FBI Exec Calls for Changes in Internet Technology

  • Print

    The Alex Jones Channel
    Alex Jones Show podcast
    Prison Planet TV
    Infowars.com Twitter
    Alex Jones' Facebook
    Infowars store

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 30, 2012

Shawn Henry, an FBI executive assistant director, admitted today that the ramped up and over-hyped effort by the government to put an end to hacking will not work unless there are “changes in technology.”

FBI Exec Calls for Changes in Internet Technology Mr. Henry did not specify what changes he had in mind, but despite this we have a good idea since the government has harangued us for years now on the changes it has in mind – nothing short of revamping the internet.

The establishment keeps telling us the internet is broken and we must start over. “Last year, the level and ferocity of cyber-attacks on the internet reached such a horrendous level that some are now thinking the unthinkable: to let the internet wither on the vine and start up a new more robust one instead,” professor Alan Woodward, billed as a cybersecurity expert, told the BBC earlier this year.

Congress proposed Obama be allowed to shut down the internet with a kill switch – sort of like the dictator Mubarak shutting down the internet, but on steroids – but the proposal was shelved in response to criticism and outrage. The SOPA and PIPA Trojan Horses also faced withering criticism and were subsequently withdrawn (or sent back to be modified and appear less draconian up re-introduction).

The Europeans are one step ahead of rustic Americans. They don’t have an antiquated and quaint (as the globalists see it) Constitution and Bill of Rights. For the European elites, freedom of speech is extended by government as it was once handed down by kings. It is not an innate or god-given right. It is a privilege that can be withdrawn at any time.

Last August, the European Commissin drafted a number of propsoals designed to regulate the internet, including the creation of a list of names, drawn up by governments, that would be banned from registering with the internet’s domain name system. If recent history is any indicator, the list will contain the names of websites and individuals who are not politically correct (for instance, websites that question aspects of the Holocaust would almost undoubtedly be banned as would those making apologies for Nazism or that deviate from official histories).

EC papers drawn up last August “also foresee that the enormous shift in power toward governments will happen within the next 12 months.” The documents appear to coincide with efforts on this side of the pond to propose drastic internet technology changes in response to supposed cyber security concerns.

Henry’s “grim appraisal of the nation’s efforts to keep computer hackers from plundering corporate data networks” published by the Wall Street Journal is the latest foray by the elite to lend an air of legitimacy to an ongoing effort to ultimately sanitize the internet and turn it into a corporatized Disneyland offering meaningless cultural and political pablum and where no serious challenges to the elite will be permitted (as they are not currently on the dinosaur television media platform owned largely by transnational communications corporations).

“I don’t see how we ever come out of this without changes in technology or changes in behavior, because with the status quo, it’s an unsustainable model. Unsustainable in that you never get ahead, never become secure, never have a reasonable expectation of privacy or security,” Henry said.

In February, NSA boss Gen. Keith Alexander made the absurd claim that the suspicious hacktivist collective Anonymous would be able to take down the nation’s power grid via the internet. As we noted at the time, it is not easy to disrupt the power grid in the United States. Most systems use proprietary operating systems and applications that are “not readily available for study by your average hacker,” writes Michael Tanj. Power grid systems and networks are not connected to the public internet.

Once again, Anonymous was being used (like a useful idiot is used) as an excuse by the government as it continue to roll out increasingly draconian surveillance programs under the aegis of “cyber security” and terror prevention.

As The Daily Bell notes, the ruling elite’s memes are beginning to crumble due to coverage by the alternative media.

“What the Internet has shown us with increasing clarity over this past decade is that Western banking elites and their enablers and associates will stop at nothing in their quest for ultimate power,” they write.

The exposure of the elite’s goals and its methodologies – its dependence on the corrupt counterfeiting practices of central banks for the trillion-dollar torrents of capital necessary to build world government – has led to an upswell of indignation and scrutiny around the world.

As a result, many of the elite’s dominant social themes are beginning to founder and fail. The elites had high hopes apparently for installing a carbon currency around the world based on the fraudulent message of global warming. But the Internet helped reveal emails that exposed the fraud.

The so-called war on terror has long been revealed to be both fraudulent and unpopular. Creating a so-called long war to generate the kind of chaos that is necessary to move the world toward global governance is perhaps a good idea from an elite standpoint … but not one that has worked out well.

As elite memes have degraded, the attacks on the Internet have stepped up.

The FBI’s Henry is merely the latest government character to call for “changes in technology” that will if implemented not so much protect corporations as usher in a new era of control and banish the truth tellers to a pre-internet wilderness.

Print
Print this page.

Comment Rules


12 Responses to “FBI Exec Calls for Changes in Internet Technology”

  1. Federal Bureau of Incineration – the same cowards who shot to death Vicki Weaver for the high crime of breast-feeding her infant son in her own home.

    ALEA Reply:
    March 30th, 2012 at 3:04 pm

    Dont worry Alex Jones is on their side, so he will be left free to keep you chasing shadows. You will always have this control center of BS. The turd in the info war aint going anywhere. So relax Alex Jones’ message is important to the FBI.

    Quantummonkeybutt Reply:
    March 30th, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    “Dont worry Alex Jones is on their side, so he will be left free to keep you chasing shadows. You will always have this control center of BS. The turd in the info war aint going anywhere. So relax Alex Jones’ message is important to the FBI.”

    ALEX JONES IS CIA OPERATION
    ALEX JONES LOVES THE EVIL
    ALEX JONES HAS BECAME A F R E E M A S O N
    DEMONS ARE INSIDE ALEX JONES
    QMB CURSES INFOWARS PP
    ILLUMINATI FEARING QMB ASH
    QMB CURSES BARAQ u BAMAH NAMES
    QMB A ENEMY ILLUMINATI WAR

    equals

    12 – 5
    5 + 2
    6 + 1

    flaming_red_pill Reply:
    March 30th, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    could it be that their budget is getting cut and they are sick of playing cybercop for retards when there are zodiac serial killer cops to hunt down on long island? oh yeah. dig more, guys, the Bones are hard at work as ever 🙁

    the FBI ain’t the root of all evil,
    they deal with a lot of stupid shit
    and like an elementary school,
    they relay what’s “current” not necessarily “Right”

    does that make them all evil? nope

    also people who hate the FBI
    want you to NOT report crime and abuse
    which hurts our country…
    common sense

    flaming_red_pill Reply:
    March 30th, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    The FARCE BEHIND IT [all]

    just kidding XD

    Here is something to read (i wrote this in response to a foxnews FBI retiree article two days ago):

    Cyber Vulnerability and the Idiocy of Infrastructure Fusion, and a Question for the FBI about Physical Security VS Cybersecurity, and Narrowing Access to Vital Information Channels and Getting those Channels off the Public Networks. Duh! Also Looking at Roman Signal Towers, the Malta Oracle Chamber, and Man’s Infinite Heritage.
    Posted on March 28, 2012

    “I wanted to show you an article from Foxnews regarding the opinion of a retiring FBI official who says that current attempts to stymie cyberattacks against large corporations are failing completely. This article is reposted with links at bottom.

    Question: why hasn’t the FBI simply encouraged corporations, power plants, businesses, private individuals and the like to implement a strictly “offline backup” operations system, providing a set of guidelines to that effect but leaving enforcement up to said entities? This functions in line with Frank Herbert’s “Tansley Effect” where non-sensitive vital information is publicly shared for the greater good and rapid development of all, whereas true “intelligence” is handled at the discretion of leadership. Intelligence meaning information vital to war or preventing war, or significant national loss. I guess.

    Another Question: Why would the FBI or any other agency shoulder such a burden rather than rightfully transfer the responsibility of security and data management back to the goddamned originating companies who profit from disasters as often as they lose? For example, heavily-invested Wall Street speculators would often love to crash a competitor’s company and divide up the pieces, or stomp on them. Shareholders who can throw billions around in the wake of turmoil, or right before terrorism strikes, should be regarded with as much NSA suspicion as any desperate immigrant or penniless crazy. Know what I mean, Gene?

    I would be very furious if I were a detective and all my hours were spent on petty fraud cases and corporate hack attempts. Why can’t one single scientist with a voice stand up and simply state, “we need to take some of our capabilities offline”. Meaning off the fockin’ Internet. Sometimes, readers, “Less is more”. Yeah?

    When you are dealing with issues of physical security, “Less is definitely more”. Fewer points of access means more security. More vigilant guards per real door, and fewer doors, equals more security. With the right physical system in place, honed down and made efficient through practice and criticism, the security of many agencies and companies around the world, to say the least, would improve.

    For example: it is said that some of the Roman emperors and generals sent signals and messages over very long distances via the use of a simple system of lighthouses or signal towers. If you’ve seen “The Lord of the Rings”, you have seen a primitive representation of Roman communications technology in action. When Gandalf has one of his Hobbit friends scale a Gondor guard tower and set fire to a large stack of wood maintained at that location, a chain of SOS signals is near-instantly sent to the nation of Rohan by a series of similar guard towers, to which Rohan responds by sending its cavalry to the battlefield within mere days of message receipt.

    Unless there’s a blizzard, hurricane, volcano, or other anomalously disastrous event, can a single one of you readers tell me how this system is less efficient or secure than modern electronic communications and signaling systems? I know that an uncovered bonfire is of limited use in terms of sending a long message, but a shielded blaze, such as you see in a lighthouse, is capable of transmitting messages even in complicated encryption. Just by passing an object in front of your light, you can send a signal all the way to the horizon. The Romans used crystals and lenses much like Archimedes did in order to focus and concentrate the light and send their messages a bit farther on.”

    _______________________________________________

    CATCH THE WAVE @ nuclearnuttery .wordpress ! 🙂 thanks for helping keep information free.

  2. The bureau of justice and love has recently learned of a horrible crime. Apparently little
    girls have been stealing candy from local stores. As you may know, the economic toll of
    this theft is more than our aging society can bear.

    In order to provide for the common good I am ordering a house to house search for these
    lost sweets. Children are very intelligent and can easily hide a large stash outside
    our loving supervision. Therefore, each agent will need to secure the door of their
    room with agent child inside to avoid escape of valuable assets.

    Parents are urged to be patient as the search for missing candy can often take hours.
    Only an ignorant conspiracy theorist would call the noises from aforementioned locked door
    anything but the sounds of malfeasant children resisting justice.

    Please excuse our giddy attitudes and the bloody look in our eyes. These are the inevitable
    and unfortunate result of our glorious quest to recover all the stolen candy.

    Yours Truly,

    Commandante Satan

  3. Shutting down the Internet would be like giving the nation a prefrontal lobotomy.
    I would prefer a bottle in front of me.

    Thoughts for Incurable Kinds of Images.
    Click hotlink.

  4. The bottom line is the Internet and the free flow of information is the enemy of a tyranny. They apparently misjudged the power of the Internet and their lack in ability to control it as they do main stream media which was a success. They will stop at nothing to take control and censor it and justly so they have realized they can’t. Plus they can’t control the Internet of all countries. Between proxies, VPN’s and DNS they cannot stop anyone from one country to get information from another country regardless of what they do. If they plan on creating a “new technology” and create a new Internet or a 2.0v they will not succeed either. They can’t control all of the ISP’s either because there are too many. In comparison to their control of television there are only so many main news channels and money has bought them all but how could they buy all websites and ISP’s? Can’t. Anonymous is just another boogeyman they are using as an excuse to control what they can’t control and to attempt pushing more draconian bills that will be fought tooth and nail by the people. Supposedly Anonymous is going to take down all of the “main core DNS servers” and that sounds pretty silly considering these servers have and distribute DNS info to the ISP’s DNS servers which they have their own the Internet users interact with. When you type in a website name or a search does it for you it only goes to your ISP’s DNS server, not the core servers that are DNS databases. Users never interact with a core DNS server database. SO.. Anonymous/government would have to attack all ISP’s DNS servers simultaneously in this country which is in the thousands and most have recursion disabled. If suddenly you can’t get to a website it’s not a DNS amplification recursion attack which is impossible but the government but if this happens type this IP address in your browser if something happens 74.125.226.46 this is Google’s IP address. Prison Planet is 64.27.28.180. Type in browser address bar and enter. If DNS is down it will still take you to the website. If won’t then they have somehow shut down the Internet nationally and Anonymous is the cover for this test.

    dncholas Reply:
    March 30th, 2012 at 3:26 pm

    To be specific if tomorrow the DNS stops working or the Internet fails for any reason as we are told Anonymous will do, you’ll know whether it’s DNS or the Internet itself by testing those IP addresses in the browser, it’s impossible and the government either got the major ISP’s to do this or they have setup their own EAS type hardware, like with radio and television, and this will be a test. If this was possible what they claim will be DNS taken down anyone who runs a server that amazingly doesn’t have DNS recursion disabled, which is the only way this would work, could easily disable this in advance. It’s like a car thief telling the person who owns the car if he leaves his keys in the car and the door open he will steal it that night.

  5. I think a conspiracy is afoot. Check out the ping times since the FBI
    attacked.

    PING prisonplanet.com (64.27.28.180): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=46.558 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=43.731 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=48.327 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=43.091 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=45.487 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=53.321 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=43.851 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=47.827 ms
    64 bytes from 64.27.28.180: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=43.129 ms
    ^C
    — prisonplanet.com ping statistics —
    9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 43.091/46.147/53.321/3.148 ms
    $ ping prisonplanet.tv
    PING prisonplanet.tv (173.226.180.133): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=85.583 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=87.326 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.774 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=87.405 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=97.293 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=88.138 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=92.102 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=90.877 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=88.721 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=85.633 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=86.260 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=11 ttl=57 time=88.599 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=12 ttl=57 time=87.969 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=13 ttl=57 time=87.847 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=14 ttl=57 time=92.903 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=15 ttl=57 time=91.822 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=16 ttl=57 time=88.114 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=17 ttl=57 time=93.516 ms
    64 bytes from 173.226.180.133: icmp_seq=18 ttl=57 time=98.879 ms

  6. Before we go after hackers…..let’s stop the FBI from breaking laws….
    ……and jail FBI director and criminal Mueller!!

  7. Yeah, I mean how daya expect the Feds to sell guns to Mexico if everybody can find out ? Especially when running drugs too ? ! 😉

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes