Jew World Order

Mossad Clique Revealed in Theo Van Gogh Murder Hoax

Revelation due to one of our posters

Regarding the purported murder of Theo Van Gogh is there anything about it that is real? It has all the indications of being a contrived event. Little which is claimed about it can be substantiated.

Sure it was, right, the supposed killer, Mohammed Bouyeri, was ‘radicalized’ while in prison for petty crimes. Sure it was, the same story as always. Radicalized, right, sure, with the purported killer being even associated with the hoax of 9-11: 

Now, why would the man become actually radicalized just because of the death of his mother? What does that have to do with anything? By no means does this make any sense. There were no Sept. 11 hijackers. Therefore, the entire story line about a relationship to 9-11 by arch-Zionist mole Sterling is nothing other a filthy lie.

Another promoter of the event as an example of Islamic ways is none other than that terminally rabid arch-Zionist extremist, Adam Pearlman aka Adam Gadahn. Pearlman called for the Muslims to go out and attack Westerners, merely because they are supposed ‘crusaders’ or ‘Zionists.’ He upholds the purported murder of Van Gogh as a benchmark for the kinds of actions Muslims must take. That’s right, Muslims are expected to take advice from Pearlman, one of the most terminally rabid Zionist criminal minds known.

“Muslims in the West have to remember that they are perfectly placed to play an important and decisive part in the Jihad against the Zionists and crusaders, and to do major damage to the enemies of Islam, waging war on their religion, sacred places, and things, and brethren,” says Gadahn. “This is a golden opportunity and a blessing.”

He claims that many Western born or raised jihadis, the “brothers who came from abroad” are now thinking about returning to their “Crusader” countries to “discharge their duty of jihad.” He also says not to worry about imprisonment, since so many have been jihadis have been set free. “If it’s Allah’s will that you be captured, then it’s not the end the world, and it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re going to spend the rest of your life in prison.” Many mujahideen who were locked up “are now back home with their families, or back on the front-lines, fighting the enemies.”

It does look like the Islamophobe Mr. Van Gogh on the ground in the imagery. There are two knifes that are apparently jabbed into the man’s chest area, both on the right side. Both these knives are associated with the implausible: areas which are free of all evidence of blood. In one case the knife is associated with a piece of paper, a purported note; there is not even the slightest evidence of blood on that note. How can that be when the knife is jabbed directly into the chest. If real, much blood would pour out, and the note would be stained significantly. It has all the appearance of being carefully staged, fully as a means of demonizing the faith of Islaam:

Such commentary is obviously a set-up. Bouyeri had a short beard. Surely, he wasn’t wearing bedouin clothing; this type of commentary has the hallmark of the Mossad and is the same type used by Mossad infiltrators on 9-11.  See the attempt to make the people of Islaam appear demonic, that is he just “stayed next to him and waited”, all in order to “make sure” he was absolutely “dead.” What killer would do that in front of dozens upon dozens of eyewitnesses?

The top knife enters at a bizarre angle; again, there is no blood. With such a knife wound into the body there should be bright red arterial blood on both the white and blue clothing.

Thus, it is said that he was killed in front of dozens of people. Now, those dozens of people are seen but not in the original photograph. Even so, that’s quite a feat by the ‘murderer’ to do this, that is to shoot him, then stab him cleanly twice, and to in particular run the knife through a note and also through the chest simultaneously. How could this be done without the note being fully blood-stained? Too, in what way was he mutilated? Where, how? There is no evidence of this.

Even the sheet the covers him is free of all blood staining. Yet, it was said that he was both shot and stabbed. If so, surely there would be the spillage of much blood.

What about Hirsi Ali’s claim of an attempted beheading and the shooting of Van Gogh multiple times. Is there any evidence of the slightest degree for this?

There is no evidence of any kind. Moreover, regarding gunshot wounds there is no evidence of these, no visible entrance or exit wounds, no tearing or ripping of the clothes.

Nor is there any obvious pallor in Van Gogh; at this point he is supposed to be dead. Too, his fingers are in a flexion mode. How could he do that if he was already a mere corpse?

According to the media sources:

A suspect, a 26-year-old man with dual Dutch-Moroccan nationality, was arrested after a shootout with officers that left him wounded, police said.

Filmmaker Theo van Gogh, 47, had been threatened after the August airing of the movie Submission, which he made with a right-wing Dutch politician who had renounced the Islamic faith of her birth.

Police had kept watch on Van Gogh’s house as protection immediately after the film’s release, but it was dropped because there was no concrete evidence of a threat, public prosecutor Leo de Wit said.

In a recent radio interview, Van Gogh dismissed the threats and called the movie “the best protection I could have. It’s not something I worry about.”

Police said Van Gogh’s killer shot and stabbed his victim and left a note on his body. They declined to comment on reports that his neck was slashed and would not reveal the contents of the note.

The attacker fled to the nearby East Park and was arrested after exchanging gunfire with police, police spokesman Eric Vermeulen said. Both the suspect and a police officer suffered minor injuries.

A witness told Dutch Radio 1 the killer arrived by bicycle and shot Van Gogh as he got out of a car. “The shooter stayed next to him and waited. Waited to make sure he was dead,” the witness said.

Van Gogh’s killing immediately rekindled memories of the 2002 assassination of Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn, who polarized the nation with his anti-immigration views — particularly against Moroccan and Turkish immigrants — and was shot to death days before national elections. A Dutch animal rights activist was convicted in his slaying.

Van Gogh’s next movie, scheduled to debut on the Internet in December, is titled 06-05 and is about the May 6, 2002 slaying of Fortuyn.

The filmmaker had often come under criticism for his controversial movies, and he wrote columns about Islam on his Web site and for the Dutch newspaper Metro.

He has had formal complaints filed against him for making alleged anti-Jewish, anti-Christian and anti-Muslim comments in interviews and columns that he wrote. His many provocative statements including mocking a prominent Dutch Jew, making references to “the rotten fish” of Nazareth and calling a radical Muslim politician “Allah’s pimp.”

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-11-02-filmmaker-killed_x.htm

The homosexual Van Gogh is hardly a believable character. His entire life is a mere charade.

What of the purported killer Mohammed Bouyeri? By all accounts he was prior to this a mere petty criminal.

He’s obviously a mole, a fake, like the others. The petty criminal was given a significant sum for his role in this act.

 

http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2011/06/al-qaeda-new-video-calls-for-lone-wolf.html

http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/famous/theo_van_gogh/4.html

http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/nine-convicted-in-dutch-terrorism-case.97767/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6054324.stm