Jew World Order

They used to call it “cultural imperialism.” Now they call it
tolerance. The Barack Obama administration has spent $700 million since
2012 promoting the homosexuality agenda overseas – with more than half
of that sum being spent in sub-Saharan Africa – and has nothing to show
for it except more anti-homosexuality laws and ill will. Ah, tax money
at work. ~ Selwyn Duke

Writes the New York Times:

Suspicious neighbors and landlords pry into their private lives.
Blackmailers hunt for victims on the social media sites they use to meet
others of the same sex. Police officers routinely stop them to search
for incriminating images and chats on their cellphones.

Since an anti-gay law went into effect last year, many gay Nigerians
say they have been subjected to new levels of harassment, even violence.

They blame the law, the authorities and broad social intolerance for
their troubles. But they also blame an unwavering supporter whose
commitment to their cause has been unquestioned and conspicuous across
Africa: the United States government.

“The U.S. support is making matters worse,” said Mike, 24, a
university student studying biology in Minna, a town in central Nigeria
who asked that his full name not be used for his safety. “There’s more
resistance now. It’s triggered people’s defense mechanism.”

… In Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, the final passage of the
2014 law against homosexuality – which makes same-sex relationships
punishable by 14 years in prison.

It is a crime to organize or
participate in any type of gay meeting – is widely regarded by both
supporters and opponents of gay rights as a reaction to American
pressure on Nigeria and other African nations to embrace gay rights.

One African activist describes this as “blowback.” And Obama’s effort
has been very aggressive, with the administration making the
homosexuality agenda “an integral part of American foreign policy,” as
the Times puts it, and tying development aid to acceptance of it.

For example, after Uganda enacted its tough 2014 anti-homosexuality
law, Obama punished the nation by cutting or redirecting certain
development funds. Yet homosexual behavior remains illegal in most
African countries. Moreover, Russia also has also responded to Western
efforts – by deciding in 2013 to ban pro-homosexuality propaganda.

The irony of this won’t be lost on students of history. In the days
of the Soviet Union, the Marxists would seek to undermine target nations
(e.g., the United States) via a process of “demoralization.”

Part
of this was, as Florida Democrat Representative A. S. Herlong, Jr. read
into the congressional record in 1963, to “Present homosexuality,
degeneracy and promiscuity as ‘normal, natural, healthy'” (taken from
ex-F.B.I. agent Cleon Skousen’s book The Naked Communist). Yet now the United States advances this goal while Russia resists it.

Of course, Obama’s homosexuality scheme isn’t without American critics. FrontPage Mag’s Daniel Greenfield wrote,
wryly, that “apparently sub-Saharan Africa is in desperate need of Gay
Pride Day.

Somehow, Obama managed to blow through $350 million on
gay rights groups in sub-Saharan Africa in two years. I don’t even
understand how he managed that.” Yet it’s no mystery.

It’s man’s nature
to be even more willing to accept other people’s money than statists are
to be generous with other people’s money. And much, if not most, of it
likely disappeared into the pockets of corrupt African officials.

From wry to downright sarcastic brings us to American Thinker’s Ed Straker. He presented some discussion questions:

1) We have an enormous national debt of nearly 19 trillion dollars,
such that it seems excessive to spend 700 million dollars on this
subject. With such tremendous debt, do you think we can really justify
spending more than 300 or 400 million dollars to promote gay sex in
other countries?

2) Do you think this program was flawed to begin with, because there
were no metrics taken – e.g., comparing the number of gay sex acts
before and after the program began to measure its success?

3) Do you think there should be a greater focus on gay sex in Islamic countries?

Speaking of which, Nigeria, the focus of the Times piece, is
bedeviled by a jihadist group – Islamic State in West Africa (ISWA) –
that seeks to make it a completely Islamic country.

Previously (and
still more commonly) known as Boko Haram and labeled the “world’s deadliest terror group” by The New American, the jihadists now have formal ties to Da’esh (ISIS) and commit unspeakable atrocities.

Yet the Obama administration not only prioritizes fighting for
homosexuality over fighting against ISWA, but is also accused of refusing to help defeat the group until Nigeria accepts the homosexuality agenda.

The irony of this won’t be lost on students of current events.
Hillary Clinton recently claimed that Donald Trump’s anti-jihadist
rhetoric is being used by Da’esh in promotional videos. While her claim
has been proven false, a different American political figure does make an appearance in the group’s propaganda.

In the slickly made video found here,
Da’esh encourages Western Muslims not to do the bidding of, among other
sinners, “fornicators” – as it shows Bill Clinton’s picture.

This illustrates not just the Clintons’ hypocrisy and destructiveness
to America’s image, but an even larger issue. Jihadists don’t hate our
legitimate “liberty” but our licentiousness; they consider us ripe for
the taking not because of a dearth of tolerance but our descent into
turpitude.

They’ve called us and would cast us as “the great Satan” –
and our Great Sexual Heresy plays right into their hands.

As an example, consider author Justin Raimondo’s observation
after the Supreme Court’s faux-marriage ruling in June: “The effect on
our eternal ‘war on terrorism’ may be bigger than anyone now realizes.

Obergefell v. Hodges
hands ISIS a propaganda victory on a silver platter: they can now point
to the ‘decadent’ West and raise the specter of America’s gay hordes descending on the Middle East to sodomize the pious into submission.”

Note that Da’esh marked
the court’s marriage ruling by throwing four homosexual men off a
high-rise building’s roof, an incident reported by a Syrian Twitter user
on the pro-faux-marriage hashtag #LoveWins.

While jihadist groups may demonize any non-Muslim leader, Trumpian
tough talk will never earn the disdain engendered by Clintonian
corruption. Just consider, for instance, that the name Boko Haram
translates into “Western education is a sin.”

What about modern
Western education, do you suppose, most inspires pious Muslims to rally
to the jihadist cause?

Source

December 29, 2015 – KnowTheLies

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook