RSS Feed
May 19th, 2021 
Awake Goy Dangerous mRNA “vaccine” injections now being required for the “Fauci virus.”
A medical doctor in a Texas State Senate committee hearing testified that the reason that animal trials of Pfizer/Moderna mRNA injections had been stopped was that too many animals were dying. The doctor, Dr. Angelina Farella, is a 25-year pediatrician based in Houston.
NIH documents now show that dangerous gain-of-function research banned in US labs was outsourced to the Wuhan lab with Dr. Fauci’s approval, prompting some to now call it the “Fauci virus.”
[Full Committee hearing, Texas Senate website]
Although the original clinical trials protocols submitted to the FDA by Moderna and Pfizer call for rigorous, closely monitored trials lasting into 2022, FDA “emergency use authorization” has allowed the novel mRNA biological agents, never before approved for market use on humans, to be administered widely to anyone without pre-screening or systematic follow-up.
According to the medical research consultant Antidote, which specializes in clinical trials, typically a drug or treatment undergoes three to six years of in vitro studies and animal trials, largely for safety, before moving on to humans. In “How long do clinical trial phases take?” Antodote writes:
“Before a potential treatment reaches the clinical trial stage, scientists research ideas in what is called the discovery phase. This step can take from three to six years. Typically, researchers will test a potential new treatment in animals before moving on to the first stage of clinical testing in humans.”
In her testimony, Dr. Farella is questioned by Texas State Senator Bob Hall, who asks:
“Has there been another vaccine that had the high incidents of serious hospitalizations and deaths that this vaccine is now showing?
Dr. Farella: “Not to this extent. Not even close.”
Sen. Hall: “Any other vaccine would’ve been pulled from the market?”
Dr. Farella: “Absolutely.”
Sen. Hall: “Have you seen any other vaccine that was put out to the public that skipped the animal test?”
Dr. Farella: “Never before.”
Sen. Hall: “As I have read, they actually started the animal tests, and because the animals were dying, they stopped the tests.”
Dr. Farella: “Correct.”
It is not clear where Dr. Farella is getting her information. But it is clear that animal trials for the Pfizer and Moderna injections were halted in the Fall of 2020, even though much valuable information concerning long-term side effects is only gained though the normal three to six years of animal trials. Why these would be halted is a mystery.
The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years.
The number of deaths possibly related to the COVID injections which have been reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is now over 3,000 in the US, approximately one-third of them within 48 hours of receiving the shots. Although the pharma companies deny any causal relation, requests for medical reports and autopsies to confirm this have been ignored.
In 1976 the Swine Flu vaccine program in the US, which was administered to 40 million Americans, 25% of the population, was halted after 25 possibly related deaths.
Animal Trials Halted in November, Human Trials Supposed to Last into 2022
Last November 9th PETA, the animal rights organization, hinted that “lengthy” animal trials had been done away with. Its chief scientist wrote in a press release applauding a Pfizer announcement:
“The message for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is clear: Improve vaccine research by removing the requirement for lengthy animal trials.”
Then on November 17th, Reuters wrote in a cheerleading piece for Pfizer and Moderna, “How two companies sprinted ahead in extraordinary race for a COVID vaccine.” The article said:
“Both companies recognized that mRNA vaccines work very differently in animals compared to humans. For that reason, after doing preliminary animal studies to ensure vaccine candidates were safe, they pared back additional animal studies…”
A November 25, 2020 AP “Fact Check” dealing with animal trials for the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA injections addresses an assertion that “Pfizer and Moderna did not skip animal trials.”
The “Fact Check” reads:
“Posts online appeared to suggest that the animal trial phase was skipped completely when testing the two vaccines. “
Typically of such fact-checks, the proposition is misrepresented, then easily disproven. The proposition is misrepresented as that animal trials were “skipped completely.” But the real issue is whether they were drastically cut short, especially for a novel, never-approved technology.
Both the Pfizer and Moderna shots have two full years of clinical trials scheduled into their protocols which were submitted to the FDA, lasting well into 2022. This means that any attempt by the FDA to grant general approval before that, beyond emergency use authorization, would be in violation of the safety protocols that the FDA itself approved.
Moderna’s Chief Science Officer Tal Zak openly admitted that the injection skipped normal years of animal trials when he said:
“I don’t think proving this in an animal model is on the critical path to getting this to a clinical trial,”
According to a study of the Pfizer animal trials by Dr. Valerie Donaldson, a Pittsburgh internist, Pfizer animal trials consisted of 18 macaques and 24 mice, for 56 and 28 days, respectively.
Documents: [Pfizer protocol submitted to FDA] [Moderna protocol submitted to FDA]
Below: Page from Pfizer clinical trials protocol submitted to FDA, showing two-year safety and efficacy trials lasting into 2022. Source
mRNA Technology and Coronavirus Vaccines in General Have Always Been Problematic
Many doctors and scientists are aghast that the values involved in a space race, “Operation Warp Speed,” are being applied to something as fragile and still-mysterious as the human body. In a space race only a few astronauts, likely with military backgrounds, fully informed and understanding high levels of risk, are putting their lives on the line.
On the other hand, Moderna has admitted that young children are, in essence, test subjects for substances for which long-term safety is unknown. In a stomach-churning report this March which met with no outrage from moral or ethical leaders, Reuters reported matter-of-factly:
“Moderna Inc has begun dosing patients in a mid-to-late stage study of its Covid-19 vaccine, mRNA-1273, in children aged six months to less than 12 years, the company said on Tuesday. The study will assess the safety and effectiveness of two doses of mRNA-1273 given 28 days apart and intends to enroll about 6,750 children in the United States and Canada.”
Children, and indeed most adults, have a lesser chance of dying of COVID than of flu. mRNA injections are a complete unknown in the long -run.
Below: COVID is Not Very Deadly Relative to Other Viruses source: Bloomberg News
mRNA agents given to people with autoimmune issues has also been a problem. A December 2020 article in MedPage Today relates:
“A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity…Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.”
In December, British health officials of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection. The advice applied to “any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicines or food.”
The health authority warned of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
CBS News reported in December:
“England’s National Health Service warned on Wednesday that people “with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food” should not be given the COVID-19 vaccine developed by U.S. pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and Germany’s BioTech.”
Yet, incredibly, no pre-screening is done in the present mass mRNA injection roll-out, and rewards like boxes of donuts are handed out to all-comers, no questions asked.
In a February 2021 interview, Dr. Lee Merritt, a member of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLD,) a savagely attacked contingent of doctors holding that the lockdowns were unnecessary and the present COVID injections are unsafe, said that upon deliberate reinfection after a time with coronaviruses, most mRNA test animals died of sepsis and organ failure (below.)
Underscoring divisions in the medical community, offices such as McGill University’s Office for Science and Society attack Dr. Merritt and AFLD for things such as “a sordid history of attacking Dr. Fauci’s sound scientific advice,” in an insult-filled rant.
Meanwhile, contrary to the FDA’s and Big Tech, Big Media, and Big Pharma assertions that the “Pfizer” and “Moderna” are safe, a University of Pennsylvania Medical Center paper concludes, in December 2020, that:
“Direct evidence on the comparative safety of mRNA vaccines and other vaccines is lacking.”
Just two of the more prominent calls for a halt to mass “vaccinations” (a term the doctors dispute is accurate) are here, and here.
Even before mRNA technology, coronavirus vaccine development has always been problematic.
The biotech industry newsletter Biopharma Dive writes:
“There has never been a vaccine for any coronavirus. And many vaccine developers have based their designs on previous research into other coronaviruses, like SARS or MERS, which share genetic similarities with SARS-CoV-2, but differences as well. Much still remains unknown about the novel coronavirus, and how our bodies respond to infection.”
The UK Independent reported last year:
“A successful vaccine has never been developed for any of the many strains of coronaviruses, due to the nature of the virus itself; and vaccinated people can have a higher chance of serious illness and death when later exposed to another strain of the virus, a phenomenon known as ‘virus interference.’ An earlier SARS vaccine never made it to market because the laboratory animals it was tested on contracted more serious symptoms on re-infection, and most of them died.”
. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder of Children’s Health Defense, writes:
“Scientists first attempted to develop coronavirus vaccines after China’s 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak. Teams of US & foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs. Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1960s. Two children died.”
Many doctors and scientists, whose voices have been silenced, see no need for a vaccine at all for a 99.8% survival rate virus, overall, and 96% for people over 70. Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, Dr. Mike Yeadon, says:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.”
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects,”
Although it is frequently compared to the Spanish Flu of 1918, in global deaths per capita, COVID nowhere near, and more similar to the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics, which few in the general population even knew about, and never prompted talk of masks or lockkdowns.
The Murderous HCQ and Ivermectin Lies
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ,) reported to have met with great success in treating COVID by thousands of doctors around the world, is characterized by Dr. Anthony Fauci and the FDA as dangerous. But this is based on a study which pumped six times recommended dose into some test subjects. On this Brazilian study was based the FDA’s persecution of American doctors wanting to prescribe careful protocols including HCQ, like many doctors reporting exciting results elsewhere.
In the faulty Brazilian trial, massive dosages of HCQ were being administered to COVID patients, as much as 1200 mg a day for 10 days, or 12,000 mg. The upper-end dose for Plaquenil (HCQ) for the treatment of malaria is 2,000 mg, according to directions which read:
“Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.“
Naturally heart palpitations – heart arrhythmia – would result.
Last June the prestigious medical journal The Lancet was forced to retract an article which concluded that HCQ did not help to curb COVID-19, and might cause death in patients. It turned out the data was faked. Even Facebook “fact check” has reversed its position that HCQ could cause “imminent harm,” a half million lives later.
Similarly, it is now emerging that the safe, cheap anti-parasite drug used by hundreds of millions every year, Ivermectin, used properly, is shown to cut COVID mortality by as much as 70%.
Below: HCQ vs. Non-HCQ Countries Source: HCQTrial.com
Wither and Why
Combined with the almost certain conclusion now that the origins of COVID are man-made, one must ask “why?”
It behooves mankind now to pay attention to the most powerful men on the planet when they talk about pandemics, even if they are not scientists. By a system of vaccine passports, total surveillance, and non-existent individual liberties or rights to organize, ultra-wealthy elites have much to gain. Perhaps this is behind such mytserious foreknowledge as seems to be possessed by those such as Bill Gates, who said last year that there will be more pandemics, bigger than the last, and that the next one “WILL get attention.”
Bill Gates in documentary: The next pandemic “WILL get attention.” (View Clip on Bitchute) (Full documentary on Gates)
Posted in 
Tags: 
