uPont understood that PFOA caused cancerous testicular, pancreatic and liver tumors in lab animals. One laboratory study suggested possible DNA damage from PFOA exposure, and a study of workers linked exposure with prostate cancer. DuPont at last hastened to develop an alternative to PFOA. An interoffice memo sent in 1993 announced that ‘‘for the first time, we have a viable candidate’’ that appeared to be less toxic and stayed in the body for a much shorter duration of time. Discussions were held at DuPont’s corporate headquarters to discuss switching to the new compound. DuPont decided against it. The risk was too great: Products manufactured with PFOA were an important part of DuPont’s business, worth $1 billion in annual profit.
Related posts:
BEST OF THE WEB: Seymour Hersh: There Was No Chemical Weapon Attack On Khan Sheikhoun
Heaviest snow in decades: Evacuations underway as 13,000 tourists trapped in Alps (PHOTOS)
Pay to rape: Australians avoid long jail terms for raping 17yo girl after paying her $22,000
The murky issue of air pollution in North Macedonia
Student Arrested After Using $2 Dollar Bill To Buy Lunch At School
Allies Prepared to Use Chemical Weapons in WW2