The law pertains to “any individual or company seeking a contract with the state”.
JeffB then opines that for Kansas to treat her as a “W2 temporary employee” would be a procedural error and scuttle the lawsuit. Or, for Kansas to treat her as a 1099 individual contracter would be “very unlikely for a state agency”, and he suspects “illegal” (despite never having done business with Kansas). This too would allegedly scuttle the lawsuit. Thus, there is no way for Kansas to hire her as an individual contractor and apply this law, according to JeffB’s suspicions and estimates of what is likely and unlikely.
Despite the fact that the Kansas contracting agency sent Koontz the Israeli loyalty pledge for her signature, JeffB is sure they didn’t know what they were doing. JeffB goes on:
“Her lawsuit is based on the state having offered her a contract, and I suspect that Kansas is going to argue she was never offered a contract at all.”
In fact, despite her being selected to participate in the program, she was not offered a contract because she refused to sign the Israeli loyalty pledge. Further, the law refers to any individual “seeking” a contract, which means before a contract is offered.
I look forward to JeffB, with his tangled BS, as the lawyer defending Israeli criminals on trial in Nuremburg.
“Opening Address of Robert Jackson at Nuremberg Trials”
http://wwwthesixthestate.blogspot.com/2007/10/opening-address-of-robert-jackson-at.html
For new readers, JeffB thoroughly shredded his credibility, unable to deal honestly with facts or logic, in the extended discussion here:
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/05/times-rudoren-selma
RSS Feed
October 14th, 2017 
Awake Goy 
Posted in 
Tags: 
