“Filthy White Savages” Having Dogs As Pets Now Considered To Be Racist

The author of an article on the non-profit United Wildlife Union site, who goes by the handle Cayde-6, thinks that Whites having dogs as pets should be considered racist. The site states that “United Wildlife Union is a non-profit and volunteer based group that aims to share and create content that furthers our two primary goals – protect animal lives and further social justice.”

Looking at this site I wonder if the author (not sure if that’s a real name and photo shows what appears to be a White man) may be the only member of this organization, since there are few articles and they are all written by Cayde-6.

The short author bio states: “Cayde [Katy?] is a father to two and a lifelong conservationist. When not committing time to the local zoo, Cayde spends his time creating and disseminating educational materials for local schools that help kids understand why protecting animals and LGBTQIA+ rights is so important.” Is it just me or is one of these things not like the other? It’s obvious the alphabet/SJW groups (backed by our “tribal buddies”) will use any forum to pass on their sick anti-family, anti-White doctrine to children.

Here are some quotes from the Cayde-6 article “Why White People Owning Dogs is Racist.”

According to bio-archaeologist Gregor Larson, [It’s Greger] the domestication of dogs started in 2 places: Eastern and Western Eurasia. The Eurasian people worked non stop to gain and maintain the trust with these gorgeous creatures, but it was all stolen from them. The greedy actions by white people stained the history books forever. Shortly after the Eurasian people worked so hard to train and bond with wolves, most of them were shipped off and given to Europeans. These filthy white savages took the work and credit from the Eurasian people and branded these magnificent creatures as their own. The need for white people to claim premade or pre-discovered things is not isolated to just this incident. Countless times in history, whites have been caught stealing the work and talent of POC for their own success. Honestly speaking, we shouldn’t be surprised that white people would steal the domestication of dogs as well. Based on historical knowledge, this behavior will not slow down within the white community.

If you are white and own a dog, you are openly participating and advocating for cultural appropriation and colonialism. Reinforcing this culture is NOT acceptable and will come with its repercussions. Dogs are and always will be the living reminder of how tainted our history is as a whole. POC deserve to exclusively own dogs as a form of restitution for their stolen ancestor’s work. Supporting the idea of white dog ownership is spitting on the grave of past POC generations. With International Dog Day coming up, it is important we remember and advocate for the work of POC, and never let this unbalanced history be forgotten. If you are white and own a canine, please consider donating them to a local POC family or non kill shelter so it can truly find the perfect home.

On the organization’s Twitter page you can find the following:

And this is the organization’s thoughts about Seahorses:

I followed the link to the Dr. Greger Larson site that Cayde-6 provides as proof for his beliefs. Honestly I can’t see how Cayde-6 came to his conclusions from this scientist’s research. Here is a quote from the site:

Dogs remain an enigma, however, not only because they were the first domestic animal and the only domesticate whose appearance precedes the emergence of settled agriculture, but also because decades of archaeological and genetic research have failed to reveal where and how many times dogs were domesticated. Establishing the origins of dogs is critical given their standing as the first domesticate. Because neither traditional zooarchaeological nor modern genetic approaches have been able to resolve where and how many times dogs were domesticated, we will combine ancient DNA (aDNA) and geometric morphometric (GM) techniques to archaeological canid remains.

In fact Dr. Greger Larson is linked to a site promoting a documentary called “Made for Each Other” that doesn’t appear to be telling White people to give up keeping dogs as pets, quite the contrary.

In researching the loony ideas espoused by the United Wildlife Union I wondered if this is just a one-off. But no, this actually seems to be a thing among the usual suspects.

There is this article from PJ Media titled “Liberal’s Tweet Goes Viral: ‘White People Love Dogs Because They Miss Owning Slaves’.”

“Liberal Twitter-user Danielle (@ladypalerider) has a different explanation for people’s love for dogs, however. Wait. I should’ve written: for white people’s love for our canine comrades. According to her, “white people love dogs so much because deep down they miss owning slaves. They love the owner and master dynamic, desperate for something to control.””

“Silly me, here I was thinking that slave owners generally treated their slaves very badly indeed. But, according to Miss Liberal, slave owners cuddled their slaves, took them for regular walks, groomed them, hugged them regularly, showered them with love, bought them all kinds of gifts, and even made sure that when they went on holiday, their slaves would be treated well. After all, that is how we dog-owners treat our dogs.

Calling Danielle’s tweet “ridiculous” would be the understatement of the century.

It goes without saying that many Twitter users (rightfully) took offense to Danielle’s tweet. “What about cats, gerbils, birds, snakes, horses, ducks…” @MadonnaMadsen asks, after which she says she gives Danielle “the STUPIDEST TWEET award.””

It doesn’t stop there. Here are some quotes from Jamilah King [ a black racist] in a Mother Jones article titled “Let’s Make Dog Parks Less Racist: We’re talking to you, Dog Park Debbie.”

One critical lesson, though, didn’t come from Anthony [a dog trainer]. It came from a complete stranger who reminded me why I hate most dog parks: They’re so unbearably, unapologetically white.

In the middle of Anthony helping me put a finer touch on one of my commands, a woman approached. You know the type. Maybe you are the type. She was a white woman who’d come to the park that morning, toting her dog and lots of good intentions. Let’s call her Dog Park Debbie.

Even though Anthony, who is white, stood by my side, Dog Park Debbie directed her attention toward me. What I was doing, she said, was all wrong. She demonstrated her preferred way to do all the things. She spoke softly and slowly, as if I might have trouble understanding. And then, the final insult: Did my dog have a coat? I should really get her a coat. It’s Brooklyn and it’s cold. [Since you are what the jews refer to as a schwarze living in Brooklyn, are you sure your (Torah Deborah) was White and not a jenta? Just wondering].

After what felt like way too long, Anthony and I politely walked away from the woman, him fuming at someone so fearlessly questioning his expertise. But I couldn’t get past the coat. Does my dog have a coat? Why, yes. In fact, she has several. She has seasonal attire. It matches. Accentuates her eyes. She has looks—lewks!—that I replenish often, and as a thirysomething divorced lesbian [I’m so surprised] who spends about 90 percent of my disposable income on my dog, I am not ashamed. In fact, I come from a family that has long loved and doted on any number of pets, including cats, dogs, guinea pigs, hamsters, and once, oddly, a monkey. We love our littles. And we’re not new to this.

We’re also, unfortunately, not new to Dog Park Debbies. I had largely pushed them from my mind, but they are common. Sometimes they’re loud and vocal. Sometimes they’re quiet and suspicious, side-eyeing you when your dog shows the slightest growl. They have Lots of Opinions about what you’re doing wrong. Or sometimes they have no opinions whatsoever, and try very hard to not be around you and your dog at all. They make the meaningless and surprisingly refreshing dog park banter—What’s your dog’s name? How old? Is she nice?—suddenly charged [That banter is so frightening].

As I left the dog park that day, I looked around to see if there were any other Black people there with dogs. There was one. We nodded, that silent acknowledgement Black people give one another that says, I see yougood morning, or, more often, Do you believe this shit? Informally, I started asking friends of mine with dogs if they went to dog parks. Two were Black, one was Puerto Rican. Every single person said they just didn’t feel comfortable. It was always too white.

I’m sure Jamilah would be very happy if Whites were barred from acquiring dogs as pets. The attacks against Whites is unrelenting and continues to get weirder in this jew run clown world.

Hits: 439

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to ““Filthy White Savages” Having Dogs As Pets Now Considered To Be Racist”

Leave a Reply


The maximum upload file size: 28 MB.
You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, other.
Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded.

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes