Chomsky: Ron Paul is right about al Qaeda

September 14th, 2011

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Raw Story
Sept 14, 2011

Chomsky agreed with Paul’s assessment about al Qaeda’s stated motives for attacking the U.S. on Sept. 11, 2001: it’s not American freedom or the nature of its society, it was U.S. policies that drove them to such a savage attack.

Full article here

Print this page.

Comment Rules

29 Responses to “Chomsky: Ron Paul is right about al Qaeda”

Since Obama is murdering Libyans
in support of the al Qaeda take over
of Libya…….does that mean obama
supports the 911 attacks

emus Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 10:26 am

Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman sound like those Jewish led socialist party members who pretend to be against wars on Muslim nations but always leave a tool for the warmongers to start the war. people like them are partners in crimes with the western war profiteers. Those socialists very cunningly shift blames where it doesn’t lie and provide a reason to westerners to hate Muslims. they play a double game. but people are waking up to their Jewish tricks. Firstly, they claim Muslim extremists were responsible for 911 and then claim that 911 is a smaller crimes compared to what America does all over the world. but we want to know about 911 and they are trying to hoodwink people. for example they would say things like, “US imperialism is responsible for people to get angry and take desperate actions. even though some Muslim extremists were responsible for 911 they don’t represent Islam or Muslims in general.” they think they are so clever and can hide their true face by sounding nice to “Muslim extremists”. they are well aware of the fact that all these so called terror attacks are intelligence operations. They know once they admit that, there would be no justifications for wars. Noam Chomsky is just a fake hero of the left.
Chomsky still wants you to believe Al Qaeda brought down the World Trade Center and that the Mossad and the CIA participation is fiction. Chomsky’s personal worth is over $15 million and his second home is in Israel, land of the theives. Chomsky has no more validity than Bibi Netanyahu.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 10:55 am

CIA – CAUSES IT ALL.

roberth70 Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 11:18 am

Well you’ve got half of it right. The Mossad played a very big roll……do the research.

Tom Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 11:37 am

Yeah? What “research” brings the Mossad into all of this?

roberth70 Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:01 pm

The reseach that you’ve clearly avoided to do Tom. Being a Zionist means that no matter how much information surfaces you will religiously avoid it if in any way it implicates Isreal. Personally I don’t think you can be trusted to give us the time of day. Your a lying Zionazi with no credibility whatsoever. For other readers who’ve had a problem putting a face on the perps, search the internet to your hearts content. But make sure you’ve brought your lunch, because the amount of information on the internet is massive.

armmewithinfo Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 2:11 pm

@roberth70-so equally massive is the amout of MIS-information on the internet as well.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:05 pm

roberth70: Chomsky still wants you to believe Al Qaeda brought down the World Trade Center and that the Mossad and the CIA participation is fiction.

between_the_lines: Ron Paul too.

roberth70: Chomsky’s personal worth is over $15 million and his second home is in Israel, land of the theives. Chomsky has no more validity than Bibi Netanyahu.

between_the_lines: And Ron Paul has no more validity than Chomsky or Netanyahu.
All 3 serve the Jewish International Bankers in their war to financially colonize the world, only in different roles: Netanyahu as Khayyal, Chomsky as Sayan, Paul as Shabbat Goy.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 1:18 pm

MISCREDITED QUOTE CORRECTED:
roberth70: And Ron Paul has no more validity than Chomsky or Netanyahu.

between_the_lines: All 3 serve the Jewish International Bankers in their war to financially colonize the world, only in different roles: Netanyahu as Khayyal, Chomsky as Sayan, Paul as Shabbat Goy.

Peter Wolf Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

At this point no one is exactly sure what RP thinks about 9/11 and he either buys into the official story or he is just playing the game and doesnt want the very negative backlash that will result from going against the official story.If its the latter then its the right thing to do for now since he is in the running and like it or not openly saying the govt is lying would alienate RP from mainstream voters as RP has successfully moved from being a fringe candidate to one with mass appeal.

As for Noam Chomsky he is right and wrong.Right about US foreign policy creating a backlash and wrong about US foreign policy being responsible for 9/11 which was really cover for it being an inside job and also plausable deniability.

As for Noam Chomsky i find that he is vastly overrated and is one of these establishment figures that you are told is very clever so those that listen to Noam usually dont know any better.Noam is what is known as a gatekeeper who just repeats establishment viewpoints which are lapped up by the weakminded who think they are listening to something of intellectual value.He is idolised by the Left so the fact that he talks shit comes with the territory.
I have no real interest in listening to Noam and never have.I am also not saying that everything he says is wrong but the fact he falls short on this topic despite all of the evidence that is available means that he doesnt have any credibility AFAIAC.

Everyone has their ownb opinion as is their right but the opinion of Noam Chomsky is of no interest to me as i dont care what he thinks.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 3:50 pm

Peter Wolf: no one is exactly sure what RP thinks about 9/11 and he either buys into the official story or he is just playing the game and doesnt want the very negative backlash that will result from going against the official story.

between_the_lines: If he were playing a game to avoid a “negative backlash”, that “negative backlash” would ultimately come down to “loss of votes”.
It would mean:
• Ron Paul lies to voters to get their votes – that is his platform is based on fraud.
• Ron Paul thinks voters can’t be trusted to think for themselves.
Huh, Ron Paul is beating the dead horse Al CIA da? Bin Laden and Al CIA da didn’t do 9/11. Personally I don’t believe Ron beleives any of it. He just has to play their game long enough to get power.

Billo Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 10:10 am

correction. I do believe the CIA had a part in 9/11. Their wholly owned subsiary al CID duh is their boogie man fall guy and now mercenary group.

Tom Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 11:38 am

Exactly. Ron Paul knows better than to investigate 9/11 before he reaches power. Besides, he’s already pushing the FED audit, which alone is enough to get him a double tap to the back of the heaad.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:10 pm

Tom: Ron Paul knows better than to investigate 9/11 before he reaches power.

between_the_lines: If he doesn’t mean what he says, then he is lying to the voters who believe what he says, and gaining their votes by fraud.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

Tom: ..he’s already pushing the FED audit

between_the_lines: Ron Paul is not against “the Fed”(1) on principle. He is not against the principle of private currency rather than government-owned currency. He is in favor of MORE private currencies and NO government currency. His complaint against the Fed has nothing to do with private currency vs government currency. His complaint against the Fed is only in the details of how they manage their business. For example: he says he wants to audit “the Fed” to see if they mismanaged government TARP(2) funds, and if they did, he could take away their right to create private currency out of thin air lend it to the government at interest, and transfer that right to OTHER PRIVATE BANKS.

___________
FOOTNOTES:
(1)”The Fed”=a group of 12 private banks and their group organization, with the government-granted sole right to create U.S. legal tender(except coins).
(2) TARP=”Troubled Asset Relief Program”

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:28 pm

Ron Paul completely disagrees with Thomas Jefferson when he said:

“If the American people ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied.”

“The [CURRENCY-]issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”

Ron Paul’s version is: “The [CURRENCY] issuing power should be taken from one bank and restored to others.”
He is a Historian who said when asked about 9/11 truth “he doesn’t like to deal with the past” LOL…that is one of the all-time great avoidance answers to the We Are Change guys.

roberth70 Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:10 pm

Yep, Chomsky wants us to get over it and move on. Very Zionist of him don’t you think? We’ll get over it when we have real justice and not until. Go home Chomsky, go back to your beloved Israel and join your fellow thieves, liars and murderers.
gee, thanks noam…
my grandma was a better fuddy-duddy than you…
some folks need confirmation(security)
otherwise, you would be on the relic shelf…
what a shame for such an intelligent dude…
(you’re all moldy…and shilly)

Billo Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 11:26 am

He sold his soul already. No credability.

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

Ron Paul too..
Chomsky would condemn America first whether or not 9/11 was allowed to go forward, or was an actual inside job, or was what it was made out to be.
Noam Chomsky is an American hater. I hope we can restore our nation to what it was when Chomsky first started hating it!

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

Ron Paul too
Someone doth protest about Ron Paul a little TOO much…

between_the_lines Reply:
September 14th, 2011 at 2:21 pm

Ad-hominem response.
To be taken seriously you need to say WHO you disagree with, and WHAT he said that you disagree with, and WHY you disagree with it.
Yeah, I’m not listening to Chomsky’s opportunistic way of getting his foot in the door on this one. I’m not buying into anything about 9-11 until somebody explains to me how a 1300 foot steel tower can fall down in 10 seconds, knowing the fact the concrete had to turn to dust within 2 seconds to allow this to happen. No Al Qaeda, no Binny and the Jets, no more bullshit !
teeeeest