Bloomberg: First Amendment Doesn’t Apply To Wall St Protesters’ Tents

Mayor’s latest threat to occupy protesters

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
October 18, 2011

Bloomberg

After failing to remove occupy Wall Street protesters last week in order to close Zuccotti Park and “carry out cleaning”, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has issued another thinly veiled warning to those still present and protesting.

During a Press conference last night, Bloomberg asserted that “the Constitution doesn’t protect tents — it protects speech and assembly.”

“I’m 100 percent in favor of protecting — 1,000 percent in favor — of giving people rights to say things,” Bloomberg told those in attendance.

“…but also we have to protect those who don’t want to say anything,” he added.

“There are places where I think it’s appropriate to express yourself and then there are other places that are appropriate to set up a tent city, and they don’t necessarily have to be one and the same.” The mayor told reporters.

Earlier in the month, Bloomberg told the Wall Street Journal that protests would be allowed to continue indefinitely as long as participants obeyed the law.

“The bottom line is – people want to express themselves. And as long as they obey the laws, we’ll allow them to,” he said. “If they break the laws, then, we’re going to do what we’re supposed to do: enforce the laws.”

Despite this, Bloomberg has criticized the protesters, accusing them of “trying to destroy the jobs of working people.”

“Everyone’s got a thing they want to protest, some of which is not realistic.” Bloomberg said on his weekly radio address.

“And if you focus for example on driving the banks out of New York City, you know those are our jobs … You can’t have it both ways: If you want jobs you got to assist companies and give them confidence to go and hire people.”

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

“The protests that are trying to destroy the jobs of working people is unproductive,” he said.

“We are trying to deal with this is a way that doesn’t make the problem grow and protects everybody’s rights… we’re trying to let this — not ‘play out,’ that isn’t quite the right word, but let them express themselves.” Bloomberg added.

When asked by protesters if they could have a sound permit to use amplified devices in and around Zucotti Park, he dismissed the notion out of hand:

In a radio interview earlier this week, Bloomberg said that it was pressure from “many elected officials” that prevented Brookfield Properties from removing Occupy Wall Street protesters to clean Zuccotti Park:

According to a Quinnipiac Poll released yesterday, two out of every three New Yorkers support the protests. Even higher numbers, 72 percent to 24 percent, said law-abiding demonstrators should be able to remain in the area as long as they want.

——————————————————————

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.






 
Print this page.

Comment Rules


42 Responses to “Bloomberg: First Amendment Doesn’t Apply To Wall St Protesters’ Tents”

  1. Pretend all they want, hold this farce for as long as they please, Americans know civil uprising began with the sealed Patriot Act’s expropriation of the phone lines, power lines and coax cable in this country to mount an all out assault of microwave auditory effect right inside any home or dwelling anywhere those wires can be addressed.

    They need people milling out for the Big Shill. The best protection the telecommunications mobsters have is surrounding themselves with hired heckling under a pretense of being supplicated to for reform.

  2. @Alex and D.U.M.B.: Get Ben Fulford on the AJ Show, he could talk about the DUMBs and also about the White Hats and other groups which are working on arresting the “Illuminati” and setting up a sane political and economic system, along with also releasing free energy and other patents that have been hidden along with other Black Budget technology, be it reverse engineered alien technology or just some Tesla/Reich technology.

  3. Mr. Bloomberg? Mr.Bloomberg, ppplllllease can we have a permit to fart?
    Noooooooo not allowed! It’s against the law! But but Mr.Bloomberg you
    said you are 100% for freedom of speach. The constitution doesn’t allow that.

    • f a g g o t S O B you think you effin’ own New York? f. off

  4. Isn’t this the same guy that refused to invite 9/11 First Responders to the 2011 memorial observance. I mean what’s up with this guy, Bloomberg? Is he on their side? How did he get to be mayor? Could he possibly be the enemy?

    • He’s one of’em!

  5. The protests that are trying to destroy the jobs of working people is unproductive,” he said. Well, what about the rest of us who have already lost our jobs, homes, cars, etc. I will say it again, unfortunately, until it is your ass up against the wall you just don’t get it and could care less. Oh yea, if we are poor it must be our own fault says ole Herman Cain. We need to sit down and shut up and make sure we don’t contribute to their ass up against the wall like ours is. Well the economy is headed in the toilet. The first to go are always the elderly and Single Moms and kids. But a word to the the rest, that still have your stuff, your day is coming. And when it does, I will get to hear you squeal like the greedy pigs you are.

  6. Jones has problems with anyone who went to a public school. Anyone who disagrees with him. He has problems with women not being subservient enough and gay people for even existing. He judges non-Christians. He despises police, military and science. He opposes any other country which isn’t run by corporate robber barons.

    A very highly-evolved individual.

    • Do you have any evidence of your accusations?

    • screw YOU you freakin’ shill! You’re a highly evolved moanin’ dud. Get lost and stop waistin our time you twit!

  7. Some of the protesters (socialist/communist/nazi party) are pushing the agenda hard, WITH INTENT. The others are just misinformed confused, BY DESIGN. The socialist/communist agenda is targeting the disenfranchised youth who are not aware of what/why/how the state of affairs is what it is. Their history books did not reflect reality. They have been indoctrinated that ‘it takes a village’ through the public education system, and their cognitive function has been assaulted via fluoride, gmo’s, vaccines, ritalin, chemtrails etc etc etc.
    The fight is for the youth! When the system crumbles, and it will, ‘the agenda’ needs the energetic and youthful masses behind it.

    Ever see The Agenda: Grinding Down America
    agendadocumentary.com/ – worth a few bucks and heck, I’ll mail mine to anyone who wants it.

    This is the reason why no matter how many socialist branches get out there and PREY on the crowds, while pushing their agenda, I am more than thankful and have nothing but respect for those who are donating their time, intellegence and resources to get out and expose the real traitors, and protect the 1st Amendment. It’s a battle for who will reach critical mass first, and watching it unfold like some type of sick gladiator spectator sport from the sideline when one ‘could’ be in the battle is what is unpatriotic, in my opinion at least. Naive as it may seem to most of you.

    “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”
    Vladimir Lenin

    “Give me your children and I will have the next generation.” – Adolf Hitler

  8. I don’t get it. In one article these protesters are described as violent, pro-establishment and seeking to undermine our current flawless (laughing as I say it) economic system. But here we see the establishment in the form of Bloomberg attempting to stifle their free speech. Another contradiction. Kind of like unions were supposed to be pro-establishment until we learned that Scott Walker was threatening the National Guard against them. I guess it’s about painting any picture that you wish to convey about a group at any given moment by simply adjusting the color palette?

    • Alex, quit skewing and twisting current events with your rhetoric. The first amendment says “the right of the people peaceably to assemble”… In one article that you have posted it states that 31% are violent. Do you think that might have anything to do with the Mayor’s response that merely says if people do not follow the laws (which is the peaceful part), thereby breaking the constitution themselves, they he would have to ensure the safety of his people which is exactly what government is there for. Shouldn’t your article say “Bloomberg says he will uphold the first Amendment”? I mean really Alex, shouldn’t it? Oh and “screw this” the only contradiction here is Paul Joseph Watson

      • Alex and the rest of the gang too

        • If Alex reads this I just want you to know that I love your research and facts but your reporting skills are mediocre and your headlines are spew lies from the truth… Example? Bloomberg: first amendment doesn’t apply to wall streeters…
          The fact that he said if they don’t follow the rules then they will have to arrest people is actually in the Constitution… If this turns violent then they have no rights under the law Alex… The fact that he is allowing it while it is peaceful shows that he is living up to the constitution… I understand that the message is urgent and you need to counter so much disinformation that you in turn counter that with the “truth”, but the truth is that you lose credibility and integrity with headlines like this one… Sincerely Foskett

        • he wrote to “Wallstreeters TENTS” you idiot! You are just a paid stooge nitpicking and fault finding punk. I hope they throw you in a FEMA camp soon!
          Maybe then you’ll wake up you brain dead pussy-cat.

  9. Put this homosexual eugenic pice of shit in the same prison with guliani.

    • another great comment from the fan section

    • So they can be lovers forever!

  10. Do you believe that the kind of music you listen to influences the way you act?

    Can it uplift you? Can it lead to God? Can it tear you down? Can it lead to murder? Does it steer society in good or bad directions? Can it be used by the New World Order for social engineering?

    Most definitely, yes! We need to understand how and why.

    As is our wont, 4Victory often looks at the big picture. All of the seemingly disconnected elements in our lives are interactive. To look only at the firecrackers thrown at our feet by the enemies of freedom is to miss the big picture. If we miss the big picture, we will not be able to achieve the coherence and insight necessary in our plan for victory.

    Getting a college education in music, you take a variety of courses in that subject, and in at least one of them, music is defined. Usually, it goes something like this: “Music is a series of melodies and/or harmonies organized into rhythmic patterns.” Modern music steps outside those boundaries. But music is much more than this. First, a little perspective:

    The problem with science is that consciousness is considered an artifact, or anomaly, of our brains. In fact, as our other posts on “The Literal Present” have clearly shown, it is the other way around, neurobiologists notwithstanding. Consciousness hosts reality. The physical universe exists because Consciousness dreams it.

    And so, whereas science is usually concerned only with observing HOW things work, it rarely asks WHY. “Why” is off limits, because it makes existence a function, let us say a purposeful function, of Consciousness. Mainstream science just does not get into that, having a haughty disdain for all things metaphysical. But science in a corner, oblivious to the rest of reality, rises little higher than pseudo science.

    Now back to our point that music is much more than organized sound. Beethoven was deaf in his later years but wrote his immortal 9th Symphony hearing the music only in his head. And we too hear music—nonphysical audio—in our heads. Many hear it in dreams. Clearly, music is more than organized, rhythmic sound.

    Music has a function, and this takes many avenues. Classical music, opera music, dance music, wedding music, religious music, music for meditation, romantic music, background music to enhance film and television productions, music to push shopping carts around by, elevator music, patriotic music, propaganda music, piano smashing music, bobbing rock guitars as phallic sympols music, music to warp our consciousness and degrade our character. Ah—what was that last point? Can music really tear us down? The irrefutable scientific evidence is based on RESONANCE and PHASE LOCKING.

    Imagine a tiny wisp of a girl, perhaps four years old, pushing her fat daddy on a swing. Her first push will not send him very far. But if she times it right, applying a little force at the start of each cycle, the father’s oscillations will increase until he is swinging high and wide. Resonance is a scientific principle in engineering. Strong winds induced resonance in the Tacoma Narrows bridge, and down it went. Marching soldiers are told to break cadence when crossing bridges.

    Resonance amplifies the force now being used to manipulate the planet—and our brains! HAARP 101…..!

    Resonance and Phase Locking are interactive. In the 17th Century, Dutch physicist Cristopher Von Huyghens noticed that two clocks, one running slower than the other, ran in sync if placed back to back on a wall. He deduced that two adjacent cyclical systems having nearly the same frequency tend to settle at the same frequency. Science adopted this as the theory of Phase Locking.

    Physics Today had an article years ago (date and author forgotten) documented with mathematical curves showing how the principles above apply not only to physical systems, but also to electrical and chemical systems. Of course, the body is not exempted, and of course, music—as well as movies and video games—has an effect upon the body.

    Granted that music alters our bodies, can it alter our minds? Positively or negatively?

    Tricky question! It alters our brains mechanically, as the brain operates physical, chemical, and electrical systems. But the mind is not the brain. The mind is an interface—a two-way membrane—between the Dreamer (the true eternal self) and the Dream (bodies and worlds). It is not part of the illusory physical universe but serves primarily to communicate experience from Soul to Body, and from Body to Soul. The mind is unique to a particular lifedream, and terminates with it. A new mind appears with a new lifedream. That this seems contrived awaits further exploration of the nature of reality.

    Now to the question: “Can music alter our minds?” Not really, but it communicates the empathy we have with music to the Dreamer, and the Dreamer elects to go with it or modify the Dream. Lucid dreaming, on a more sophisticated scale! Here is the heart of the creation of reality. Inexperienced Dreamers dream bodies who rummage about their dream universe in careless fashion. They move in lower levels of consciousness. Consciousness is the awareness of reality that we bring to solving life’s challenges. Levels of consciousness determine the quality of society.

    Music can lift up individuals and society. Music can be self-destructive to individuals and society.

    The music industry in America was hijacked by the New World Order. Major recording studios, except for a few dedicated to classical music, reject many artists whose styles do not fit their agenda. So we get, on television, on DVDs, on radio, and in public places—junk music—non-music that tears us down, especially rap and gangsta music obsesssing on drugs and obscenities. Subliminal techniques are used to control society. For example, a heavy, steady beat not only resonates the body but also relaxes the vigilance of the brain’s “sentries” at the gate of the mind. In unsuspected ways, musical form, consisting of patterns of repetiton and the manner of variations therefrom, have subtle but extremely powerful influence on our personalities. Lyrics in religious music are sermons in disguise. Musical hypnosis is a book in itself!

    Freedom of speech, ok? And nothing makes some folks more pugilistic than attacks on their choice of music and religion. “Ain’t nobody gonna tell me what I like!”

    Regardless, music is exploited in Illuminati programming for the systematic destruction of humanity. And good music, which humanizes us in a cold, dark world, has been quashed in endless ways, not least, in public schools. For thirty years or more, especially following Reagan, budgets have been quashed for music in particular and the arts in general. They now are regarded as “nonessentials”, and relegated to the nebulous realm of “extra-curricular activities”. Often, these are offered only before the normal class day begins, or after it ends. Science, math, and engineering are all that matters to the Satanists push for technology to control and end our lives.

    The highest conception of music is that it communicates God’s love between Dreamer and Dream—Soul and Body. If the connection is strong, our lives radiate love, and we more rapidly approach God.

    This is part of the big picture. Music is one of many elements, a major dynamic, playing a role in the course of humanity. Could we really live without it? It goes back to human prehistory, if only as beating sticks together. As we struggle to find a better future, knowing we cannot return to the failure mode of the past, search for, and demand, the best in music!

    • “When modes of music change, the fundamental laws of the state always change with them.” – Plato

    • ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_ ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_ ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_

      (Right In Two)
      Monkey killing monkey killing monkey.
      Over pieces of the ground.
      Silly monkeys give them thumbs.
      They make a club.
      And beat their brother, down.
      How they survive so misguided is a mystery.

      Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye,
      to heaven conscious of ones fleeting time here.

      (Reflections)
      I have come curiously close to the end, down
      Beneath my self indulgent pitiful hole. Defeated I
      Concede and move closer. I may find comfort here
      I may find peace within the emptiness. How pitiful.

      It’s calling me

      And in my darkest moment, fetal and weeping.
      The moon tells me a secret. My confidant.
      ‘As full and bright as I am, this light is not my own
      A million light reflections pass over me’
      It’s source is bright and endless.
      She resuscitates the hopeless
      Without her we are lifeless satellites drifting.

      And as I pull my head out
      I am without one doubt
      Don’t want to be down here
      Serving my narcissism I
      Must crucify the ego
      Before it’s far too late
      I pray the light lifts me out

      Before I pine away.

      So crucify the ego
      Before it’s far too late
      To leave behind this place so
      Negative and blind and cynical

      And you will come to find
      That we are all one mind
      Capable of all that’s
      Imagined and all conceivable

      (Vicarious)
      Eye on the TV ’cause tragedy thrills me, whatever flavour It happens to be like;
      Killed by the husband, drowned by the ocean, shot by his own son
      She used the poison in his tea and kissed him goodbye
      That’s my kind of story, it’s no fun ’til someone dies

      Don’t look at me like I am a monster Look at your own face
      as you drool and stare like a junkie into the TV
      Stare like a zombie while the mother holds her child,
      watches him die, hands to the sky crying Why, oh why?
      ’cause I need to watch things die From a distance

      Vicariously I, live while the whole world dies
      You all need it too, don’t lie
      Much better you then I

      ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_ ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_ ”’][”’ {[]} {[]} ][_

  11. “There are places where I think it’s appropriate to express yourself and then there are other places that are appropriate to set up a tent city, and they don’t necessarily have to be one and the same.” The mayor told reporters.

    What exactly does this mean? Where should they set up the tents? Ohio?

    • Yes, that’s what he means.

      • He means “Fuck off hippies, what you do is useless.!”

  12. Here at Occupy Tucson the cops are using “financial attrition”, (the organizer’s words) against the protesters. (true or not, it’s what was reported)
    Meaning if you can afford a “ticket” to the event, and you hang around Armory Park you will likely get arrested.

    It’s easy to call them boneheads, but the saying …”you can’t put an older head on younger shoulders” is true.
    Most people just have to find out for themselves.

    • I’m sorry, can’t instead of can.

      —–30—–

      • Who owns the park?

  13. I know that there is concern over the communism being advocated by some of the protestors. However, free speech is wonderful and allows the reality of the problem to be “aired”. The problem is the banks and the govt in union in criminal activity. The truth will out. Let the protests continue!!

  14. It’s known as IBISS, the acronym for the Integrated Building Interior Surveillance System. Like its name suggests, it can see through the walls of buildings and sketch out images of what’s inside.

    Until this year, IBISS was a classified system, a piece of high-tech wizardry the military used to fight the war on terrorism. The contractor that made the system, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), couldn’t talk about it in public, but that’s changing. IBISS is one of the new products SAIC is hoping to sell to local police stations and fire departments as the defense contractor explores what is known in the industry as “adjacent markets.”

    Adjacent markets can mean anything from foreign militaries to the Department of Homeland Security for the industry that makes the computer systems, software, remote sensors, radar and ground stations that comprise Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) for the military.

    For the first decade of the war on terrorism, the ISR industry thrived, and companies like SAIC, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin made big profits. Those days are coming to an end though.

    On Monday at the annual industry trade conference known as GEOINT, James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, broke the news to the assembled contractors: “We are all going to have to share in the pain.” Clapper said, as his office submitted billions of dollars in cuts to the Office of Management and Budget over the next 10 years. The overall annual intelligence budget is about $80 billion annually; most of the details of those budgets however are secret.

    Gulu Gambhir, the chief technology officer for the ISR group of SAIC, said he has seen this day coming.

    “At SAIC it is certainly no surprise to us that there are pressures on the budget within our key customer space, and we’ve been preparing for these pressures and a potential downturn in certain parts of our ISR market for some time now,” Gambhir told The Daily Beast on Monday.

    He added, “A number of our influential products have dual-use capability to locations and missions adjacent to our primary overseas ISR mission. One such example is local law enforcement, emergency first responders and border protection.”

    Brad Antle, the president and CEO of Salient Federal Solutions and a former vice president of Lockheed Martin, said, “I think it’s logical to assume your adjacent markets for ISR capability, assuming the federal government won’t let you sell it overseas—and it’s pretty sensitive, so I can’t imagine you are going to get much of that approved for foreign sales—they are going to try to push it down to the state and local governments to see if there is a mission to support.”

    Antle said he didn’t think the states and cities had the budget for much of the technology developed for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. “Maybe some limited cities and states; a city like New York might have some budget to support that, but I can’t see broadly how the customers are going to support customers in ISR.”

    Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he has seen this trend for a while of military technology developed for uses overseas finding their way to local law enforcement.

    “In some ways this is the entire trend we’ve been seeing since 9/11. All kinds of capabilities that were developed with an eye to foreign countries are being turned inward upon the American people,” Stanley said. “We’ve seen this with everything from the NSA to spy satellites even to a lot of the technologies that are moving through what is called the green to blue pipeline, which is to say the military to the police.”

    Gambhir said an example of how his company was marketing this new kind of technology was IBISS, a system that uses “through-the-wall radar technology” similar to cell-phone signals. “It allows you to see into the interior of a building to construct a 3-D model of the walls of the building and even see under circumstances people within the building,” he said.

    Stanley, who is the co-author of a forthcoming study on the deployment of surveillance drones to U.S. cities, said local police would have to be very careful with this kind of technology. “Police need to be careful with IBISS because the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to use a thermal imaging technology to peer into someone’s home without a warrant.”

    Others in the industry agreed that the ISR industry was looking to local and state governments. Jason O’Connor, a vice president for engineering at Lockheed Martin’s Information Systems Global Solutions, said his company’s products that specialize in searching through seas of random data ranging from recorded video to field reports also can be sold to emergency first responders, border-protection agencies, and police departments.

    “We’ve been successful with our traditional customers in the age of near-endless information availability,” O’Connor said. “We find adjacencies like emergency response, border protection, security, to need those same types of services and products.”

    Mark Bigham, a vice president at Raytheon’s Intelligence and Information Systems, said his company, which builds ground stations for satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles, believed it could help companies such as Federal Express develop cargo planes that would not need pilots in the future. He also said his company had proposed a way to reduce 10 percent of the costs of a $1 billion satellite ground-station contract Raytheon won last year.

  15. BEST THING TO DO IS FOR BLOOMBERG TO BACK OFF AND SHUT HIS YAP, OR RIOTS WILL BEGIN UNDER HIS WATCH.
    HE’S A PUSSY AND HIS THREATS ARE IDLE.

    • I have issues with that. What about the non-protestors who’s businesses are getting shut down because of the nastiness of these protestors? They are nullifying the rights of those not involved in this protest. That is wrong. I think Bloomberg should have the park “cleaned” up. The private park owner who is being threatened should have the right to have his property back in the same condition it was in before this began. Gaurantee it won’t be these people are the dregs of society.

  16. Looks like the homeless have been replaced by the worthless.

    • Homeless have just as much worth as a king does.

      • Not when they do not produce in society. Either by being a positive role model or actually making society a better place. These protestor are neither. They are the leeches of society looking for the hand out.

        • Which would make them different from the kings how exactly? I’ll tell you, the kings aren’t worried about where their next meal is coming from.

          You high and mighty dimwits think you’re so damn smart with you’re all-or nothing, left-right, black-white bullshit. There is no in between as far as you are concerned.

          We have enough to provide for everyone, period. I guess all the starving people around the world are “leeches of society” also? Let the lazy pricks starve and keep feeding the kings.

  17. Ahh, yes. The ole’ “we’re [only] going to enforce the laws when people start uprising and revolting”. But if you stay in your homes and just “take it up the @ss”, then we’ll let criminals run wild and keep looting you. Hmm, which option to go with?

  18. Hello,

    After watching all the chickens with their heads cut off running around Wall St. and other venues we came up with this sure fire way to peacefully fight back if the gutless.spineless sheepeople will take 30 minutes out of their day to do this! I know, allot to ask right :-}

    Anyway here goes; Anyone who has an account with the following; BANK OF AMERICA,WELLS FARGO,CHASE,CITI BANK,OR ANY OTHER BIG BANK,

    Transfer their accounts to a local Credit Union, or local Community Bank in their town. In fact all CREDIT UNIONS and LOCAL COMMUNITY BANKS will handle the transfer for you, and in some cases offer you certain incentives for doing so. You don’t even need to return to your BIG BOY BANK to do this, and it will only take no more than 30 minutes.

    People seem to have plenty of time camping out on the street, BUT NOTHING IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED! do something that will effect the BIG BOY BANKS BOTTOM LINE NOW,TODAY!

    This idea must get out there. Make it a fun thing to do, have people who transfer their accounts join a list that other people can see, make it the cool thing to do, create a contest for the most people signed up on the “I FOUGHT BACK LIST” ETC.

    I think you get the basic idea, but anyway you do it, DO IT! We must start to actually FIGHT BACK with tangible weapons instead of SHEEPEOPLE RUNNING AROUND LIKE ACID HEADS AT A ROCK CONCERT!

    Can you imagine this catching on; I can see it now Millions of people transferring their accounts in a matter of weeks! A Glorious sight don’t you think?
    So witch one of you FREEDOM FIGHTERS WILL HELP US GET THIS OFF THE GROUND? We need a venue of power that can help sponsor this movement, or Hell you guys can have all the credit if you need it, BUT THIS MUST GET OFF THE GROUND IN INTO REALITY!

    Do you understand the benefits for infowars,Alex Jones, and most of all……………. the PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC?

    THIS WILL WORK IF WE PUT OUR HEADS TOGETHER AND “FIGHT BACK”

    PS: Please reply with your thoughts :-}

    Thanks and God Bless
    Th

  19. Henry Cain?

    Reality, is 9-9-9- a Bad Deal, Why? It Really Lacks Funding For All Programs.

    In addition, Yes, it’s a rip of from 10-10-10 by Ross Perot – Flat Tax Agenda Who ran against, George Hershel Walker Bush – the 41st president, Perot, he who later admitted his running for office was deliberate because he didn’t want to see another year of him as the president of the United States of America.

    “That why – Liar – Liberal , Draft dodger Bill Clinton, became the 42nd President, who, was in fact, impeached by Us Senate for having committed Grand Perjury.”

    Henry Cain ?? Small Government? Yet, limited, or no more public funding – and higher cost for education, and other local, your local programs in your communities.

    What the real cost to you?

    Meanwhile, Mitt Romney, until recently, and Ron Paul – who gets little public air time fair election?

    The Clean Elections Act – Ron Paul 2012 ,

    A Strong, second place Mitt Romney or future Cabinet Member, if Romney, doesn’t run with John McCain as VP ticket.

    End Of Report ,

    Electronically Signed, Robert Lane Aiassa 10/18/2011

  20. “Swing Swing”
    From a rope!

  21. Ah, Bloomberg is concerned about the bankers’ jobs. It’s not the 100′s of productive companies trading on wall street that could also live without wall street selling their real assets somehow else, it’s the Jew York banks, he’s protecting.

  22. Fed-Up California Doctors Finally Band Together on Marijuana

    COMMENTARY | Who do you want deciding which drugs are beneficial for you should you find yourself ill or in chronic pain? Doctors or politicians? That’s the battle going on in California where federal prosecutors of their own volition and in contrast with Obama administration policy have recently targeted medicinal marijuana distributors. Some California doctors have had enough, and on Friday in Anaheim, Calif., according The Huffington Post, members of the California Medical Association called for the legalization of marijuana.

    “It is an open question whether cannabis is useful or not,” said Donald Lyman, a Sacramento physician who wrote the group’s new policy. “That question can only be answered once it is legalized and more research is done. Then, and only then, can we know what it is useful for.”

    For my part, I’m not sure where the argument against the doctors even comes from unless politicians are getting kickbacks from drug cartels. Seriously? Where is the justifiable argument against trusting doctors more than patients on the matter of patient care?

    Doctors are the most trusted scientists in our society. Charged with our well being and mandated under an ethical code more rigorous than that of the Congress or the president, doctors legally prescribe all sorts of drugs, often experimentally, without fear from federal prosecutors and without concern that political decisions will preempt their patient care decisions.

    Of course, the same doctor that prescribes morphine, oxycodone, percoset, ritalin (to children no less), xanex, lithium and any of the other potentially dangerous drugs in their trust should be entrusted with the power to decide whether or not marijuana, that has never been responsible directly for any human death and which has proven to be nonaddictive, should be part of the care decisions they make in their practice of the science of medicine.

    Of course politicians have no jurisdiction in the determination of such matters. What’s baffling is that anyone credibly disagrees.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes