Jew World Order

Recently a friend of mine D.J. flew to Phuket Thailand for a holiday on March 3, 2014. Prior to the illusive disappearance of flight MH370 and just following the planes vanishing act, she returned to Canada.  She joins us in conversation regarding her flight experience and recounted her experience in the Asian Airports during the unfolding of events surrounding the missing flight.

During her trip to Asia she experienced several times where they not only scanned her passport extensively, but also took pictures of her and her husband before they entered the country, as well again when they left Thailand.
She recounts for us how security during the flight across was no different than when she returned.  Her encounter with security and how the flight pilots were NOT subjected to any type of security protocol’s the ordinary passengers were. She describes the details of how she found out about the flight MH370’s disappearance and what the reaction of both locals as well as fellow passengers were during her return flight.
It is interesting to me how she recounts her flight paths deviation of 45 minutes into land mass from their original course over the ocean. While we are told by the mainstream media the search area is on land mass. She expresses her path would actually take you over what is believed to be the then current or active search area location. I noticed while reviewing different details of the flight path being pushed by the mainstream media that the flight apparently veered towards land. Why then (begs the questions) did they detour over the said search area and not over the ocean as usual. You would think they would need to keep the area of search clear. Unless they are actually searching over the ocean and not releasing or conveying that information to the public. Why hid the parameters of the search area? Why lie about the location of suspicion? Reason being (in my opinion) is to keep this flight as obscure and mysterious as possible. I am of the opinion the flight either never occurred, or was re-directed to some island out towards the Pacific.
DJ tells us of the extent of scanning her passport was subjected to, and asks the question “Why even have a passport at all, if they are not interlinked to some (as we are lead to believe) data base? The passports were apparently stolen 2 years prior to this incident. Why would they not have this information on record?  What I also find interesting is the fact the mainstream media initially reported that the individuals who had their passports stolen were also scheduled to be on that very flight MH370. Whom would have known their plans to board? Unless this is a setup or staged event from the beginning. No person who has stolen your passport (2 years prior) would have access to know what flight or travel arrangements you had made with a new passport. The whole scenario begins to fall apart once you look a bit closer at what the media is trying to have you believe.
Another interesting feature to the interview was regarding the non-reaction or non-lock down circumstances once the airplane disappeared. Security was neither tighten nor protocols changed in order to prevent further breaches in the system. It still leaves me wondering whether or not this whole flight even occurred. Was it an excuse to disappear a number of high ranking individuals aboard the flight? Was it and excuse to accost certain very intelligent assets in the electromagnetic technology industry. It has been stated in various article those in the manifest are in fact very important science and technology inventors. While in fact they are not actually releasing the manifest to the public. Speculation or not there are many questionable circumstances surrounding this flight, its path, and the continued search for its whereabouts. Be that as it may, there is defiantly something wrong about the whole story they detail out to us as facts.
It must be noted that various experienced pilots have come forward to shoot holes into the mainstream story. Boeing 777 had a lawsuit that was pursued post 911 to stop any such hijacking from occurring again. Please watch attached video from Able Danger regarding the lawsuit. It was stated by Boeing they would have these auto pilots in place by 2006. If this suit towards Boeing was not in place, then they would be the major avenue to pursue regarding insurance or compensation to family member of the losses of their relatives.

Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot

I am a retired Delta pilot. On 10 December, 2006 I informed FAA, FBI and NWA of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot. It was used against Adam Air 574 in a manner consistent with the loss yesterday of the B777 enroute Kaula Lampur to China.

Please advise me if Delta ALPA Safety Reps have educated the Delta Pilot Group of the BUAP that I forced Boeing to announce on 3 March, 2007 in response to my lawsuit filed against Boeing and ALPA of 27 February, 2007. That lawsuit was Civil Case 3:07-cv-24 and resulted in Boeing doing the right thing in announcing the deployment of the BUAP to be completed by March, 2009. Here is the article of Boeing’s response to my lawsuit:

New autopilot will make another 9/11 impossible

My question to DPA and Delta ALPA Safety is on what date did Delta ensure that all Delta pilots are aware of what Boeing has stated 7 years ago would be installed by March, 2009.

The significance is that if any ALPA pilots are not aware of this ‘feature’ they cannot comply with FAR 121.533.

In regards to yesterday’s B777 hull loss expect to see the attached tax document anchoring a chapter published demonstrating the similarities of yesterday’s loss to Adam Air 574 to Sukhoi Superjet lost in May, 2012.

Please note that defattru email address goes to Russian Air Force, Sukhoi and GRU. If you are not aware of who GRU is perhaps you should be.

Abel Danger

TeamWakeEmUP

Thx for visiting MaxResistance.com plz click on home page for more news and videos.

Also plz bookmark the home page and click the follow button on the bottom right of your screen thx!