RSS Feed
October 30th, 2015 
Awake Goy
October 29, 2015
Comments for “Talmud Cited By Defence at Topham Hate Crime Trial”
Robert K said (October 30, 2015):
You can see why the MSM are not covering this important trial. But you may be sure they will be crowing loudly if Topham is convicted. It would be the obverse of the recent case in the UK, where the trial of Ben Fellowes, who reported that a Minister of the Crown had sexually assaulted him in his youth, was reported on until the jury exonerated Fellowes, at which point the Establishment media abruptly fell silent.
The external discipline of the media is now so blatantly pervasive that it is surprising that anyone pays attention to it at all, except perhaps as an exercise in studying methods of deception. It has become just a section in the orchestra playing to manipulate and neutralize the thinking of the population.
It’s probably too much to hope that the judge might utter some obiter dicta about the laughable research standards of the hate speech squad, which clearly is beyond its depth in a matter such as this.
MS said (October 30, 2015):
The second and longest chapter in the Quran, al-Baqarah (“The Cow” – referring to the golden calf,) is among other things an epic overview of the Jews and their eventual betrayal of God’s covenant. In it, God tells us that the exiled Jews in Babylon learned sorcery from two angels, Haroot and Maroot, who were sent to the Jews as a test. We learn that “they began following the book which was rehearsed to them by the devils (Talmud),” and that “they threw their revealed book (Torah) behind their backs.”
The Quran further exonerates Prophet Solomon, blessings be upon him, from allegations of sorcery, and affirms his role in uprooting the occultist Jewish leadership and the Jinn (demons) with whom they were in league.
This site has a pretty good summary:
Paul said (October 30, 2015):
One of the hardest things about being God’s Chosen People (something I do believe the Jews are at the moment) is learning how to accept such an identity with humility and realize that as a leader of the groups of people that make up our world, this one group of people has to always be above reproach. If they sin in any way, they will be judged by God Himself, in more severe ways than any other group of people. This identity is not for the weak or the timid but for the boldest and bravest of men. The Talmud twists this identity into a monstrosity.
—
Paul
The notion that God would choose one people over another is a con job and perversion of the meaning of God, which in part is universal love.
henry
Bob said (October 30, 2015):
I’d love to have a transcript of this trial!
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Source Article from http://henrymakow.com/2015/10/talmud-raised-at-thought-crime.html
Posted in 
Tags: 
Al Thompson said (October 30, 2015):
I read this and it is going to be hard grind doing the trial this way. His attorney is going to the merits of the case without challenging jurisdiction. That is done by asking the simple question: “What facts do you have that the ‘hate crime’ codes apply to me?” This immediately goes to discredit the prosecution’s witness. If they try to answer it, then ask: “Is that a fact or an opinion?” They will never provide any facts that the codes apply to anyone. I had a govtard state: “The codes apply because the codes apply.” Usually, the judge will ignore this and continue with the case, at which point the defendant should object to every answer the witness gives. This will make any witness look like they are not competent as a witness and their testimony should be disregarded. The problem with quoting the Talmud is that his attorney has already accepted the “court’s” jurisdiction and he is getting to the merits of the case without establishing the court’s authority. Of course, you would expect an attorney to do that as they wouldn’t have a job.
I think this works because no man’s law can interfere with the natural law that God created. Since the court is Satanic, there is really no remedy. And that’s why the court’s authority should always be challenged. An attorney won’t do that, unfortunately. While Arthur may do okay with the jury by showing the hypocrisy of the Jews and the Talmud, the main problem is that his attorney accepted jurisdiction without a challenge.
There’s a lot more that can be done in a courtroom, but jurisdiction is the big issue and should be established before the trial. I hope this works out well for him, but it is up to his attorney to shift the burden of proof and make them prove everything they are accusing Arthur of doing. Most attorneys do not do a good job with this. Applicability of the codes should be the first place to start.
The big question if one is caught in a courtroom should be directed to the judge at arraignment: “What facts do you have that the codes apply to me?”
In my opinion, the only authority that means anything is God’s authority under his natural law. The rest of it is just nonsense and it is unusable.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-god-defense.html