AstraZeneca pays doctors to promote vaccines on ITV – AstraZeneca withdraws its covid vaccine worldwide


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Every year, members of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry are required to disclose money that has been paid to healthcare professionals.  Disclosures for the year 2022 reveal that AstraZeneca paid doctors for “contracted services” who then appeared on ITV to promote vaccines or downplay vaccine injuries.  The affair is being dubbed ITVGate by social media users.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Dr. David Cartland tweeted: “#ITVGate has uncovered a massive pyramid of payments from AstraZeneca and Pfizer to doctors in the UK. The same doctors that told you the vaccines were safe and effective and we were all in this together. Oh, and don’t forget to clap, every Thursday, while we rehearse our TikToks. Oh, and that Dave Cartland dude speaking up – we’re going to destroy him so that no doctor will ever speak up again.

“There are 200 pages of recipients of pharma payments – and bear in mind that it is not compulsory to declare these payments in the UK, so this could be the tip of the iceberg.”

Using Disclosure UK Database

The Disclosure UK database aims to ensure transparency in the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and healthcare professionals (“HCPs”), other relevant decision-makers (“ORDMs”) and healthcare organisations (“HCOs”).

As part of wider efforts to increase transparency, all pharmaceutical companies abiding by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (“ABPI”) Code of Practice are required to disclose Transfers of Value (“ToVs”) to HCPs, ORDM and HCOs.

The database divides ToV’s into three categories: HCO, HCP and aggregates. ToVs to members of the public are not recorded in Disclosure UK.  However, starting with 2022 data, ABPI requires pharmaceutical companies to publish aggregate information about relationships with certain members of the public on their own websites.

Regardless of the recipient, ToVs concerning research and development activities are disclosed as a single, aggregated value in Disclosure UK.  For aggregates, no recipient is named.

ToVs related to non-research and development activities are published against individually named recipients, where legally able.[1]  ToVs to HCOs are reported under the category of HCO.  ToVs to either HCPs or ORDMs are collectively reported under the category of HCPs in Disclosure UK.

There are two ways to peruse Disclosure UK’s database.  The first is to search online for a specific name of a healthcare professional, healthcare organisation or pharmaceutical company by clicking on the appropriate icon HERE which will take you to a page where you enter the name in a search field.  See the images below for an example.

1 / 7

The second is to download the full dataset and interrogate the data in an Excel workbook.  There is a dataset for each of the years 2020, 2021 and 2022.  Disclosure UK maintains data on its website for three years, in other words when 2023 data is uploaded, data for 2020 will be removed.  There is no dataset which shows an aggregation of the years.

We downloaded the datasets for the three years 2020 to 2022 and aggregated the ToVs for the three years from each pharmaceutical company for the category HCP.  We then re-ordered the data to show from the largest to the smallest.  So that the file is more compact, we have shown the list in three columns. 


In total, pharmaceutical companies have given more than £78 million to healthcare professionals with nearly £63 million coming from just 20 pharmaceutical companies. The top five – AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Pfizer Ltd and Janssen-Cilag Ltd – paid £27.7 million to UK health professionals over the three years.

Please note: The title has an error. It should read “for the years 2020-2022.”
Please note: The title has an error. It should read “for the years 2020-2022.”

AstraZeneca Paying Doctors

The top earner from AstraZeneca is Professor David Wheeler who is an expert in the field of kidney medicine. He is an Honorary Consultant Nephrologist at the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and a Professor of Kidney Medicine at University College London.

Prof. Wheeler has made significant contributions to the development of clinical practice guidelines for several organisations, including Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (“KDIGO”), of which he is currently co-chair. He has also participated in several large-scale clinical trials testing various treatments for chronic kidney disease.

In 2022, he earned £52,000 from AstraZeneca and an additional £27,000 from other pharmaceutical companies.

The second largest earner from AstraZeneca is Dr. Mona M. Bafadhel, a Professor of Respiratory Medicine at King’s College London and a Consultant Respiratory Physician at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust.  She earned £48,000 in 2022 from AstraZeneca for contracted services.

But most interestingly, the 10th top earner from AstraZeneca was Ranjit  Singh, a consultant who is represented by Talent4 Media, an agency that manages a variety of TV and radio presenters and experts. AstraZeneca paid Singh £22,500 in 2022 for contracted services.

Singh is a presenter on ITV and he goes by the name of Dr. Ranj Singh or simply Dr. Ranj. For over 10 years, Singh made regular appearances on ITV’s This Morning offering medical advice.  He resigned from the show in May 2023 claiming the culture on the show became “toxic” and that he was “managed out” after he tried to raise his concerns.

Here is Singh giving “medical advice” regarding blood clots caused by covid “vaccines.”

Turns out Dr Ranj was wrong
Where’s the accountability for the misinformation?— AmaZeBalls SheZZa (@5shezz4) May 2, 2024

AstraZeneca has now admitted in court documents that its covid vaccines cause blood clots and has withdrawn its covid vaccine due to “a decrease in demand.”

And Singh has deleted his Twitter profile.

PROPAGANDA-This is Dr Ranj Singh & this is proof of his payment from Astra Zeneca.

He’s deleted his account, saying people were mean to him, but he really deleted it so no one would post the evidence!

Too late, I found it! Astra Zeneca paid him £22,500 for services!

GOTCHA— Artemis (@Artemisfornow) May 9, 2024

AstraZeneca recruited other TV doctors as well.

In November 2021, Singh, Dr. Philippa Kaye, Dr. Nighat Arif, Dr. Punam Krishan and Dr. Stephanie Jen Chyi Ooi called for children to get the nasal spray flu vaccine as soon as it is offered through schools or GPs.  Their call was part of AstraZeneca’s ‘Share Good Times Not Flu campaign’.

Not only was Dr Ranj recruited for #AstraZeneca, but so was Dr Nighat Arif to launch a campaign in 2021/22 for children to be vaccinated against flu with a nasal spray flu vaccine. Both of them featured in the clip pushing the Covid jab.— Political B (@p_beejal) May 10, 2024

In 2022, Kaye earned £12.500 from AstraZeneca, Arif earned £10,000, Krishan earned £6,000 and Ooi earned £10,000.

There is more to this story, but this article serves as a good starting point.  For those who want to find out more, the Twitter handle Jikkyleaks has been tweeting about it in recent days.


[1] “Where legally able” refers to regulations surrounding the publication of personal data.  Data privacy laws in the UK, General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), mean that to process personal information about a person, companies must choose a lawful basis before they do so. There are six bases to choose from, as defined by the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), one of them being a person has given clear consent for their personal data to be processed for a specific purpose.

Because of the limitations of obtaining consent, ABPI is now encouraging companies to use “legitimate interests” as their lawful basis for processing people’s data. ABPI is promoting this change in approach to help increase the number of named healthcare professionals and other people in Disclosure UK.

According to the guidance notes for analysis of the Disclosure UK 2022 data:

“The publication of data associated with individuals – whether HCPs or ORDMs – is regulated by the UK Data Protection Act and GDPR requirements in the UK. To date, most companies have used ‘consent’ as the lawful basis to publish information related to individuals. This means that disclosure is dependent on whether individual HCPs and ORDMs provide informed consent for the publication of ToVs that they received from pharmaceutical companies. This poses a challenge in further improving transparency through Disclosure UK as some individuals choose to exercise their rights under the GDPR and do not provide consent. To address this challenge, the ABPI has since encouraged companies to use ‘legitimate interests’ as the lawful basis for processing and disclosing individual data.

“If consent was not obtained from an HCP/ORDM to disclose the ToVs received against their name, or if consent was obtained but subsequently withdrawn, then the ToVs made to that HCP/ORDM were disclosed anonymously in the aggregate figure.

“In the UK, companies are not required to gather consent from HCOs, nor use another legal basis under the Data Protection Act, to disclose their ToVs. In alignment with this, it is not possible to report HCOs in aggregate via Disclosure UK.”

To save our readers having to download the full dataset to read it, we have attached a copy of the ‘Disclosure UK: understanding the data – Guidance notes for analysis of the 2022 data’ dated 16 June 2023 below.

If you like our work please consider to donate:

3 years after serious safety issues were reported AstraZeneca withdraws its covid vaccine worldwide


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Oxford-AstraZeneca has withdrawn its Covid-19 vaccine worldwide.  The decision to withdraw the vaccine was made on 5 March but came into effect on 7 May.  It brings to an end the use of the injection and comes months after AstraZeneca admitted for the first time in court documents that it can cause “rare” and dangerous blood clots.

The Oxford-AstraZeneca injection was sold under the brand names Vaxzevria in Europe and Covishield in India.

As reported by The Telegraph on Tuesday, the pharmaceutical giant said its covid injection was being removed from markets for commercial reasons. The company reported a decrease in the demand for Vaxzevria due to emerging covid variant vaccines and initiated the global withdrawal of its covid vaccine on 7 May, following the increased availability of newer vaccines.

In response to AstraZeneca’s decision to withdraw Vaxzevria, the Serum Institute of India said on Wednesday that “from the outset, [it] had disclosed all rare and very rare side effects” of its Covishield vaccine in 2021.

Professors Martin Neil and Norman Fenton remind us that in March 2021 – four months after the mass covid injection campaigns began – the alarm bells of the harmful effects of the injections were already being rung while corporate media hailed the Oxford covid vaccine as “100% effective.”

Before we get to the two professors, a word of caution. A paper published in Nature Nanotechnology on Monday, the day before AstraZeneca withdrew its covid vaccine, shows that AstraZeneca may be withdrawing from the covid vaccine market but Oxford University is not.  

It is claimed that covid is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a coronavirus. Before the covid era madness, it was known that there are seven coronaviruses that infect humans.  Coronaviruses were first identified in the 1960s but have likely been circulating for centuries, causing common colds.  It’s important to note that included in the seven that infect humans are three so-called “new” coronaviruses – SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 – of which at least two are known to have nefarious origins. In an attempt to hide the “new” coronaviruses true origins it has been claimed:

  • SARS-CoV, which caused the 2002-2004 SARS outbreak, is thought to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being civet cats.
  • MERS-CoV, which causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, is believed to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being dromedary camels.
  • SARS-CoV-2, which causes covid-19, is thought to have originated from bats, with the intermediate host being an unknown animal, possibly a pangolin or another animal.

Read more: Operation Warp Speed? Pfizer patented the spike protein for a coronavirus vaccine over 30 years ago

In a collaboration between the universities of Oxford, Cambridge and California Institute of Technology, researchers have developed a vaccine with a new approach called “proactive vaccinology,” where a vaccine is developed before the disease-causing pathogen even emerges.  The vaccine, “Quartet Nanocage,” is expected to commence phase one clinical trials in early 2025.

According to Mint, the new vaccine functions by instructing the body’s immune system to identify particular regions of eight distinct coronaviruses, encompassing SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and several strains presently prevalent in bats, which hold the potential to cross over to humans and trigger a pandemic.

The University of Oxford’s Rory Hills, the first author of the report, said, “Our focus is to create a vaccine that will protect us against the next coronavirus pandemic and have it ready before the pandemic has even started.”

“We are also applying this technology to protect against other groups of viruses that can infect humans. All of this brings us closer to our vision of developing a library of vaccines against viruses with pandemic potential before they have had the opportunity to cross over into humans,” Hills said.

Now let’s remind ourselves of their previous attempt to develop and market a “safe and effective” coronavirus vaccine.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Vaccine Efficacy and Safety: A Timely Reminder of Our Early Warnings

By Professor Martin Neil and Professor Norman Fenton

With the formal withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine, it’s appropriate to remind people of this double-page spread in The Times, March 2021, that hailed the AstraZeneca vaccine as 100% effective. But note the article highlighted bottom right on the double-page spread.

This is the article by Tom Whipple with the headline: ‘Academics back ‘bizarre’ claim that jabs may kill’.

Two of the four “Queen Mary University of London” academics were Norman and Martin. The online version of this article explicitly named Norman as one of the academics:

While we are proud that we did indeed raise the alarm about safety issues with the covid vaccines so early on, Whipple’s article was inaccurate in many respects as detailed HERE. Moreover, it was used as the basis for Norman’s Wikipedia entry to be hacked with him being labelled as spreading “covid-19 misinformation.” 

Read more: How Wikipedia defames and delegitimises anybody raising concerns against the WHO narrative on Covid

While AstraZeneca may only have just been formally withdrawn, few are aware that general practitioners were no longer offering it in the UK as early as the end of May 2021 because of safety issues – you could still get it in principle but had to specifically request it. That was weeks before Sarah Gilbert got that standing ovation at Wimbledon for leading the AstraZeneca development.

Read more: AstraZeneca’s second most lethal batch

About the Authors

Norman Fenton is a Professor Emeritus of Risk Information Management at the Queen Mary University of London.  He is also a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems. He is a mathematician by training whose current focus is on critical decision-making and, in particular, on quantifying uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks).  The approach can be summarized as “smart data rather than big data.”

Martin Neil is a renowned expert in the fields of Computer Science and Statistics. He is a full Professor at Queen Mary, University of London, where he is also the Director of the UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in Safe and Trusted AI. His research interests focus on Bayesian modelling and risk quantification in various areas, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science.

Together, the two professors author a Substack page titled ‘Where Are the Numbers’.

Featured image: Professor Sarah Gilbert, Professor of Vaccinology at the Jenner Institute (right).  Source: The story behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine success, UK Research and Innovation, 30 November 2021


If you like our work please consider to donate :


If you are looking for solutions (lawyer, form, gathering, action, antidote, treatments, maybe this could help you:

If you want to fight back better:

Find the others:

The Time for Silence is Over

If you are a doctor or medical professional and you are reading this and aware of what is happening, the time for you to stay silent on account of self-preservation is over. The weight of what you know vs. a license, a job, etc., is too great. “Just following orders” or fear of scrutiny won’t cut it anymore. Several have come before you to lay the groundwork so you, too, can be brave.

If you are the every-man, there are still people you haven’t spoken to. Call them today. Don’t wait. Prepare your information, and get it ready for an email or text. Sit with them and discuss it. Have them over. Watch an interview or seminar. Make them stay out of respect for you because you are respecting them; you are trying to save their life.

If you are the every-man with a bit more nerve, go stand outside of your nearest school with a packet of information to hand out to parents on the car line. Do it until they threaten to arrest you, and get arrested if you must. It is that serious. It must be done. Go to a mall and flier the windshields of every car in the parking lot. Create a landing page or send people to a reputable site with the needed information. Get your boots on the ground. Do it today. Do not wait. Your fellow human needs you right now.

We are in the midst of one of the greatest psychological operations in human history.

The third step is to unsubscribe from all mainstream media outlets. Delete the apps from your phone, laptop, and tablet and unfollow all of their social media and YouTube channels. Try to avoid mainstream media for at least one week, even if the headline is intriguing.

In the same time why not removing all the big tech tracking/spying/social credit system around you: (Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tik Tok, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Whatsapp, Zoom, Linkedln, Snapchat, Tumblr, Pinterest, Reddit, Myspace, etc.)

The fourth step of the global walkout is to move as many accounts as you can to a union or local bank.

Spike Protein Protocol 

McCullough MD (aug 2023):

He recommended three supplements to mitigate harm and degrade spike proteins:

1. Nattokinase – 2000 units twice a day. Breaks down spike protein.
2. Bromelain – 500 milligrams once a day. Also breaks down spike protein.
3. Curcumin – 500 milligrams twice a day. Reduces inflammation and spike protein damage.

Glutathione (most important for body detoxification) or better
NAC = N-Acetyl-Cysteine 600-750mg (causes the body to produce glutathione itself)
Astaxantin 5mg (also improves vision)
vitamin D3
Milk thistle (also liver and stomach protection)
Melatonin 1mg to 10mg (against 5G)
Alternatively CDS/CDL and zeolite

Myocarditis: Nicotine

Dr. Zelenko’s Protocol contains Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Zinc, Vitamin D3, and Quercetin.

Fasting cures everything!

How to find the truth :

Search engine:,, Searx (choose the server that you want) or

Facebook style: or



You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes