RSS Feed
December 3rd, 2017 
Awake Goy By Russ Winter
In April, Procter and Gamble announced some details of its $12 billion or so cost-cutting binge over five years. This includes slashing $2 billion in advertising expenditures. Specifically P&G is moving away from ads on Facebook that micro-target specific consumers. P&G found that this micro-targeting of specific consumers based on the data Facebook has collected on them reduced reach and wasn’t working.
CFO Jon Moeller explained the gist of it- the Internet is crawling with with fradulent bots.
In the fourth quarter, the reduction in marketing that occurred was almost all in the digital space. And what it reflected was a choice to cut spending from a digital standpoint where it was ineffective: where either we were serving bots as opposed to human beings, or where the placement of ads was not facilitating the equity of our brands.”
So P&G cut over $100 million out of its digital advertising spend in the fourth quarter, and this is what happened, according to Moeller: “We didn’t see a reduction in the growth rate.”
He touched on the two most common complaints about digital advertising scams:
- Advertisers are paying for ads that are viewed and clicked on by bots, not humans.
- Ads are placed by thousands of automated “ad exchanges” that are out of control of the advertiser on sites and pages that don’t match the advertiser’s products.
The entire vast space between legitimate advertisers and legitimate publishers is populated by a murky slimy world of often invisible entities, usually automated, that try to extract their cut and in the process further dilute the effectiveness of advertising expenses.
In the realm of social media, a Digital Forensic Lab’s study using a behavior-based model, estimated that 9 percent to 15 percent of active Twitter accounts were bots (a lot more than Twitter has reported).
Incredibly the notion of buying Twitter, Instagram and Facebook followers and likes is considered acceptable. The trick is to fool the cognescenti into believing the site is popular. The public perception of popularity is as good as gold in our inverted world.
This type of fake activity can be found in social media forums such as Reddit, At times discussion there is owned by bots. Additionally power resides in individual subreddits. In the most popular ones there was a power grab to become moderators of these subreddits. In terms of how this works TNN is not permitted to post in r/news and many other “mainstream” subreddits. In others we are frequently met with bot attacks. Still others where our articles are welcome have been banned.
In particular was the heavy presence of discourse disrupting paid bot activity during the pizzagate aka pedogate discussion last year before those subreddits were banned by Reddit. For example, TNN shared this article at Reddit which drew a prima facie and rather comical example of a bot trying to disrupt the conversation on Pizzagate (aka Pedogate). “Clovize” is TNN and, of course, “Jpop” is the non-human bot. Jpop made the first comment within minutes of the post.
Who funds this kind of operation?
Naturally, the Reddit moderators take all this down after five hours, but here is what transpired.
jpop23mn 0 points an hour ago
oh, c’mon! This is clearly the fake news that makes us lol bad
clovize[S] 2 points an hour ago
Given your garbled syntax, I have a capcha to determine if you are a human or a bot. Answer this question: are dominos played on cheese or pasta?
jpop23mn [score hidden] 59 minutes ago
I’m still not convinced
[–]lemonyfresh3667 [score hidden] 57 minutes ago
A bot lol, gives the same comment to every pizzag8 post
jpop23mn via /r/conspiracy sent 9 minutes ago
bot? Shill? That’s original
[–]clovize[S] 1 point 4 minutes ago
Wow, first hand glimpse of a non-human bot in action.
TNN learns a little more about jpop23mn:
Here are even more stark examples of organized and fraudulent bot-wave operations on the Pizzagate/Pedogate issue. The messages are identical for the multiple bots. Notice that a number of the bot avatars also show up in the second canned message.
Definition of fraud: Act or course of deception, an intentional concealment, omission or perversion of truth.
This article originally appeared on The New Nationalist and was republished here with permission.
Source Article from http://www.renegadetribune.com/social-media-fluff-problem-internet-bots/
Posted in 
Tags: 
