The global era and the end of foreign policy

Philip Zelikow
Financial Times
August 18, 2011

In the past foreign policy mainly consisted of adjusting relations between states – what they will do with or to each other. Now foreign policy mainly consists of adjusting the domestic policies of different states – of what they will do with or to their own people.

It is a simple argument, but if fully understood its ramifications are significant. It is commonplace to read that America is going through a period of retrenchment, with a focus on domestic policy. But the same could be said of other major powers, including China, India, Japan, and all of Europe. Yet today foreign policy need not recede. Instead, foreign policies should focus on how to harmonise “domestic” policies.

Domestic, of course, is often just the national face of an essentially global system. Moves to save global capitalism, for instance, change nominally domestic matters, like bank capital adequacy or fiscal policy. But take the point further: the most pressing concerns of global firms, beyond formal trade rules, are issues like government procurement, competition policy, product safety rules and intellectual property law.

Read full article






 
Print this page.

Comment Rules


One Response to “The global era and the end of foreign policy”

  1. Philip Zelikow loves to floss his teeth w/ Rudolf Guliani’s asshairs.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes