RSS Feed
December 6th, 2011 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda I applaud SOS News and Mal Davies for standing up against this billion dollar RSPCA Charity scam.
RSPCA kill animals needlessly daily. RSPCA do not spend a dime on animals, all supplies are donated to them daily by suppliers. So there is no excuse to kill any animal.
RSPCA will never share their surplus donations of food. clothing, medical supplies to other animals shelters in desperate need that do a real job of keeping animals alive.. instead, RSPCA toss all their surplus supplies in the garbage bin weekly.
This information comes from ex RSPCA staff.
RSPCA scams the Government of grants annually worth millions… as well as the public for donations and little old ladies retirement funds.
All your donations go to RSPCA’s 6 figure salaries and property investments… never to animals!
RSPCA uses fraudulent media ads to make us give.. in reality RSPCA do very little to help animals in return.
All those animals seized by RSPCA eventually get killed. So what help is RSPCA in rescuing animals?
Insulting RSPCA has proved very expensive for the online newsletter editor who has been ordered by authorities to pay $100,000 as defamation damages to the RSPCA.
The editor of SOS News, Mr. Mal Davies published an article on March 19 this year, claiming that RSPCA is cruel and has needlessly destroyed animals. Following wrong statements in the article, Mr. Davies was sued by the group, resulting which the NSW Supreme Court Justice Megan Latham today ordered Mal Davies to pay damages at earliest.
Mr. Davies showed no regard to the proceedings and was absent in all of them. The RSPCA sued him on the charges for writing six false defamatory meanings in the entire article against it.
The article basically referred to a 78-year-old farmer Ruth Downey who was deniedspecial leave to motivate any High Court challenge in relation to animal cruelty charges. The Editor further added some defamatory meanings, stating that the RSPCA, NSW, is a cruel organization because it executed healthy cows without any reason and moreover, it also killed Ms. Downey’s cows in an inhumane manner.
Hearing the claims, the judge said that levied claims against the RSPCA of cruelly killing animals for significant financial benefits of its directors can lower the organization’s reputation. Thus, the justice ordered $100,000 as damage fees for the Editor to further restrict him from publishing any such kind of matter.
We all are familiar with the fact that the RSPCA is a not-for-profit organization, thus claiming such indecent remarks against the organization is a big offense.
“The whole style of the article encourages an emotional rather than an analytical response in its readers, while purporting to provide a factual account of an issue of public interest”, the judge said.
http://topnews.net.nz/content/220405-editor-fined-100000-indecent-remarks-rspca
Posted in 
Tags: 
