Bilderberg 2012: Ken Clarke’s drive of shame

  • Print

    The Alex Jones Channel
    Alex Jones Show podcast
    Prison Planet TV
    Infowars.com Twitter
    Alex Jones' Facebook
    Infowars store

Charlie Skelton
London Guardian
June 4, 2012

Ken Clarke was the last man out. I’m not surprised he was late up. Britain’s lord chancellor had the beery sheen and aspirin eyes of a man who’d found the closing banquet of Bilderberg 2012 more than usually chillaxing. He looks like he’s been pulled through a hedge fund backwards. I’m not even sure he’s wearing trousers.

Poor Ken. It can’t be easy for him, trying to reconcile being an MP, the minister for justice and a member of Bilderberg’s steering committee. Imagine having interests so conflicted. No wonder if he’s got a sweat on. Plus, he’s trying his best to champion transparency, trumpeting it as “the most effective public inoculation against corruption that any country can have”, while refusing to talk about the Bilderberg conference or any of the steering committee meetings.

Back in 1994, Clarke thundered in parliament about “the desirability of greater transparency of decisions on monetary policy”, but these days he’s having to thrash it out in private with the heads of the major banks. What a nightmare.

Full article here

Print
Print this page.

Comment Rules


13 Responses to “Bilderberg 2012: Ken Clarke’s drive of shame”

  1. Is that why he doesn’t believe in custodial sentences? How very Nu-Labour.

  2. Clarkey reminds me of the cookie monster but minus the charm

  3. He’s looking a little depressed, probably after hearing what the Bilderberg wingnuts are proposing. As if slowly killing folks with tobacco wasn’t enough!

    Vic Reply:
    June 4th, 2012 at 10:53 am

    admit ” the smokers did it to themselves no?” just like the drug addics do it to themselves?
    stop taking the poisons in the first place. blaming others does not take away our responsabilities to the decisions we make about all this .

    Vic Reply:
    June 4th, 2012 at 10:54 am

    this is what is meant by : ” feeding the beast” we all do it a different levels but we all need to descern how we do it?

    Vic Reply:
    June 4th, 2012 at 10:55 am

    it is like saying I know good from evil and unable to truly descern it?????

    I can say I love you all day all year, but if I do not know what love is trully whats it worth?

  4. I enjoyed meeting you all.

    Assuredly “they” are about to deploy a much stronger batch of datura, perhaps even contouring the projection of fear onto the faces/”digital identities” of InfoWarriors.

    Sorry for the oppression that came out of my gaze, but the spiritually perceptive should now realize just what type of powers are operating here now.

  5. Of course Clarke is like that. He is a politician. Almost all of them are like this. They say one thing and do the opposite, so what is new. The only one who practices what he preaches for the most part is Ron Paul. That is why they hate him so much in large part. You can’t buy off a man like him or murder him because it only leads to what has happened with their murdering Kennedy.

  6. Lol.. “I’m not even sure he’s wearing trousers”

    dncholas Reply:
    June 4th, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    Probably just got raped.

    “He looks like he’s been pulled through a hedge fund backwards”

    ..funny

  7. He looks like he has a stinkin’ hangover. I like the picture of some of the Bilderbergers because it shows they were taken outside the Marriott. That means they could hear the BLASTING loud chants like: SCUM, SCUM, SCUM! 🙂

  8. Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate.’ This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition! The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.

    Melsdude Reply:
    June 4th, 2012 at 1:38 pm

    Evey: I’m upset? You just said you killed Lewis Prothero!

    V: I might have killed the Fingermen who attacked you, but I heard no objection then.

    Evey: What?

    V: Violence can be used for good.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes