RSS Feed
June 17th, 2013 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda 
The threat of imprisonment or murder will not stop the truth from coming out, Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who blew the lid on the massive National Security Agency surveillance program, told the Guardian in a live Q&A.
The 29-year-old former NSA contractor in conjunction with Glenn
Greenwald, The Guardian journalist who broke the story on the
NSA’s two controversial data-collection programs which targeted
Americans and foreign allies alike, took questions online regarding the fallout from
the massive intelligence leak.
Edward Snowden kicked off the session by describing the targeted
campaign by the US government to paint him as a traitor, “just as
they did with other whistleblowers. The smear campaign, he
argues, has destroyed possibility of a fair trial at home. In
this regard, his decision to leave the United States was not
based on any desire to evade justice, especially since he
believes he can “do more good outside of prison.”
Snowden realized his choice of Hong Kong as a refuge would stir
up anti-Chinese hysteria in the US media and be used as a tool to
“distract away from the issue of US government
misconduct.” He remained emphatic, however, that he had in no
way shape or form acted on behalf of Beijing, saying that he
“only works with journalists.”
“Ask yourself: if I were a Chinese spy, why wouldn’t I have flown
directly into Beijing? I could be living in a palace petting a
phoenix by now.”
He was further dismissive of the perennial, dual-pronged approach
from US officials to play the terror card in an effort to shut
down discussion regarding their every increasing authority and
the traitor angle to dismiss those who advocate government
transparency.
Regarding the former tactic, Snowden argues the fourth estate can
verify the veracity of government claims by analyzing how and if
the government’s massively expanded powers have resulted in the
actual prevention of terror plots.
“Journalists should ask a specific question: since these
programs began operation shortly after September 11th, how many
terrorist attacks were prevented SOLELY by information derived
from this suspicionless surveillance that could not be gained via
any other source? Then ask how many individual communications
were ingested to achieve that, and ask yourself if it was worth
it. Bathtub falls and police officers kill more Americans than
terrorism, yet we’ve been asked to sacrifice our most sacred
rights for fear of falling victim to it.”
Snowden further deployed his considerable wit to cast aspersion
on members of the US political elite who had led leveled the
traitor charge against him.
“It’s important to bear in mind I’m being called a traitor by
men like former Vice President Dick Cheney. This is a man who
gave us the warrantless wiretapping scheme as a kind of atrocity
warm-up on the way to deceitfully engineering a conflict that has
killed over 4,400 and maimed nearly 32,000 Americans, as well as
leaving over 100,000 Iraqis dead. Being called a traitor by Dick
Cheney is the highest honor you can give an American, and the
more panicked talk we hear from people like him, [Democratic
Senator Dianne] Feinstein, and [Republican Senator Peter]King,
the better off we all are. If they had taught a class on how to
be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney worries about, I would have
finished high school.”
Living a life on the run had previously led Snowden to say that
none of the options ahead of him were good, but his ultimate goal
would be realized no matter what fate became him.
“All I can say right now is the US Government is not going to
be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me. Truth is
coming, and it cannot be stopped.”
Despite the risks, his message to other potential whistleblowers
was unequivocal: “This country is worth dying for.”
“Snowden, who had previously stated that he painstakingly
evaluated every document he had disclosed to ensure that it was
legitimately in the public interest, reiterated that had not in
fact posed a national security threat.
“I did not reveal any US operations against legitimate
military targets. I pointed out where the NSA has hacked civilian
infrastructure such as universities, hospitals, and private
businesses because it is dangerous. These nakedly, aggressively
criminal acts are wrong no matter the target,” he argued.
When pressed over whether it was his intention to insinuate that
Bradley Manning, the United States soldier currently on trial for
passing classified material to WikiLeaks, indiscriminately dumped
classified information with the intention of harming people, the
former CIA employee defended both the Army Private and the online
non-profit.
“Wikileaks is a legitimate journalistic outlet and they
carefully redacted all of their releases in accordance with a
judgment of public interest. The unredacted release of cables was
due to the failure of a partner journalist to control a
passphrase. However, I understand that many media outlets used
the argument that ‘documents were dumped’ to smear Manning, and
want to make it clear that it is not a valid assertion here.”
Snowden said the “draconian” campaigns against Manning, NSA
whistleblower Thomas Drake, and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou
would result in even more anti-corruption and government
transparency advocates aspiring to greater acts of boldness.
“Binney, Drake, Kiriakou, and Manning are all examples of how
overly-harsh responses to public-interest whistle-blowing only
escalate the scale, scope, and skill involved in future
disclosures. Citizens with a conscience are not going to ignore
wrong-doing simply because they’ll be destroyed for it: the
conscience forbids it. Instead, these draconian responses simply
build better whistleblowers. If the Obama administration responds
with an even harsher hand against me, they can be assured that
they’ll soon find themselves facing an equally harsh public
response.”
Despite being deeply disillusioned with the Obama administration,
which Snowden claims “closed the door on investigating
systemic violations of law, deepened and expanded several abusive
programs,” he believes the president has not yet reached the
point of no return.
“He still has plenty of time to go down in history as the
President who looked into the abyss and stepped back, rather than
leaping forward into it.”
With the promise of further revelations, Snowden dispelled any
disinformation intended to downplay the scope of US Intelligence
surveillance capabilities, describing a murky legal framework
with virtually no oversight which gives signals intelligence
analysts carte blanche when it comes to the collection of
American’s private communications.
“…if an NSA, FBI, CIA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), etc.
analyst has access to query raw SIGINT (signals intelligence)
databases, they can enter and get results for anything they want.
Phone number, email, user id, cell phone handset id (IMEI), and
so on – it’s all the same. The restrictions against this are
policy based, not technically based, and can change at any time.
Additionally, audits are cursory, incomplete, and easily fooled
by fake justifications. For at least GCHQ, the number of audited
queries is only 5% of those performed.”
Snowden continues that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court essentially acts as a rubberstamp judicial body which, for
all intents and purposes, operates on an ad hoc basis, as
“Americans’ communications are collected and viewed on a daily
basis on the certification of an analyst rather than a
warrant.”
This so-called “incidental” collection has very real world
implications, as the “content of your communications”
which has been obtained without a warrant is still accessible to
NSA workers for future use.
When asked to clarify if by content, he means a record that the
correspondence took place or the actual content itself, Snowden
said the answer is “both.”
“If I target for example an email address, for example under
FAA (FISA Amendments Avy) 702, and that email address sent
something to you, Joe America, the analyst gets it. All of it.
IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything. And it
gets saved for a very long time – and can be extended further
with waivers rather than warrants.”
Snowden argued that for those hoping to bolster their security
against invasive government snooping, encryption remains a viable
option, though with one major caveat.
“Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems
are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately,
endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently
find ways around it.”
Source Article from http://rt.com/news/snowden-edward-nsa-guardian-817/
Views: 0
Posted in 
