CNN Fires Host Who Called President a “Piece of Shit” on Twitter!

RSS Feed

CNN Fires Host Who Called President a “Piece of Shit” on Twitter!

June 11th, 2017

Awake Goy

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 11, 2017

Leftism is emotionalism.

It is the feminine force in the world of men.

That is why these people make impulsive, stupid tweets and then delete them all the time.

I mean, I am on the internet most of the day, including sometimes while drinking and/or angry, and have never made some impulsive, emotion-driven post that I felt the need to delete.

This is an entirely leftist phenomenon.

BUT – that isn’t really the main takeaway here.

The main takeaway here is that CNN JUST FIRED ANOTHER EMPLOYEE.

This comes after they fired Cathy Griffin for her Trump decapitation photo.

She was the first case I’m aware of in the last 30 or 40 years of a liberal being fired – after a forced apology – for doing #JustLiberalThings.

RT:

CNN has dropped show host Reza Aslan after he called Donald Trump a “piece of sh*t” in a tweet after the president’s reaction to the London terror attacks last week. The network has come under fire for the decision.

Alsan, who hosted the Believer with Reza Aslan program, tweeted a reaction to Trump’s attacks on London Mayor Sadiq Khan in the wake of the attacks in the British capital.

Trump accused the mayor of downplaying the threat, by misrepresenting Khan’s comment that Londoners should not be alarmed by the additional armed police presence on the streets.

“This piece of sh*t is not just an embarrassment to America and a stain on the presidency,” Aslan said in a since-deleted tweet. “He’s an embarrassment to humankind.”

As an Islamic brown mutt, it seems to me you don’t really have any rights to stand on when saying what is an embarrassment to America or humans.

It would be like me going to a pack of wolves and singling one out and saying “that wolf there is an embarrassment to wolves and the biological family Canidae.”

I don’t have any rights to tell canines what should or shouldn’t be an embarrassment to them, just as Aslan has no right to judge human beings.

And I wouldn’t go try to lecture wolves simply because I didn’t think it was my place – I also wouldn’t want to make them angry.

A pack of angry wolves = big problem.

Might be an analogy these people would like to think through a little bit.

But they won’t.

Because of the feminine spirit which engulfs them.

The next day, Aslan tweeted an apology for his remarks.

“When in the first few minutes of the terror attack in London, the President of the United States tweeted about his travel ban, I lost my cool and responded to him in a derogatory fashion,” he wrote. “That’s not like me. I should have used better language to express my shock and frustration at the president’s lack of decorum and sympathy for the victims of London. I apologize for my choice of words.”

Haha.

Sympathy for the victims, he says.

I should not have used a profanity to describe the President when responding to his shocking reaction to the #LondonAttacks. My statement: pic.twitter.com/pW69jjpoZy

— Reza Aslan (@rezaaslan) June 4, 2017

“If Trump had sympathy for the victims of London, he would also want Americans to die, to commiserate – that was my logic.”

CNN announced it would not “move forward with production” of Reza’s show, adding, “We wish Reza and his production team all the best.”

Aslan later tweeted a response to his show being axed, saying he was disappointed but grateful to CNN.

“However, In these politically charged times, the tenor of our nation’s discourse has become complicated, and I recognize that CNN needs to protect its brand as an unbiased news outlet.”

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

CNN!

UNBIASED NEWS OUTLET!

My statement about the cancellation of #Believer pic.twitter.com/ITtXAyQwd5

— Reza Aslan (@rezaaslan) June 9, 2017

This is Alice in Wonderland now, folks.

By the way, this is the same guy who allegedly ate a human brain in a ritual in India for CNN.

So maybe he got cursed or something?

wew.

This is what winning feels like.

These are small wins – of course they are small wins. But they are symbolic wins. Because since the sixties, the old “conservative” movement never won anything. They best they did was hold some ground. But they were constantly losing ground, so holding some of it didn’t matter when none of it was ever retaken.

I mean on these issues: