Jew World Order

In 2004, emeritus professor of physics at California State University
and American representative to the UN, Roger Dittmann, stated that all
policies related to Agenda 21 should be pursued with the aim of
worldwide population reduction and population control. “The Big Die
Off,” the professor eagerly added, “has already begun.” ~ Jurriaan Maessen – Video

In his presentation Sustainable Development, the New International Scientific Order, and UN Reform he gives his own definition of the term “sustainable development:”

“Economic (and other)
development that leads to reduction in population toward an optimum
level for maximization of the quality of life, i.e. environmentally
benign development that reduces the birth rate,” Dittmann explains on page 14 of his lecture notes.

Furthermore, the emeritus professor writes bluntly that (capitals by Dittmann) “The Big Die Off has already begun (page 17).”

In order to facilitate such a massive “die-off,” the professor
proposes (page 18) global governance to make sure the directives will be
universally applied:

“Since this is a global effort, it requires global organization, both governmental and popular,” he writes.

Dittmann’s specific remark concerning this “big die off” echoes Paul Ehrlich’s remark just a few days ago in response to the elitist UK-based Royal Society report People and the Planet.

After the Royal Society report was published (listing among its “key recommendations” several measures to drastically reduce population) Ehrlich said:

“The question is: can you go over
the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war
between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going
to be various forms of disaster.

Some maybe slow motion disasters like
people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because
the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus
transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast
die-off.”

Veiled threats from the most
vicious of eugenicists the world has ever known. I don’t have to remind
readers that all this talk of death and mass-death is becoming more
common every day.

Only recently I highlighted the case of University College’s Emeritus Professor John Guillebaud,
patron of the UK-based “Population Matters”, who depicted among other
things a machine-gun, a hospital bed, and a knife dripping with blood,
as examples of “natural” population control as opposed to “artificial”
methods such as contraception and family planning.

YouTubeLink

Back to Dittmann’s 2004 presentation. In his notes he also calls for a
new “International Scientific Order” to make sure the entire scientific
community is armed and ready to implement worldwide population
reduction. Dittmann:

“Not only do people require
organization about their (multiple) identities (including professional,
scholarly, and scientific), they need international, even supranational
affiliation, facing a common adversary.”

This common adversary-remark is completely in the spirit of the Club of Rome’s 1993 The First Global Revolution in which the authors state:

“In searching for a new enemy to
unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global
warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All
these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy
then, is humanity itself.”

To illustrate that in the case of professor Roger Dittmann we are not dealing with some isolated mad scientist in a cellar-lab, his own resume will suffice:

“He served on the Executive
Board of the World Federation of Scientific Workers (WFSW), in which he
has been active since 1967, and has represented the WFSW at the United
Nations.

He presides over the U.S. affiliate of the WFSW, the U.S.
Federation of Scholars and Scientists, founded in 1937 as the American
Association of Scientific Workers, which is also affiliated with the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

He has also
served as Chair of the Southern California Federation of Scientists, on
the National Council of the Federation of American Scientists, as well
as on the Executive Board of the Pacific Division of the AAAS.

He has
extensive international contacts and experience, including working with
UNESCO.”

Ah, UNESCO, always UNESCO. For
those who think that the entire population reduction-mantra is somehow
the end result of rigorous scientific thinking, the calculated,
incremental and synchronized move toward a brave new world should inform
them about its true origins.

It is not a bottom-up thing, somehow
evolving naturally from the grass roots; it is a top-down scientific
dictatorship rather, posing as grass roots, but carefully crafted to
brainwash as large an audience as it can through the use of mass media,
schooling systems and other available instruments of propaganda.

In
1974, the Director-General of UNESCO, Rene Maheu, stressed the
importance of gathering all media, irrespective of its medium, under the
great wing of UNESCO and the globalists.

At a banquet
of the International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere
Programme in Williamsburg, USA, Maheu starts out by giving some insight
in UNESCO’s long-term vision for mankind (page 2):

“The rationale behind the MAB (Man and the Biosphere) programme
is to ensure that the physical, biological and other environmental
requirements of man are placed in the hands of each of us (present) and
remain under our overall control.”

Explaining to his listening audience that the earth will disintegrate if not for “a collective effort planned, organized and executed by the international community acting in concert,” the Director-General goes on to state:

“I believe that we have now
reached the point in world affairs where we must have a systematic
reorganization of international relations on all levels.” He of course favors the UN as the proper body to do the reorganizing, gives it its proper name (page 4):

“I wish to reiterate my firm
conviction- together with my hope- that a new world order- political,
monetary, economic and social- should now be established.”

UNESCO’s founder, Vice President
of the Eugenics Society and foremost transhumanist Julian Huxley,
explained why global governance is crucial in his UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:

“Even though it is quite true
that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and
psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that
the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the
public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is
unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

 

Jurriaan Maessen – April 30, 2012 – InfoWars

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook