The CDC’s Profit Motive Connected to the Spread of Ebola

October 6th, 2014

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

This article will demonstrate that the CDC has positioned themselves to profit from the recent Ebola crisis. And if the crisis turns into an epidemic, all the better for the financial bottom line of the CDC. For the CDC to step in and recommend to President Obama to close all air travel from West Africa, both direct and indirect flights, would work against their potential profit making status.

This obvious conflict of interest places every American at risk. Before exploring this disturbing development, let’s trace the chain events leading up to this very disturbing and what some people will call, criminal event.

The Sheep Will Never Get It

As the news of the CDC’s profit motive and resulting conflict of interest begins to circulate, the sheep of this country will never believe it because of their self-imposed version of cognitive dissonance.

I was speaking with some friends recently, who are not very aware, nor are they very awake about the world they now inhabit. They subsequently asked me what I thought about the “Ebola scare” as they wanted to know if I thought America had anything to worry about? As I hesitated and began to choose my words carefully, they quickly cut me off and told me that the American people had nothing to worry about and the CDC has everything under control. I asked them where they had heard that and they said “CNN”.

The CDC Is Underplaying the Threat of Ebola, Why?

Yesterday, I published an article which clearly showed that the CDC knows full well that Ebola is airborne. And if it is airborne, even a dumbed-down moron knows that it cannot be contained. Here is the smoking gun proof that the CDC knows full well that Ebola is airborne and the CDC is convicted of deceit and fraud by using their own words against them.

The CDC released a very hastily prepared advisory entitled Interim Guidance about Ebola Virus Infection for Airline Flight Crews, Cleaning Personnel, and Cargo Personnel. This smoking gun document reveals that the CDC is clearly concerned about likely airborne contamination of Ebola. The CDC urges airline staff to provide surgical masks to potential Ebola victims in order “to reduce the number of droplets expelled into the air by talking, sneezing, or coughing”. The phrase “expelled into the air means that there is clearly the existence of the “airborne transmission of Ebola”.

Of course, the aforementioned facts do not constitute new revelations to the CDC and the NIH. On May 8, 2002, over 12 years ago, a National Institute of Health publication stated that airborne transmission of Ebola “cannot be ruled out”. And for 12 years, the CDC has been publishing lies to the contrary.

This policy is a tantamount admission that the CDC knows Ebola is airborne. However, if this was debated in public, the public would demand the cessation of travel from West Africa and this would reduce the chances of an Ebola outbreak in the United States. The CDC, as will be revealed in this article, has sufficient motive to not stop the spread of Ebola by any means possible.

“See the CDC sign in the background, it is designed to make you trust me. The CDC knows exactly what they are doing to the American people. We have it all under control”.

“First and foremost, I want the American people to know that our experts, here at the CDC and across our government, agree that the chances of an Ebola outbreak here in the United States are extremely low. We’ve been taking the necessary precautions, including working with countries in West Africa to increase screening at airports so that someone with the virus doesn’t get on a plane for the United States. In the unlikely event that someone with Ebola does reach our shores, we’ve taken new measures so that we’re prepared here at home. We’re working to help flight crews identify people who are sick, and more labs across our country now have the capacity to quickly test for the virus. We’re working with hospitals to make sure that they are prepared, and to ensure that our doctors, our nurses and our medical staff are trained, are ready, and are able to deal with a possible case safely”.

Well, Mr. President, would you like to explain the handling of the case in Dallas, the quarantining of the apartment of the victim? How about the ambulance that took Mr. Duncan to the hospital that we now know was NOT decontaminated for two days after the fact. And this was only done when an ambulance driver complained that he had been put at risk. And Mr. President, you are doing such a great job of identifying new cases that an individual could take the same route from Liberia to the United States without so much as undergoing a common sense 21 day quarantine. The same thing that happened in Dallas, happened in Payson, AZ.

“Drinking this will keep the Ebola away”.

The media, at almost all levels, is drinking the CDC’s Kool Aid. Here are 10 elements Mr. Mann’s wife published on their website as “proof” that her husband was never in danger of contracting Ebola or transmitting the virus.

The steps mentioned by the news report are not quarantine procedures. A true quarantine involves a complete isolation of an area. The yellow tape depicted in the Channel 12 news report is proof of an effective quarantine.

Mr. Mann, is not in a professional “self-imposed” quarantine unless of course he is being advised by Dr. Jed Clampett and his physicians assistant, Dr. Jethro while being assisted by Ellie Mae and Granny, because that is the level of quarantine procedures that we are witnessing in this case.

The Mann’s have stated that he had virtually no chance of contracting Ebola. However, on Mr. Mann’s website the following statement appears:

…Reminding them how important it was to keep clean on the outside to help reduce the spreading of the Ebola virus…

As this picture which calls into question that he did not have close contact with the people of Liberia:

I applaud Mr. Mann for his generous work and desire to help others. But given these circumstances and with what happened in Dallas with Mr. Duncan, I have to ask, “Where is the CDC? Why are they not investigating the health of Mr. Mann and his family”?

Are the residents from Payson supposed to feel better about Mr. Mann’s potential situation because he has yellow tape around his home? I have shown this story to people who know about quarantines and bio-containment procedures and they scoffed at this pseudoscience and were shocked by what I showed them. One expert asked out loud if Mr. Mann was in a quarantine situation when he boarded his plane in Liberia and flew to Brussels? Was Mr. Mann in quarantine when he flew from Brussels to Phoenix? And after he landed and was walking through Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, was he in a quarantine then? Mr. Mann could have become symptomatic at anytime in his return journey (e.g. while airborne) and hundreds of people could have become exposed and subsequently have become carriers.

The fact that Mr. Mann was ever allowed to board a plane, and not quarantined for 21 days, BEFORE boarding BOTH planes was reckless at best. Perhaps Mr. Mann did not know any better. However, we pay tax dollars to the CDC to know better. Again, where are they?

The circumstances of Mr. Mann’s trip and scores of people he could have possibly infected speaks to the fact that Obama is doing nothing to protect the American people. Mr. Mann may survive and I pray that he does, but what about all the other Mr. Mann’s who may not be so lucky and that is when our collective luck could run out as well.

The CDC has ulterior motives in the diagnosing and subsequent treatment of Ebola. First of all, the CDC is traded on Dunn and Bradstreet. This fact makes the CDC a for profit corporation.

Secondly, and as I have pointed out before, the CDC owns the patent on Ebola and all variances up to 70% of the variance. This means that because the CDC owns Ebola, they will receive a royalty every time a treatment is provided because of the alteration of their intellectual property rights.

These two facts mean that if the CDC moved to block the spread of Ebola, they would cut into their profit motive. On this point, there can be no argument. Are we supposed the humanitarian nature that the CDC would forgo their profit motive in order to serve the public good? Should we trust the CDC? What are the implications?

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/qHoGt-oGXZM/