Privacy uproar as Google unveils new ‘one-size fits all’ policy across YouTube, search and Gmail

  • Now users will be bombarded with ads related to their online searches
  • Critics say company will amass ‘cauldron of data’ on users
  • Company says products will be ‘beautifully simple and intuitive’

By
Ted Thornhill

Last updated at 1:12 PM on 25th January 2012

Google has been savaged by critics after revealing plans to link user data across its email, video, social-networking and other services.

In a move denounced by some as a massive invasion of privacy, the changes will piece together information from Gmail to YouTube to the Google Plus social network.

For example, if you spend an hour on Google searching the Web for skateboards, the next time you log into YouTube, you might get recommendations for videos featuring Tony Hawk, along with ads for his merchandise and the nearest place to buy them.

However, this could also apply to searches relating to sensitive topics such as health issues. It’s also bad news for people who use pornography.

Privacy problems are particularly pertinent to those who share email with other members of their family.

Under fire: Google's new privacy policy comes into effect on March 1

Under fire: Google’s new privacy policy comes into effect on March 1

Cecilia Kang, of the Washington Post, described collation of vast tracts of information as a ‘massive cauldron of data.’

‘Privacy advocates say Google’s changes betray users who are not accustomed to having their information shared across different Web sites.’ she said.

‘A user of Gmail, for instance, may send messages about a private meeting with a colleague and may not want the location of that meeting to be thrown into Google’s massive cauldron of data or used for Google’s maps application.’

Technology site Gizmodo said that the change was the end of Google’s ‘don’t be evil motto.

The site’s Mat Honan wrote: ‘It means that things you could do in relative anonymity today, will be explicitly associated with your name, your face, your phone number.

‘If you use Google’s services, you have to agree to this new privacy policy. It is an explicit reversal of its previous policies.’

Larry Dignan, meanwhile, writing on ZDnet.com, described the new policy as ‘Big Brother-ish’.

He wrote: ‘Google will know more about you than your wife does. Everything across your screens will be integrated and tracked.

‘Google noted that it collects information you provide, data from your usage, device information and location. Unique applications are also noted.

‘Sure you can use Google’s dashboard and ad manager to cut things out, but this policy feels Big Brother-ish.’

The changes, due on March 1, are a massive overhaul of Google’s privacy policy which the company claims will create a ‘beautifully simple and intuitive’ user experience.

More than 70 different company policies are being streamlined into one main privacy policy and about a dozen others.

Separate policies will continue to govern products including Google’s Chrome Web browser and its Wallet service for electronic payments.

Google’s last attempt to link information across its services triggered a wave of privacy complaint which helped kill the its Buzz social networking service. 

The company hopes to avoid similar legal hurdles with its new policy.

“If you’re signed into Google, we can
do things like suggest search queries – or tailor your search results –
based on the interests you’ve expressed in Google (Plus), Gmail and
YouTube,’ the company says on a new overview page for its privacy
policies.

Defence: Google argues that its new policy will give users 'a more intuitive experience'

Defence: Google argues that its new policy will give users ‘a more intuitive experience’

‘We’ll better understand (what) you’re searching for and get you those results faster.’

Currently, users of Google products have to agree to a new set of privacy policy and terms of services almost every time they sign up for a new service.

After the new policy comes into effect, if you’re signed in, you’ll be treated as a single user across all of Google’s products.

‘If you’re signed in, we may combine information you’ve provided from one service with information from other services,’ Google’s director of privacy, product and engineering, Alma Whitten wrote in blog post.

‘In short, we’ll treat you as a single user across all our products, which will mean a simpler, more intuitive Google experience.’

Google pointed out that cookies and ‘identifiers’ will not be tagged to sensitive categories, such as those based on race, religion, sexual orientation or health.

It also emphasised that the new privacy policy will not force users to become Google Plus account holders and that it will still be possible to sign in to Google and search anonymously

The changes follow the shutdown of Buzz last month. After its introduction less than two years ago, the social networking tool was ridiculed for exposing users’ most-emailed contacts to other participants by default, inadvertently revealing some users’ ongoing contact with ex-spouses and competitors.

Google has since made Plus the focal point of its challenge to Facebook’s social network.

In the first seven months since its debut, Plus has attracted more than 90 million users, according to Google.

To promote Plus, Google recently began including recommendations about people and companies with Plus accounts in its search results.

That change has provoked an outcry from critics who say Google is abusing its dominance in Internet search to drive more traffic to its own services.

Google and the Federal Trade Commission reached a settlement last year that forbids Google from misrepresenting how it uses personal information and from sharing an individual’s data without prior approval.

Google also agreed to biennial privacy audits for the next two decades.

Google said it talked to regulators about the upcoming privacy changes, which it will apply worldwide. An FTC spokeswoman declined to comment on the changes or say whether the agency was consulted.

Some critics saw Google as trying to beat regulators to the punch by setting a precedent before the FTC unveils its own framework for protecting online privacy.

Jeff Chester, executive director of the privacy group Center for Digital Democracy, said Google hopes ‘that by creating a one-stop shop for privacy policy it will deflect regulatory action.’

Google, Facebook and other popular Internet services all want to learn as much as possible about their users so they can sell more advertising at higher rates to marketers looking to target people interested in specific products, such as golf clubs or skinny jeans.

Google says users who opt to see personalised ads are 37 percent more likely to respond to an ad than people who opt out of targeting.

The changes follow a rare letdown in revenue growth at Google’s lucrative advertising network.

Google’s fourth-quarter earnings report last week showed the company’s average revenue per click fell 8 percent from the previous year, despite robust growth in online shopping at the holidays.

Google shares, which have fallen 9 percent since the report, closed Tuesday at $580.93, down $4.59 for the day.

Ryan Calo, director for privacy at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, said Google is trying to make its policy privacy transparent instead of bogging users down with pages of legalese; the new privacy policies run about 10,000 words, down from 68,000.

But he said the company must ensure that the ways it uses data help users without revealing sensitive information.

‘If it creeps people out, then they need to be aware of that,’ he said.

Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Google’s own drive and greed to be the worlds biggest census will push users towards other products. Facebook, Google, Apple and MS have vast, vast amounts of personal data that they all sell to the highest bidder. Do what I do, where possible avoid them. I no longer have a FB, Google or Apple accounts. I’ve only got MS account for hotmail so I can play Xbox and even that’s fake! If you didn’t give your information away these companies would fall away and another thats wllling to keep your info private will soon step into their shoes.

It doesn’t matter, a new EU law (finally something positive from Brussels) will give us the right to be choose to be ‘forgotten’ by companies if we so desire – so you can force Google to delete all information it holds on you.

I tried to get my email G+ account name changed to include numbers (an old gamer tag I use) for 10+ years – failed the G+ request..yesterday
looks like l3tt3r5 4r3 th3 0rd3r 0f th3 d4y 🙁

Just use a different email address for all services like Google, facebook, twitter, googlemail etc so that way they cannot link you.

That’s why I have separate accounts for each…

This is potentially why Google have allowed users to add nicknames to their accounts. So annonymous tasks can retain their anonymity.
Blizzard attempted a similar thing with their users by adding real names to the nicknames people used on their forum. Their was uproar from fans whose previous data would now show their real name and Blizzard reversed the change.
So this type of thing has caused issues before, and it will be interesting to see how people respond. I doubt more people will notice – for example most Facebook users are amazed to hear how much information about them is shared. Unless people are told they’ll never know.
Mike Essex (@Koozai_mike)

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes