Jew World Order

Marriage has always been universally
understood as a biological, social, and economic arrangement to bring
into the world and rear the young, thus perpetuating the species. 
Indeed, humans took their cue from wild nature, where heterosexual
family is virtually the sole organizing principle of life. ~ Victor Volsky

It
is the iron law of “progressive” movements that having achieved their
goals, they refuse to fade away.  Rather than disbanding upon completion
of their mission, these movements, now fully institutionalized, keep
chugging along, and the farther they go, the more they resemble their
sworn enemies, the rationale for their existence.

The
labor movement that arose as a desperate defense against unbridled
exploitation has degenerated into a stultifying, mafia-style monopoly
whose grip on any business dooms that business to slow strangulation.
 The civil rights movement emerged to fight discrimination. 

As its
baton passed from Martin Luther King, Jr. to the likes of Jesse Jackson
and Al Sharpton, the movement’s main motto transmogrified from equality
— i.e., abolition of white privilege — into affirmative action —
i.e., establishment of black privilege.  Equality has come to be
denigrated by the new self-appointed civil rights elite as a
particularly insidious form of racial discrimination.  

Feminism born of a
legitimate earning for equal rights and dignity has turned into a
female supremacy movement implacably hostile to the “patriarchy” —
i.e., the traditional social structure.

The
gay rights movement, too, has been transforming itself before our very
eyes.  Once a movement fighting against persecution and discrimination,
which is the reason why its initial demands enjoyed wide public support,
it has gone from one triumph to another and won the war.  

Today, the
issue is moot.  The gay movement has not declared victory and gone
home.  Central to achieving their goal is bending society to their will
and forcing it to acquiesce to their agenda.

That’s
where same-sex marriage comes in.  It’s no mystery why it commands
considerable support.  After all, what can be more “American” than the
idea of granting equality to a formerly persecuted group that has done
nothing untoward other than being different in its sexual proclivities?
 

Sort of like being discriminated because of the color of one’s skin
(even though many black leaders, jealously guarding their highly
lucrative victimhood, take strong exception to equating gay liberation
with the civil rights struggle).  

So recognition of gay unions as
legitimate marriages seems to be an eminently innocuous idea.  But
appearances can be deceptive.  Few things are more destructive than gay
marriage, a poison pill devised to corrode the very core of a healthy
society — the institution of marriage.

Not
a single society in the long history of mankind has ever attempted to
substitute homosexual relationships for traditional marriage.  

Even in
places where homosexuality was viewed as normal, openly practiced, and
even encouraged (as in Sparta, where carnal relationship was regarded as
forging an extra bond between warriors), marriage was sacrosanct and
never called into question.  

Marriage has always been universally
understood as a biological, social, and economic arrangement to bring
into the world and rear the young, thus perpetuating the species. 
Indeed, humans took their cue from wild nature, where heterosexual
family is virtually the sole organizing principle of life.

The
rare exceptions only prove the rule, as do stable childless marriages
held together by considerations of economic necessity or social
convenience.  

Indeed, so central is marriage to human existence that it
forms the basic building block and prototype of any society.  

The many
forms of social organization are but permutations of the basic familial
pattern; the clan, the tribe and the state are merely an extended family
writ large.

Don’t
believe revolutionaries when they hold forth about their intention of
building paradise on earth.  Actually, they would be unable to build
anything even if they wanted to.  

Their talk about the bright future is
mere lip service, because in reality, any revolution is exclusively
about destruction, with very little thought given to what will happen
afterward (“we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it”). 

How do
you go about destroying society?  Where do you direct the blow so it
will do the most damage?  In his Theses on Feuerbach, Karl Marx provided the answer: destroy the traditional family.

True
to the teachings of their prophet, socialist revolutionaries have
placed the destruction of matrimony high on their list of priorities.
 Social upheavals have always opened the floodgates of debauchery and
pornography.  

The socialist revolution brings about a breakdown of
social conventions, with “sexual liberation” regarded as part of the
overall drive for freedom. 

While the rabble yearns to throw off the
yoke of moral strictures to give vent to its animal passions, the
revolutionary leaders see moral decay as a means of undermining the
bulwark of the social structure — the family.

Radical
movements are merely battalions of the revolutionary army, each charged
with a particular subversive task.  

Undoubtedly, the overwhelming
majority of rank-and-file gays are well-meaning people who have
sincerely bought into the myth peddled by their leaders that the
marriage license is the ultimate token of recognition of their normalcy.
 They know not what they are doing. 

The wizards behind the curtain
know better, and there shouldn’t be any illusions about their
intentions: they want nothing less than to bring down the capitalist
system, and they view their movement as a battering ram to shatter its
principal bastion, America.  Bringing down the traditional family is a
crucial step in that direction.

Why is gay marriage inimical to the traditional matrimony?  

How does
society suffer if it gives legal sanction to the cohabitation of gay
couples and bestows upon them the rights traditionally granted to
spouses?  

In short, an approach based on individual rights is a bum
steer.  Legalization of same-sex marriage compromises the institution of
marriage and thus undermines the family built on the foundation of
marriage.  

It
has been known since the dawn of history that a family unit consisting
of a man and a woman is the best nurturing environment for the children.
 According to the research center Child Trends,
“[r]esearch confirms that children develop best in families formed by
both biological parents in a low-conflict marriage.”  

Even the
best-intentioned gay couples raising children shortchange their wards. The most militant gay leaders are not well-meaning.  Just as the
radical leftists started out on their Great March through the
Institutions with schools and colleges as their primary targets…

(“We’ll
get you through your children,” the radical leftist and gay poet Allen
Ginsberg warned his erstwhile friend Norman Podhoretz)

…gay militants
have children in their cross-hairs.  A nationwide organization, The Gay,
Lesbian and Straight Education Network, openly acknowledges that its
objective is to promote a positive view of homosexuality among pre-teen
and teenage students.

Aside
from the tremendous damage same-sex marriage does to the well-being and
normal development of children, by offering an alternative to a bedrock
institution, gay marriage calls into question all traditional values.
 

There is a strong correlation between the rise of homosexual marriage
and the weakening of traditional matrimony.  David Blankenhorn
observes,

“The deep logic of same-sex marriage is clearly consistent
with what scholars call deinstitutionalization — the overturning or
weakening of all of the customary forms of marriage, and the dramatic
shrinking of marriage’s public meaning and institutional authority. Does
deinstitutionalization necessarily require gay marriage? Apparently
not. For decades heterosexuals have been doing a fine job on that front
all by themselves. But gay marriage clearly presupposes and reinforces
deinstitutionalization.”  

Marx’s loyal cohort Friedrich Engels, in his influential work, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the States,
disclosed the game plan in a single, succinct proposition: change the
concept of matrimony, and the traditional family will cease to exist.  Once the family is gone, society will fall apart.  

Knock out the
cornerstone, and the whole edifice will crumble, which is precisely the
ultimate goal of the revolutionary movement…

Victor Volsky – May 27, 2012 – AmericanThinker

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook