RSS Feed
November 2nd, 2011 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda 
Eric Blair
Activist Post
November 1, 2011
For the next two days, leaders from around the globe will collude with tech giants to discuss how to respond to the challenges and opportunities of the Internet. Translation: they’ll be negotiating a global Internet treaty.
It’s reported that officials from 60 countries will join Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Tudou.com (Chinese video sharing site), as well as cyber crime agencies, and computer security firms at the London Conference on Cyberspace.
The London summit is hosted by Foreign Secretary, William Hague, who said the purpose is to “discuss ideas and expected behaviour in cyberspace”.
To which he claims the goal is bring together major players to determine how “collectively, we should respond to the challenges and opportunities which the development of cyberspace presents.”
A few days before the conference, Council on Foreign Relations members Adam Segal and Matthew Waxman wrote that the conference presents those calling for a global Internet treaty with “a step in that direction.”
They also pointed out that NATO allies have already essentially agreed to a treaty; “June 2011, NATO defense ministers agreed to a collective vision of cyber defense, and the United States and Australia recently announced that their mutual defense treaty extends to cyberspace.”
Meanwhile, in September of this year, an alliance between Russia, China, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan collaborated on cybersecurity by introducing The International Code of Conduct for Information Security to the U.N. Secretary General.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
This alliance views “information security” to mean combating the dissemination of certain types of information which “undermines other countries’ political, economic and social stability, as well as their spiritual and cultural environment.” In other words, if passed, political dissent on the Internet would be censored by U.N. decree.
Analysts explained the power struggle to be that Western states want to protect their networks from cyber attacks, while China and Russia seek security of information, which means controlling content.
Western powers will preach Internet freedom to their counterparts at this conference, yet they themselves have engaged in draconian measures like arbitrarily seizing websites for merely linking to copyrighted material and ordering politically “harmful” material removed from websites like YouTube. Also, in a blatant act of censorship, they infamously colluded with Amazon to drop hosting service to WikiLeaks.
What’s more, multiple bills are floating in the U.S. Congress that seek further control over the Internet like the recent “rogue websites” bill which one Representative called the “end of the Internet.” At the same time, the new net neutrality rules initiated without Congress, rather by the FCC with a 3-2 vote (where one commissioner was rewarded with a cushy job at Comcast), go into effect on November 20th.
So, while they talk a good game about protecting free speech, the U.S. and other Western powers seem to have similar ambitions to censor the Internet as China and Russia do, each already using private Internet cartels to do their dirty work. Therefore, they’re likely not as far off from agreeing on a treaty as the mainstream press is letting on.
Where they may not agree, however, is how to respond to potential cyber crimes and suspected threats.
China, while strongly denying any government involvement, has been blamed for many recent cyber attacks. Therefore, China, and most others, tend to take the approach of prosecuting cyber crimes through a legal process.
The Pentagon, on the other hand, in their recently released cybersecurity strategy, said the military would be “prepared to respond to hostile acts in cyberspace.”
“The United States reserves the right, under the laws of armed conflict, to respond to serious cyber attacks with a proportional and justified military response at the time and place of our choosing,” said Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn at a speech announcing the new strategy.
Most nations want to legally separate cybersecurity from traditional security concerns. So, if only America can convince other attendees to police the Internet with predator drones, they may actually agree to a global Internet treaty.
Print this page.
9 Responses to “Globalists Using London Cyberspace Summit to Push for Global Internet Treaty”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Posted in 
Tags: 
“Analysts explained the power struggle to be that Western states want to protect their networks from cyber attacks, while China and Russia seek security of information, which means controlling content.”
Western countries want to protect their networks from cyber attacks? How does this promote their censorship idea? Whether they have censorship or not, the West and any other country will always have cyber attacks in some form or another. Like saying, if people don’t say anything, then there won’t be any crime. Ridiculous!
The hypocrisy of the commie countries is typical. The biggest breachers of security come from those countries, so they accuse others of what they are most guilty of.
A global internet treaty will be rainbows and unicorns for all.
Globalists Using London Cyberspace Summit to Push for Global Internet Treaty
===================================================
LMAO! OK! Its huggles, glen, “mikesomething or another”, and all the English leftists at this site to say something now.
Lets see what they do about all this shit in their land. Betcha you assholes go there and shut it down…right? LOL!! Hey Glen..what was it you said last time?! LMAO!! Something about “all talk and no action”, right? OK, heres your big chance to do your “stuff”!
Hey! Hit them over their heads with your “pinwheels”! That’ll show em! LOL!!!
==================================
From the article; “The London summit is hosted by Foreign Secretary, William Hague, who said the purpose is to “discuss ideas and expected behaviour in cyberspace”.
—————————————————————–
Did you wimp pussies get that? LOL!
You better be real nice to me or they’ll “get you”!
You all can start by giving me better head. LOL!
Eat it up…girls!
Bravo2…….out
rjtabit Reply:
November 1st, 2011 at 2:36 pm
I’ve been browsing this site for about a year and the information that I’ve learned or confirmed truly is amazing. I grew up in a househould similar to the ones talked about
on this site. (Globalist,ect) My father was a a typical globalist, aspiring emperor type of person. Although my family didn’t make up the 1%, many of our family friends did. Anyway, back to the topic. I was under the impression that this site is for people who know or want to know the truth regarding the Anglo-American Corporate Empire(The 8th and final). The funny thing is, all I see on most of these comments is constant arguing and bickering over stupid things. Everyone of you pretends like you’re some kind of genius who knows everything. Instead of educating and informing each other about different areas that some know and others do not know, most of you people just insult and berate one another. This is hilarious in the fact that you people on Prison Planet and InfoWars call yourselves the resistance. Many of you have stated many times that the Global Elite have for centuries used the the time-old scheme of divide and conquer to control populations. This is it exactly. There is no discusssion on these boards. Most comments receive no response, and the comments that do receive a response are typically insults and belittlement. I’m not saying everybody should hold hands and sing “KumbaYah”. I understand many people here are extremely angry by their present economic conditions (debts, foreclosures, bankruptcies) brought about by these diabolical bastards in New York, Washington, and London. But you people had better start learning to get along with one another if you have any chance of forming a resistance and saving your liberties.
Finally to Reconcountsniper, I’ve read many of your comments and you seem to have a good grasp on he truth of World Affairs. I assume by your name that you spent time in the US Armed Forces??? The thing I’ve noticed is that when someone does not agree exactly with what you say, you reply with rude, macho-like comments. Do you think your military training or your gun supply is going to save you when things get bad??? You keep talking about taking heads and blowing things up but are you prepared for the consequences. Are you ready to die if it means taking a few of them with you?? This is not the military, yet you pretend like you are a soldier. The military is the ENEMY, THE ULTIMATE ENEMY AND CORPORATE BITCH!!! They serve their masters and commit murder so Lockheed Martin and the Rothschild Federal Reserve can get richer. In exchange for selling their soul to the Devil, US soldiers receive a lousy paycheck and are tossed aside like trash after their time. My first and last comment. Love the site and the articles, but these blogs are ridiculous.
Bravo2……out Hero
reconscoutsniper Reply:
November 1st, 2011 at 5:13 pm
After that blathering of bullshit on your part, do you really expect a reply? You answered yourself. So you deal with it.
Just who are you to question any one else, rjtabit? “Looking to find out” for yourself, or, are you just spitting out words to see where they land?
Why dont you come “take a look for yourself if you are that curious or interested? That will answer any and all questions regarding what Im prepared to do. Why leave it to question?
You said; “You keep talking about taking heads and blowing things up but are you prepared for the consequences”.
Copy the post right here, where I stated what you claim I ever wrote about ; “taking heads and blowing things up”.
Be sure to list the web page article where that post can be found by anyone and everyone to read.
You wrote, “My first and last comment. Love the site and the articles, but these blogs are ridiculous.
We dont need to question you regarding your “intestinal fortitude”. You just showed yourself for what you are. Isnt that right? Your new handle is “Old Yellow Stain”.
You “posted”, then you ran away. That shows the rest of us where you’ll be when TSHTF.
You wrote; “This is not the military”.
No shit? You need to study “The Art Of War”, by Sun Tzu. Certain Corporations require their personnel to read and study that book. There isnt a day that goes by where some form of confrontation is not present in our lives.
To win the battles and to win the war, everything should be seen through our eyes as a “military engagement”. You either win, or, you lose.
You wrote; “Everyone of you pretends like you’re some kind of genius who knows everything.
That shows you have NOT been reading the posts here. There are those here who answer that they do not know, when they dont know about a certain issue. Just this week, I was asked a question. The reply given by me stated to that effect.
Had you read it, you would have know that. You didnt, Hence, You are a liar.
“Russians dont take a dump without having a plan, son”. Hunt For Red October.
That is exactly correct. Look at your pathetic attempt at belittlement towards me.
You have been called on the carpet for your remarks. So, Whats your next move?
You dont have one, except to run and hide. According to you, you said; “My first and last comment”.
You fired, but, you missed. You had the wrong range dialed in. Your round fell “short” just like you did. You gave away your position and in turned were killed by overwhelming fire power. Its called, ABA, or, “air burst artillery”.
You left here, because, you have “NO PLAN”. So, good riddance. We certainly dont need another coward around here, we have plenty of them at PP. Should you, as a coward, decide to question some one else in the future, it would be to your advantage to try and “think” 5 moves in advance before you “cut and run”.
That way, you dont look as big a fool as do right now. Hows that, for being, “ridiculous”?
LOL!!!! By the way, if I have, ” a good grasp on he truth of World Affairs”, as you say, why would you try and take a shot at me? You have no answer. Never ask a question unless you know in advance what the correct answer is. “The” is spelled “the”, not “he”. Make the corrections.
Try and remember that next time. LMAO!!!!!!!!!
“Once spoiled by the allure of big money, there is no turning back”. Who said/wrote that? LOL!!! Go back to being the “spoiled rich kid”. Its all you can do. You have given me “amusement”, tonight. Be sure to pull the “silver spoon” from your ass before sitting down.
θάνατο πριν από ντροπή
Bravo2….out
SPREAD THE WORD! Work actively to UNSEAT any member of the House or Senate who supports or signs onto this Bill! We should also ACTIVELY BOYCOTT any company that donates to the supporters of this legislation. THEY CAN’T FORCE US TO CONSUME.
Just in time for 2012. No surprise there.
one big party with all the real terrorists
looks like some one will have to quit selling paint because the world is full of canvas