Bill Gates-controlled entities, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI,) which Gates founded.

Despite its own record of conducting deadly experiments such as the lethally-dosed Solidarity Trial, and responsibility for possibly millionso f deaths through fraud committed to deny life-saving remedies, WHO has just released a video which attacks the un-COVID-vaccinated and “anti-vaccine activism” as a “major killing force globally.”

In October 2022, Pfizer President of International Developed Markets, Janine Small, in a hearing before European Parliament, was asked by member MEP Rob Roos:

“Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?”

Small’s answer was “No.”

Not only did the Pfizer product not stop transmission. It was never even tested for it.

Pfizer has one of the worst product safety records in the world, having been slapped with over $10 billion in fines since 2000.

Nevertheless,  the likes of Anthony Fauci and Rachel Maddow over the last years maintained that the unvaccinated were ‘spreaders,’ despite knowing that the drugs had never been tested for their ability to stop the spread of COVID. Fauci and Maddow are thusly perpetrators of outright, material fraud.

Below: MSNBC Rachel Maddow, ‘COVID vaccines stop COVID transmission’ (view at Rumble)

Below: EU parliament member Rob Roos, October 2022, questioning Pfizer president (view at Rumble)

Bill Gates, the world’s most enthusiastic COVID vaccine promoter, once said “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.” Gates also said “You don’t get a choice” when it comes to being COVID-vaccinated.

Gates: “You don’t get a choice” (view at Rumble)

Below source:

It can be safely said that the interests of WHO and Gates are closely intertwined. In 2019, the Washington Post scoffed at the idea that Gates did not have active influence in the organizations he donates billions to. Reporting on another area of Gates philanthropy, education, the Washington Post noted in an article entitled, “Um, Who Are Bill and Melinda Gates Trying to Kid?”:

“…the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s annual letter was published and addressed nine things the couple said surprised them along their philanthropic journey.

This was Surprise #8: “Textbooks are becoming obsolete.”

The two then discuss the issue, not actually proving that textbooks are becoming obsolete — possibly because they aren’t — but instead talking up the virtues of online education. Why would the founder of Microsoft want to tout online education?”

Politico said:

“Some billionaires are satisfied with buying themselves an island. Bill Gates got a United Nations health agency in Geneva…Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom…The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s.” 

Although not a doctor, a scientist, nor even a college graduate, Gates once offered a medical opinion, on national TV, that HCQ is plagued by “severe side effects,” although it is considered a safe drug taken by billions of people each year, including children and lactating women, for the treatment and prevention of malaria. Given Gates’ medical credentials, the opinion may as well have been coming from a plumber who reads a lot.

At the same time, distinguished scientists like Dr. Harvey Risch, Professor Emeritus, Senior Research Scientist in Epidemiology, Yale University, MD, PhD, Cal Tech, is kicked off Twitter after Biden administration officials, doing the bidding of Bill Gates and Big Pharma, get their heads together with Twitter and decide desperately ill people should not hear what Dr. Risch has to say. Dr. Risch is a proponent of HCQ. (See: “Latest ‘Twitter Files’ reveal Biden officials colluded with Twitter on widespread censorship of medical experts“)

Indian Health Authority Doctors Blow Whistle on WHO Solidarity Trial

India’s ICMR is its official medical research agency, roughly the equivalent of the CDC in the US. Alluding to the extremely high doses of HQC being administered in the WHO Solidarity Trial, in May of 2020 the New Indian Express reported in “ICMR writes to WHO disagreeing with HCQ assessment, officials say international trial dosage four times higher than India”:

“India’s nodal government agency ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) overseeing the country’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has…written to the WHO citing differences in dosage standards between Indian and international trials that could explain the efficacy issues of HCQ in treating COVID-19 patients.”

The doctors at the ICMU told WHO that Solidarity’s doses were too high, and that good results were being obtained by Indian doctors prescribing 2400 mg spread out over five days, rather than in a toxic blast all at once..

The New Indian Express described its successful protocol:

“HCQ dosages are administered in the following way- 1st day a heavy dose of 400mg HCQ dose once in the morning and one at night, followed by 200 mg HCQ one in the morning and one at night to be followed for the next four days. The total dosage administered to a patient in 5 days, therefore, amounts to 2400 mg.”

Dr. Meryl Nass, MD wrote in her blog in June of 2020:

“Last week, I was alerted to the fact that India’s ICMR, its official medical research agency, had written to the WHO, telling WHO that the hydroxychloroquine doses being used in the Solidarity trial were 4 times higher than the doses being used in India.  Then I learned that Singapore had been hesitant to participate in the WHO trial due to the hydroxychloroquine dose.”

In other words, WHO was administering nearly 10,000 mg, four times more, over 10 days, an extraordinary amount of HCQ.

Holocaust Survivor, Human Rights Activist Vera Sharav Minces No Words

Never one to mince words, Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor, tireless human rights activist, and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, wrote in June 2020:

“Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.”

  • Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.
  • Recovery [Trial] experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.

In Brazil, a study published on April 24, 2020 administered 12,000 mg of chloroquine, a precursor of HCQ with a similar dosage profile, over 10 days. The study’s authors seemed surprised to note that:

” Lethality until day 13 was 39.0% in the high-dosage group (16 of 41) and 15.0% in the low-dosage group (6 of 40).”

The study obligingly concluded that:

“The preliminary findings of this study suggest that the higher CQ dosage should not be recommended for critically ill patients with COVID-19 because of its potential safety hazards…”

In 2021, long after the Gates-backed HCQ trials were exposed by Dr. Nass, the prestigious British Medical Journal nevertheless published“Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19,” by Luis Ignacio Garegnani of the Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. The article said:

 “despite the development of new therapies and the attempts for implementing repurposed drugs (because of their potential immunomodulator or antiviral effects), no reliable specific therapy has been identified yet. Azithromycin, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are some of those drugs, whose adverse effects and/or concerns about efficacy on COVID-19 treatment have determined its deimplementation by different agencies and regulatory authorities…” (Italics added)

The BMJ, very unscientifically, never specifies the studies which have determined the “deimplementation” of HCQ, but the Solidarity and Recovery studies are lingering in the air.

Even after the Recovery, Solidarity, and other high-dose trials have been discredited, Internet searches continue to turn up misinformation based on them, either directly or by inference. On April 24, 2020 the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota issued a stern warning that the FDA had  issued a warning on the use of HCQ. The University of Minnesota posted:

“The warning is related to the potential for the drugs to prolong the QT interval—a cardiogram measurement used to assess some of the electrical properties of the heart—and cause abnormal heart rhythms, particularly in patients with cardiac conditions. Those risks may increase when the drugs are combined with the antibiotic azithromycin, which can further increase the risk for sudden cardiac arrest.

The post goes on to cite the flawed Brazil study. The warning remains online to this day, prominent in web searches on HCQ..

The tradition of maligning possibly good cures with junk science which borders on criminal continues in the ongoing war on HCQ as well as Ivermectin. As recently as December of 2022, lead investigator Dr. Adrian Hernandez, of the Duke University School of Medicine, generated a UPI headline “Another study shows ivermectin doesn’t work against COVID-19” in which the authors admit support from Big Pharma AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Pulmatric, Sanofi-Aventis, Genentech, NIH, NIAID. and the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.

Dr. Hernendez’z’s study administered .6 mg of Ivermectin per kg of body weight for 6 days. The typical maximum dose for Ivermectin for common diseases is a one-time dose of .2 mg/kg, repeated after two weeks.

The metric for success in the study was that the patient not report any symptoms of COVID for 3 days, a loose threshold.

Hernandez’s’s study concluded: [the] “findings do not support the use of ivermectin in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.” Interestingly, 84% of the study participants were vaccinated with two or more COVID vaccine doses.

[Indian Bar Association Press Release] [Indian Bar Association Complaint]

A South Carolina Department of Health 2021 advisory warned that reports suggesting success in the use of Ivermectin for COVID were “unscientific.” But many were field reports from frontline doctors and were not meant to constitute full-blown studies. The SC Health Department advisory warns in “The Dangers of Using Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for Preventing or Treating COVID-19”:

“In some unpublished reports in other countries (e.g., Egypt, India, Iran, Iraq) Ivermectin seemed to improve outcomes for COVID-19 patients, but these were not scientific studies. Multiple studies published on Ivermectin have been subsequently retracted when they were found to be based on falsified data or errors in analysis and are misleading.”

In its link to “misleading,” the SC Department of Heath circles back to the British Medical Journal article which never cites a study for its conclusions, but strongly suggests the Recovery Trial which had directly caused “different agencies and regulatory authorities,” such as the FDA, to ‘deimplement’ HCQ.

The Vaccines, Vaccines, and Only Vaccines Agenda Continues. Why?

By August of 2020 articles were appearing which warned against the misuse of drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin, which conflated improper use of the drugs with the drugs themselves. One was the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s “More than 100 Americans have died after taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 despite Donald Trump insisting people had ‘nothing to lose’ by trying the unproven drug.”

A year later, after over 6,000 deaths following the COVID vaccines had been reported to the same government reporting system, there was no headline in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, or any other newspaper. Now it is over 32,000. But if one person dies after misusing HCQ, it is reported across the media.

With a similar campaign taking place against Ivermectin, the primary objective remained on-track. Nothing would get in the way of universal access to everyone’s bloodstreams under the guise of “vaccination.”

Obviously this was important to someone, to people with the enormous power to corrupt entire institutions such as the mainstream media, government regulatory agencies, and the medical establishment. The lethal dosing of Recovery Trial and Solidarity Trial patients should have been big news, but instead, doctors talking about it risked being banned from Twitter for “misinformation,” and being branded as anti-vaxxer quacks, no matter how distinguished their credentials were.

Of the mainstream media, only Laura Ingraham in early 2020 got the story, and ran with it (below.) Even in the alternative media few were aware of the enormity of the deception, with the exception of Del Bigtree (below.)

Laura Ingraham

Del Bigtree (view at Rumble)

The End Game: Cradle-to-Grave, 24/7 Total Control of All (Non-Elite) Humans

But as a number of deep and critical thinkers have maintained, it is not that hard to figure out. The inexorable move toward universal, mandatory, regular mass vaccination is the key to the roll-out of a global, mandatory, digital ID, purportedly as proof of vaccine status but also now linked to every bit of information on everyone on the planet, who does not belong to a miniscule, exempt class of billionaires. The digital ID will be linked to a single digital currency, which can be shut off at the first sign of social “misbehavior.”

No conjecture or speculation on this is necessary. Elite cabals such as the World Economic Forum say openly, couching cashless society, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in terms such as “digital equality,” that this is the goal.

Investment banker and former President George HW Bush high official Catherine Auston Fitts explains that this will be akin to replacing cash with a system of credits and debits “at the company store.” writes:

 “many fear that a centrally-created and centrally-controlled digital currency, as opposed to a “decentralized” cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, would strip individual citizens of their autonomy, privacy, and financial freedom.”

Presaging how such a system could be used, Life Site notes that during the anti-COVID vaccine mandate truckers convoy of2021, the bank accounts of anyone making donations to the convoy were frozen, after troublesome law enforcement requirements. With a new CBDC system, the same outcome could be a matter of the flick of a switch in the hands of a central bank.

Bill Gates: The Banned Documentary (view at Rumble)

For a full understanding of how this would work it is important to be familiar with the following carefully selected, short list of articles and video interviews. For more on Bill Gates’ enormous influence on the world response to COVID, see “REPORT 9”: THE BILL GATES-FUNDED PAPER WHICH CREATED THE ‘NEW NORMAL’ GOVERNMENT POWERS IN APRIL 2020”

Autopsies Show Direct Causal Link Between Unexpected Deaths and COVID Vaccines

Children’s Health Defense: “Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.”

The late Dr. Zev Zelenko, discoverer of HCQ COVID protocol, on his discovery, Fauci, and owners of the major media Blackrock and Vanguard (VIDEO).

George HW Bush Administration Official Catherine Austin Fitts Lays Out The Great Reset and How to Stop It (VIDEO)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 5G, digital currency, and the Great Reset

Top Scientists Explain How the CDC’s Own Data Shows That Vaccines Are Designed to “Kill People Intentionally.”

Epoch TV: 31,696 COVID Vaccine Death Claims Submitted to CDC’s Reporting System Since 2020: Triple All Other Vaccines Combined Over 30 Years 

 Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer (CSO) and Vice President for Pfizer, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg,  former Chairman of the Council of Europe Health Committee, vaccines may be a mass “killing weapon” (View at Rumble)

Huge COVID Vaccine-Injured Rally in Los Angeles Blacked Out by Major Media, Injury Court Claims Skyrocket

1,000+ Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries

Real Not Rare (Vaccine-injured website)

Real Not Rare Facebook

Brave Denver Police Officer Crippled by Mandated Vax, Breaks Down on TV ‘Can’t Carry My Kids to Bed’

Crippling COVID injection reactions (view in Bitchute)

Pfizer Executive Admits COVID Vaccine Does Not Stop Transmission

ICU nurse Morgan Wallace, January 4, 2022, people who died of COVID “should be considered murdered” due to suppression of effective early interventions (view on Rumble)


You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes