Annie Robbins: “you thinking you’re right, accusing someone (anyone) who doesn’t agree of being a zionist …. etc. etc.
Philip acts as if he is against Israel’s occupation and against the treatment of Palestinians, which he would presumably, like all of us here, like to end. Yet, he helps to continue providing the Zionists with the only cover they have, as it were, by conflating Zionism and Judaism, which are 2 different concepts, and by insisting on talking about liberal Zionists, which is like talking about liberal racists.
Zionism is a racist ideology and pairing it somehow with religion is fundamentally wrong. You may not agree, but it is not something I invented myself, that is what Zionism is about: a “home” for the Jewish people only, run by & for the sole benefit of Jews, i.e. racism.
Philip does not see this dichotomy in his thinking, which is why I am trying to get him to explain it. I am a strong believer in calling a spade a spade, esp. where Israel/Palestinians are concerned. Philip has a different mindset, which is why I take him to task on that (sorry if I hurt your tender feelings using that expression). As a publisher of his journalistic work in combination with his thoughts he should expect to get critical comments, otherwise he would be in the wrong business.
“like who cares? how do you take anyone to task here, by making an ignorant authoritative presumptuous comment?”
I could not give 2 hoots whether you care or not, I do not comment here to score brownie points or get upvotes or virtual pats on the back. I comment here about what my feelings are about the articles I read here, and whether you or anyone else here is interested or not is your business.
“i’m just not understanding how whatever you’re saying holds any kind of threat at all.”
The reason you don’t understand it is because your interpretation of my arguments is a non-sequitur. You misread my argumentation.
So, just for the record, I did not threaten Phil with anything, I was just upfront from my side by stating that I will keep addressing the issue because I feel very strongly about it, and I have not seen any arguments, least of all from you, demonstrating that I am talking nonsense.
And, no, I do not think that people who don’t agree with (such as you) are lying. But if I see 2 patently contradictory “opinions”, I will take issue with it.
If my comments are ignorant, authoritative, or presumptuous, then present your counter-arguments, show me in which way they are so. If, as I suspect, you are not interested in that, fine, but then there is no need to put out unreasoned, slanderous comments against me. Remember, you are just another commenter here like me, no more no less, and I am not interested in mudslinging.
BTW, if I could not stand Phil’s way I would not continue reading his articles & commenting; commenting for me is a sign of involvement, even if those comments are not to everyone’s liking.
RSS Feed
March 20th, 2018 
Awake Goy 
Posted in 
Tags: 
