Jew World Order

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 12, 2017

You all remember the famous line from Pulp Fiction, where the director himself, Quintin Tarantino, makes a cameo to explain that his base is not “dead nigger storage.”

Classic.

Jimmy’s garage is not dead nigger storage.

However, the entire planet earth is live nigger storage – and regrettably, we are running out of room.

As we recently learned when Emmanuel Macron said that African females should top having 7-8 babies each, any attempt to limit African breeding is pure hatred for the color of the skin.

But we’ve got an issue. In 80 years, we are going to have 4 billion live niggers on this planet.

And we’re going to need a place to store them.

RT:

On July 11, 1987, eight-pound baby boy Matej Gaspar was born to a couple in Yugoslavia. As commonplace as the event might have seemed at first, its significance was quickly recognized by the United Nations.

It marked the ‘Day of the Five Billion’, the official day the Earth’s population reached that milestone.

Then-UN Secretary General Javier Perez even visited the Zagreb hospital himself to hold baby Matej, and said: “For the first time in our history, we are able to support five billion people. For the first time we can say with confidence that we have the ability to support those who will come after.”

Two decades earlier, controversial American biologist Paul R Ehrlich made the opposite point in ‘The Population Bomb’, a book that made dire predictions about humanity’s ability to feed future generations.

In 1968, he wrote that mankind was on the cusp of breeding itself into oblivion and there was little that could stop a “substantial increase” in the world death rate. He predicted that the children of the 70s and 80s would bear witness to an epoch of famines where “hundreds of millions will starve to death” and, like ancient human civilizations, our numbers were accumulating to the point of an “ecocatastrophe.”

Now, on the 30th anniversary of the ‘Day of the Five Billion’, Ehrlich admits his population predictions were not accurate. In fact, since the release of Ehrlich’s book, every year but one (1992-1993) has seen the world’s crude death rate decrease.

…

“Any scientist who writes in 1968 and still believes they’d write the same book on the same topic in 2017 is not much of a scientist,” Erhlich told RT.com.

“I put too much dependence, for instance, on agricultural economists who did not predict how fast the ‘green revolution’ would take. There’s lots of things I’d do differently in the book.

“But the basic story has never been criticized scientifically,” he added. “To [sustain] the number of people we have today at the standards of living we have today… for 50 to 100 years, you’d need one and a half Earths.”

Ehrlich, who once stated how sterilization could be implemented as a form of population control, believes that if the whole world were to consume energy and food at a similar rate to North America – Europe just about lags behind in terms of food wastage – the human race would need to find “four or five more Earths” for survival.

We need sterilization.

This simply could not be any more obvious.

We either need that or race-specific viruses to wipe out huge numbers of Africans.

Africa is the problem. No one else is having this issue.

“Every scientist I know thinks there are too many people on the planet and we’re consuming too much and we’re destroying our life support systems by killing off other organisms on the planet,” Ehrlich said. “We’re basically sawing off the limb we are sitting on and the big concern now is can you soften the collapse.”

Yeah.

Obviously.

And we are doing it explicitly because it makes baby-boomers feel good to have infinity Africans.

Last month, the UN released its own population forecast predicting an annual population increase of 83 million people. Over the course of the next 13 years, the global population will grow from 7.6 to 8.6 billion and to 9.8 billion by 2050.

Despite projected decreases in fertility rates in countries with high birth rates, it’s estimated that the population could hit over 11 billion by the start of the 22nd century. Overall, there is just a 27 percent chance the planet’s population will stabilize.

Yeah but look.

That chart really isn’t worth very much if you don’t include the races that are doing this, is it?

We do not have a “global population problem” we have a “nigger birthrate problem.”

All white countries have negative population growth. The Japs have negative population growth. China has its population under control. Southeast Asia (probably excluding the Philippines, but they’re working on it) is dealing with the issue.

Even the Moslems aren’t doing that badly.

There is a big bootlipped elephant in the room here, and not discussing that is insane.

But after the Macron backlash, it looks like we’re not going to be able to discuss this in polite company any time soon, huh?

John Wilmoth, Director of the UN Population Division, does not see high population growth as a sign of civilization’s collapse. Rather he views it a “victory over premature death.”

This is the same UN that told us that overpopulation was going to lead to a total collapse of civilization and actually evangelized to whites telling them to stop having kids.

But the ethnic nature of the current crisis has made it no longer a crisis – now it’s actually good, somehow.

Wilmoth told RT.com that “very little” can actually be done to reduce the total size of the human population, but the key to averting any eco-disaster is changing consumption patterns.

All kinds of HUGE things can be done:

1. Mass sterilization, either in the African water supply or by paying African women some nominal fee ($700) to undergo a procedure
2. Race specific viruses designed to wipe-out 95% of the population of Africa
3. Killer robots released to slaughter Africans

And there are plenty more options that go a long way beyond “very little.”

“Very little” is only true in the paradigm of your selfish, evil boomer “morality.”

“I really believe that the human population faces major sustainability issues whether we have four billion, seven billion or 11 billion people on this planet. Four billion people would be very capable of messing up this planet, especially if you had four billion people consuming like North Americans or Europeans,” he said.

That is simply bullshit.

We “consume,” but we also “preserve.” Our net effect on the planet is much, much less than the effect of the third world.

Look at this global forests map:

We protect our fauna better than any of the monkeys.

And how about clean water?

Again, we are winning that battle by a lot.

How about risk for extinction of species?

Oh and wait – how about global air pollution?

It all matches exactly with the global population map.

So, basically: fuck off with your “whites are destroying the world by consuming too much.” This is the stupid fucking lie the UN kikes have ever come up with.

It simply has no basis in fact whatsoever, at all, by any single measure.

It is a lie.

Niggers are destroying the planet by breeding out of control and showing absolutely no care whatsoever for the natural world that they are destroying as they expand.

There is no “first world overconsumption problem,” there is a “stupid and irresponsible nigger problem.”

Period.

That is the fact.

It is absolutely disgusting that these UN fucks are able to keep telling these lies without being questioned.

It if infuriating.

“A sustainable future for the world has to involve an emphasis on behavioral changes, much more than on reducing the number of people living on the planet.”

This is a lie.

It is not a matter of misunderstanding data.

This is an outright lie.

Among other things, the UN’s sustainable development goals are concern with ending world hunger. But Wilmoth said the problem is distribution rather than an inability to feed growing numbers.

Ending world hunger is the exact opposite of what you want to do.

You need these people to starve.

Or, you need to sterilize or exterminate them.

Period.

We do not have a lot of choices here.

“The problems tend to be associated with issues surrounding peace and conflict. It’s ultimately political instability that is the cause of much hunger and malnutrition in the world today. It’s not an inability to grow the food, it’s an inability to get the food to those who are in need,” Wilmoth said.

He suggested that limiting family size, like the Chinese government’s former one-child policy, cannot be the answer to ensuring a more sustainable future.

…

“To fundamentally change [population] trends would require actions that are just unconscionable – either releasing germs into the population so that a lot of people become sick and die, or forced sterilization of men and women.”

B-I-N-G-O!!!!

WE HAVE A WINNER!

That is not simply “one of the solutions,” it is the only solution.

And we need to stop acting like a bunch of little babies, and get on it.

Not tomorrow, but yesterday.

The very first thing we need to stop doing is talking about colonizing other planets for the purpose of sending billions of niggers to go live in outer space.

Because that is fucking retarded.