One Million Viewers See Bob McIlvaine, Building 7 on France 3

RememberBuilding7.org
September 12, 2011

Remember Building 7 continues to educate millions of people on both sides of the Atlantic. France’s second largest public channel did the campaign justice in one of the most unbiased pieces ever done by a mainstream news outlet.

If you want this kind of news coverage to multiply, please join thousands of others in making a donation on the 10th Anniversary.






 
Print this page.

Comment Rules


4 Responses to “One Million Viewers See Bob McIlvaine, Building 7 on France 3”

  1. Jerry I am with Massudo.

    Dimitri Khalezov’s explanation is compelling. He explains that a 150 kiloton bomb planted x metres underground can only reach up a building of about 80 stories. Everything under that height and directly under the point of explosion is pulverized completely.

    Years later a blob of melted steel is found under the towers which was supposedly recognized as being part of the ice age. Also be aware of the thousands of responders who are suffering from leukaemia. Another coincidence is that the Europeans are receiving contaminated steel from China and India. Those countries received the scrap-metal that was whisked away days after 9/11.

  2. Did anybody tell him that Dimitri Khalezov already solved 95% of all 911 mysteries? Thank you Dimitri Khalezov! You r a true 911 hero!

    • Massudo-
      You managed to get me on the same side as the self titled truthers…..Not an easy task.

      Your severely retarded rants about nuclear weapons being used in the WTC are sad..

      I hope when Obamas free health care thing takes affect that you will get that much needed mental health assistance that has been screaming for help since you started posting laser beam theories….

      God Bless you Massudo…..Like a small retarded dog, its not your fault…..

      Its not your fault….

      Its not your fault……….

      NO MASSUDO………….Its not your fault

      Its not your fault…..

    • I honest didn’t think I would ever agree with RECONDO on anything but in this continuous postings of yours regarding Dimitri Khalezov and his claim of nuclear detonations under each of the three main buildings at the WTC (WTC-1,2,7) I am finding his claim somewhat troubling. It sure does look like a nuclear bomb went off around there, not questioning that, but when it comes to others and what it is they had to say I find his claims without merit.

      For example: He completely discounts other on the scene eye and ear witness testimony regarding multiple explosions. I am reminded of William Rodriguez who claims to have both felt and heard a tremendous explosion BEFORE the alleged airplane struck the first tower. And the same can be said for hundreds of fire and rescue workers who survived to tell their stories of explosions while they were inside the towers. And then there is Barry Jennings (RIP) who told us of his multiple hour long ordeal where there was explosions in Building 7 until such time as he was removed by rescue workers and then hours later the building collapsed // which certainly doesn’t agree with the nuclear detonation theory set forth by Mr. Khalezaov now does it.

      Besides there is the matter of what I consider a disconnect when it comes to how WTC7 disappears smoothly to the ground which he states having been entirely affected by the blast wave and the building having turned to dust settles into the nuclear furnace below; when it comes to the much larger towers and the shock wave not able to transit to the entire top of the building, he claims we see the building’s solid top smashing the hell out of the affected lower sections BUT I BELIEVE he failed to explain why the towers just stood their ground while the smashing occured without it too (both of them, neither of them) having also smoothly slid into the alleged nuclear furnace below them. WTF? Can’t have it both ways, right.

      Now his claim for a missile having struck the Pentagon…well, maybe that. But I find I am inclined more so to believe a combination of shaped charges (targeting specific offices inside) followed up by a smaller un-manned aircraft having struck the reinforced west wall. There is no way I know for sure, saying this based upon observations of others on the scene // which Mr. Dimitri Khalezov was not.

      You know there is such a thing as the truth movement being diverted away from its goal to get at the truths of 9/11 by injection of what may appear possible but sadly such subjects come without merit. Now why those deadend proposals exist may have many possibilities, one terribly upsetting one is to send the movement down a dead end street where it will go nowhere but spin in circles. I am inclined to trust proven scientific research and not so much a former Russian military officer who claims he has the keys to the secrets of 9/11. No offense intended, he might be serious but might also be wrong. And he might also be a psyops agent. Something you should seriously consider in view of the mountain of building evidence which complicates his proposals.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes