The Australian Reports Of Second Explosion In Iranian City Of Isfahan

  • Print

    The Alex Jones Channel
    Alex Jones Show podcast
    Prison Planet TV
    Infowars.com Twitter
    Alex Jones' Facebook
    Infowars store

Zero Hedge
December 2, 2011

While this story has not been caught by any of the major wires, The Australian’s Jerusalem correspondent Sheera Frankel reports something quite disturbing: “All eyes on Israel after second Iranian blast. CLOUDS of smoke billowed above the city of Isfahan – evidence that the latest strike against Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program had hit its target.” We will report more if this story is confirmed by any other news agencies because if true it means that at this point things behind the scenes are no longer happening in the shadows.

As a reminder, from Monday: Satellite Image Confirms Iranian Missile Base Was Destroyed

Today’s curious news report posted by Iran’s semi-official news agency Fars, which was promptly muted, only to be republished by Israel’s Haaretz, of a major explosion near the Iranian city of Isfahan, has left many scratching their heads. As Haaretz reports: “Speaking with Fars news agency, Isfahan’s deputy mayor confirmed the reports and said the authorities are investigating the matter. However, after the incident was reported in Israel, the report was taken off the Fars website.” Which led many to wonder: is this a real event or merely a provocation designed to make Iranians believe they were attacked? Further complicating matters is the just released news from Washington Postwhich shows satellite images of the aftermath of another explosion in Iran, this time from two weeks ago at an Iranian missile base. “The image of the compound, near the city of Malard, doesn’t provide any clues as to what caused the Nov. 12 explosion, which Iranian authorities described as an “accident” involving the transport of ammunition. But it does make clear that the facility has been effectively destroyed. Paul Brannan, a senior analyst for the Institute for Science and International Security, which specializes in the study of nuclear weapons programs, said it’s impossible to tell from the image whether the blast was caused by sabotage, as has has been speculated in this explosion and others at transport facilities, oil refineries and military bases in Iran. Brannan said ISIS had recently learned from “knowledgable officials” that the blast had occurred just as Iran had achieved a milestone in the development of a new missile and may have been performing a “volatile procedure involving a missile engine at the site.” So the question stands: is Iran being systematically attacked with the news being covered up for fear that it can not retaliate and thus seem week; is it being sabbotaged on a weekly basis, or is everything just one big media disinformation campaign designed to provoke Iran to lash out? We will probably know very soon, today’s “oversold” and now completely disconnected from reality rally notwithstanding.

Before satellite image:

The Australian Reports Of Second Explosion In Iranian City Of Isfahan

And After:

The Australian Reports Of Second Explosion In Iranian City Of Isfahan

 


Print
Print this page.

Comment Rules


24 Responses to “The Australian Reports Of Second Explosion In Iranian City Of Isfahan”

  1. Mossad and CIA terrorists is my guess.

    MARK OF THE BEAST Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 10:00 am

    My guess is all of the above.

  2. WWIII designed to be fair and balanced to ensure a longer and more prosperous investment for Rothchild and associate investors in the business of the NWO WAR.
    ________________________________________________________________

    MSM not covering this? No surprise. What about Hammity the long island liberal??
    Well folks he is a very nice guy, but in all honesty he should not be on the air
    shilling for the Saudi Kings. Script readers have no place in reporting truthful news.
    _______________________________________

    I hear a Heather feathering in the backgroound She seems enlightened. Will Parker ever catch on or is he out to the ball game??

  3. This is obviously the result of a “Missle Strike”. Look carefully at the “After Photo”. You will notice numerous, seperate buildings have been destroyed. If it was an accident then there would only be one, maybe two buildings involved. All of these structures have “Structural Damage” as opposed to buildings that would have had explosions and resulting fires. These buildings were not “Burned”, they were “Exploded from above with a “Penetrating Device”. BOMBS, with Israel and America written all over them. Now the question is, ” Will there be a substantial amount of Regional radio-active fallout to deal with”? If there is, then those responsible need to be held to account for this atrocity.
    If neighboring Nations complain about Radio-Active Fallout then this would seem to be because Iran was responsible, however, if they are all silent, that will speak volumes as to who was behind this.

    Philippe Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 10:44 am

    I think Iran is trying to buy all the time they can and prepare as many layers of defense as possible so when the real thing happens, they will be able to fight back legitimately.

  4. Israeli claimed responsibility for the “accident” last month,
    and bragged about many more to follow.
    I have no symapthy for when, fuggem.

  5. Hi Everybody……-ISRAEL massive campaign of terror against Iran is not a policy. It’s a substitute for a POLICY…. It’s a sign of how desperate and hopeless the state of international affairs is regarding IRAN . There is no engagement with Iran, which seems to suit both sides just fine. In the absence of a policy, violence and mischief fill the vacuum. But killing even hundreds of Iranian commanders, scientists, etc. won’t deter IRAN from its goals nor will it prevent a nuclear weapon if that is the NATION’S MISSION . If there is any way to do this, it must be through mutual agreement. If there is no chance for that, then there will be an IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPON (if that is indeed Iran’s goal). The only way to prevent such a development is through a massive military assault on IRAN aiming to overthrow the Ayatollahs and institute a so…called democratic, western backed regime as we did in Iraq. In other words, it ain’t GONNA HAPPEN ……lol….
    Thanks
    Best Wishes

  6. Is the same type DEW Direct Energy Weapon (HARPP maybe?) that took down the Twin Towers, being used in Iran right now?

    Philippe Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 10:45 am

    I had that same initial thought because I figured Israel didn’t want a missile contrail pointing back to Tel Aviv. An energy weapon can fall from the sky and have some minor deniability as to which of the two Satans had launched it.

    Peace Frog Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 11:06 am

    DEW’S ( Directed Energy Weapons ) are now very compact and can be used against you

    at relatively close range…look up electronic harassment

  7. I believe frost and snow is showing on the send picture, making things look much worse.

  8. Those are all explosive impacts from above. An energy weapon that detonates internally would not look like that.

    The fact is Iran won’t admit anything because they’re been Bagdad Bob’s and have bragged too much about their capabilities.
    They can detect NOTHING coming in or going out.
    The new stealth technology is very, very good.

    They’re being struck by F-35′s and from near space platforms.

  9. Apocalyptic Zionists will destroy the planet.

    wiggins Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    It is written.

  10. China will be there with new missiles to prop Iran up.

  11. It’s about to backfire…..for everyone. Goodbye Israel…..and good riddance to you, you apartheid, racist, horrible scumbags.

  12. I think “micro air vehicles” are the tools of choice.

  13. I have my doubts about the images. Could be provocation.
    Looks more like photo-shopped to me.

  14. Just wondering. Where are the impact crators? Color of water different hue?

    Philippe Reply:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 1:20 pm

    Craters don’t awlays appear when buildings are blown up. Remember concrete floors are a lot stronger than dirt. Water colours can appear to change due to time of day or if rains or wind have caused a lot of motion in the water.

  15. Of course you can’t retaliate in the same manner,in a country that is a prison.Isreal keeps their people locked up like a gulag,checkpoints everywhere.Why would a world outside hate someone so much that their only chance for survival is to create a virtual prison.That is what they would like to do,expand their prison to encompass as much of the world as possible.Go-Isrealis-tell yourself you are free,the world outside is wicked,you are the chosen ones.You may soon learn that a thousand nukes wern’t enough to protect your little slab of hell on EARTH

  16. That was a big f-in explosion, on the left side center, looks like the impact was there. If the orientation of the image is due north then that means a missile or more came from the west to east. Now this does not mean it was Israel, looks like a bombing site facility, you know a place where you blow stuff up with missiles??? How do I know this? Well looking at the first photo, there seems to be hardly anything there…no vehicles, no missile launchers, not even a truck. I think it was a bomb testing facility. The missile wasn’t that big either meaning it might have a standard bunker bomber.

  17. Things are rolling along just fine…

  18. These pictures look more like those of a construction site to me.

    Put the after picture first and than the before picture.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes