Whistleblower Kids Expose Alleged Satanic Pedophile Ring In School/Church. They Need Our Help!

February 13th, 2015

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

The extraordinary child sexual abuse case of Gabriel and Alisa Dearman

Gabriel and Alisa Dearman are, allegedly, former Hampstead, Christ Church Primary School students. I say alleged because they are either presently students there or they are now past students, since Elena St-Onge, the author of the Collective-Evolution article, Whistleblower Kids Expose SATANIC PEDOPHILE RING in School/Church claims the childrens’ lives are in peril.

The story was taken down after only a short time. I cannot help feeling guilty about it since I appear to have been the first and only person to respond to the story shortly after it was posted. May reaction was probably not what the author was expecting and took it down. But that could not have been the real reason. My response was a rational one and not an emotional one. And, I must confess, not a response post facto but a priori – I didn’t watch the video before I posted a comment.

The children seem to be in the custody of other people not their parents. They aren’t with their mother, and are definitely not with their father, the alleged mastermind behind the ‘satanic ritual abuse’ the children allegedly suffered. I say alleged ‘satanic ritual abuse’ because the children puzzlingly do not show enough signs that they experienced as much abuse as they allege in their video testimonies.

As I watched the video – yes, I went back watched the video – of the children telling snippets of their story of alleged sexual abuse at the hands of teachers and parents of other school children, I grew increasingly horrified until I was suffering the effects of having been traumatised. I was traumatised by what I’d heard. But something bothered me about the childrens’ testimonies. And now I’d like to explain what that is.

According to Parents Protect, the UK site, a list of symptoms should be looked for when determining whether or not a child has experienced sexual abuse. I was personally surprised by the list, and when I recall them here you may be as surprised as I. I don’t need to state what is involved in child sexual abuse, as that seems superfluous. What to watch out for:

Acting out in an inappropriate sexual way with toys or objects
This was not shown or talked about in the video. Perhaps eight and nine year olds are too old for toys? Gabriel and Alisa seemed to be too old for this. But it probably was discussed by the doctor who examined them.

Nightmares, sleeping problems
The children did not mention on the video they had either of these. It was not mentioned by the interviewers. The children did not sound like they were suffering either of these – they were perky and bright-eyed, most of the time. They did appear sleepy, as thought they were experiencing sleeping problems. They seemed well rested.

Becoming withdrawn or very clingy
The children did not show signs of being withdrawn, quite the opposite in fact. And they did not appear to be clingy, especially Alisa. Being energetic about telling their story dismissed any suggestion of being withdrawn.

Becoming unusually secretive
The children were not secretive – they were the opposite.

Sudden unexplained personality changes, mood swings and seeming insecure
The children do not show signs of personality changes – they were consistently the same. They did not show signs of mood swings, they were reasonable and calm. And they were far from seeming insecure. They were confident they’d been abused.

Regressing to younger behaviours, e.g. bedwetting
If any of this was occurring, it was not mentioned on the video. Given that many of the interviews were conducted with the children in their bedclothes and sitting on the beds they slept in, it did not seem the case.

Unaccountable fear of particular places or people
The children do not exhibit signs of fear of anyone in particular. Their ‘fear’ of the father, if there was any, was not obvious. Elena St-Onge claims the childrens’ lives are in peril, yet the children did not appear to be suffering from fear of anything.

Outburst of anger
The children never once exhibited signs of anger over having been sexually abused. Their testimonies were, in fact, devoid of anger. They never once had an angry outburst while telling of their experience, and this really threw me. They were not angry about what had happened to them – the interviewers were.

Changes in eating habits
One interview event occurred in a fast-food restaurant. This suggests their eating habits were unaffected by their experience.

New adult words for body parts and no obvious source
The children did not show signs of having an ‘adult’ vocabulary for body parts. In fact, they consistently used vocabulary for children of this age. Gabriel used the term ‘pussy’ once to refer to the vagina. This is hardly a new ‘adult’ word for a female body part.

Talk of a new, older friend and unexplained money or gifts
Now this was interesting, and puzzling. The children talk about getting sweets for obediently submitting to the sexual abuse. Perhaps this is unusual. But the talk about money being exchanged for babies, was intriguing to say the least.

Self-harm (cutting, burning, or other harmful activities)
There was no sign or indication the children engaged in self-harm, of any sort.

Physical signs, such as, unexplained soreness or bruises around genitals or mouth, sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy
There were hints that the children experienced bruising – Gabriel mentions being assaulted with a dildo (but doesn’t mention whether it is an electric vibrator), saying the abuser had put in his rectum so far that he could feel it in his stomach. He also mentions bleeding after multiple events of penetration. But there was no indication that ‘oral’ sex was ever engaged in, so no issues with the mouth. And no STDs. Which is puzzling because Gabriel describes a male teacher having signs of an STD.

Running away
The children had not run away – they were being taken away by others. But they themselves had not run away. In fact, there was no indication from the children that they were eager to ‘run away’ from the sexual abuse. The children seemed unconcerned – Alisa especially – that they had told people their teachers and students’ parents had abused them. They did not seem eager to get away from all that abuse.

Not wanting to be alone with a particular child or young person
There was no indication from the children in the video that they were experiencing this. They seemed quite happy in others’ company, and did not suggest they were opposed to being with any other student at their school.

Parents Protect warns that physical signs of sexual abuse are rare. This seems at odds with what is being claimed by Elena St-Onge and others involved in disclosing that satanic ritual abuse is rampant and that the Dearman children are just two victims among thousands of child victims. Parents Protect suggest parents take their child to a doctor for clarification, if not confirmation, that the signs they are seeing are signs of sexual abuse. They lists some physical signs:

• Pain, discoloration, bleeding or discharges in genitals, anus or mouth
• Persistent or recurring pain during urination and bowel movements
• Wetting and soiling accidents unrelated to toilet training

Now these physical signs are very interesting indeed, with respect to the children. Because few of them are mentioned in the video, by the children or the interviewers. Gabriel is the only one of the two to mention some pain and bleeding resulting from anal penetration. However, few if any of the other symptoms are mentioned. As Parents Protect say, physical signs are rare. But would that still be the case with the amount and consistency of sexual abuse these children experienced? And they’d experienced it as recently as the day before the interview – from what I could tell. And they could expect more the following day, the Wednesday, since this was the peak day of sexual abuse by teachers and parents during the week.

Can people now see why I responded to this story the way I did? It raises a number of questions that are not answered by Elena St-Onge, or anyone else involved in this case. Why do these children not show more signs of satanic ritual abuse given they experienced it every day? Why are there few signs of trauma associated with their experience given the amount and extent of the abuse experienced?

You’ll notice I did not say the children had not been sexually abused. According to Elena St-Onge, ‘The mother had long noticed signs of unhappiness, suppressed anger and stress in her children. What she could not imagine was the underlying cause, which her children could not speak of because they were threatened to be killed if they spoke out. It is only in August, while on holiday with them, that she learned about what was really going on. The mother explained that on one occasion, Alisa’s friend from school came to play at their house and asked her if she was going to “have sex with the children.” When Alisa answered ‘no,’ her friend asked why they don’t tell about what was going on in school. Alisa then reminded her friend about the threat of being killed.’

Why were none of the ‘signs of unhappiness, supressed anger and stress’ obvious in the video? This is puzzling, but not unexpected since Parent Protects say the physical signs of sexual abuse are rare. The mother says her children could not speak of it because they were threatened with death if they spoke out. Well, the children do not seem concerned about it on the video – they speak freely and uninhibited about their experience. They were obviously not that fearful of speaking out about it on the video.

How did the mother learn of the childrens’ experience? St-Onge says it was when the mother and the children were on holidays. But in the next sentence St-Onge suggests the mother overheard a conversation between Alisa and a school friend that piqued her curiosity. Alisa says ‘no’ to the school friend when asked if she will have sex with the children. Why does the other school friend talk about it if they’ve been threatened with death? Doesn’t the friend know this if she is also a victim of the sexual abuse? I mean, why is Alisa and Gabriel (presumably) the only two to know about the death threat?

Alisa’s school friend asks her if she will have sex with the other children. What? We are being told that the children are the victims of adult sexual abuse and are regularly subjected to sexual abuse by teachers and parents of other school children, yet here is Alisa’s school friend talking about sex with other school children and doesn’t mention the teachers and parents. Why not? Wouldn’t it have been more accurate to have said sex with the teachers? Or sex with the teachers and parents? This is highly puzzling. The children never mention anything to the mother; nothing about the sexual abuse. And never speak of the pain and suffering they are experiencing, which causes bleeding from the anus, in Gabriel’s testimony. We assume it is the same for Alisa.

There is no mention of the mother ever taking the children to the doctor on suspicion the children were being sexually abused. Why not? Perhaps it is as Parent Protects suggest about the signs of sexual abuse being rare. But with all the abuse these children have been experiencing, you’d think the mother would’ve noticed something? But, no. St-Onge says in the next paragraph that the mother reported the crimes to the police a few weeks later. The holiday was in August, she reported the crimes in September. However, she never noticed a thing. And never took the children to the doctor on suspicion of sexual abuse.

There are so many unanswered questions in this story that defy logic. I have already said, I am not saying the children were not sexually abused. There is evidence of sexual abuse. This is not in question. I am not disputing it. What I am saying is that there is a lot of oddness in this story. How could the perpetrators of this extreme account of alleged satanic ritual abuse, and I mean extreme because it’s not just two children and a handful of abusers. There are many perpetrators. And so many children – Gabriel says every school in Hampstead is involved. How could this have gone on without anyone, in a big city like London, not notice that something unusual was happening to the children in these schools?

St-Onge claims there is a cover-up. If so, it’s staggering. But other children have said something about their abuse at the hands of their teachers. St-Onge says the children were ignored. This was possible, she claims, because the childrens’ parents were also among the abusers. And not just the parents, the childrens’ teachers too. It gets worse. The local police were also involved in silencing the children, if I may say it like this. So were child services. With all this pressure on the children from the adult abusers, surely the physical, if not the psychological signs of sexual abuse would be obvious not invisible. But apparently not. The children have borne the pressure well; they’ve been graceful under the pressure.

The police, presumably those in the cover-up, believe otherwise. The children, the police allege, confabulated the story after seeing the movie The Mask of Zorro. However, for the children to have confabulated the story after seeing a movie, they would have had to have engaged in some pretty serious sexual acts to do so. This idea that experiences like this are confabulated from seeing movies (and other popular culture) is based on a theory called ‘false memory syndrome’. False memory syndrome, the proponents of it, claim that this happens all the time. That everyone experiences this at one time or another.

The problem with false memory syndrome is that it is a theory. It claims that everyone who sees a popular culture artefact will remember it forever, because it is unconsciously retained – even if you can’t recall ever seeing it. The person then unconsciously decoupages the material into real life experiences. This theory is used to explain alien abduction, for example. But it cannot be scientifically demonstrated that everyone who sees a cultural artefact like the images in a movie will remember them forever. It cannot be demonstrated that everyone unconsciously decoupages this material into real life experiences and then gets confused about reality. If this were true, then everyone you meet would be experiencing something that wasn’t really happening and acting schizophrenically.

There is no indication from the children that they are doing this. I wonder if anyone, the police especially, asked the children if they had ever seen the movie The Mask of Zorro. I bet they never did. I bet they consulted or were offered advice from someone who knew about false memory syndrome and suggested this the explanation for the childrens’ disclosure. And it might have been due to seeing the childrens’ video testimony and having a similar reaction as I did – why don’t the children show signs of being sexually abused? Given the extent and consistency of the abuse.

This is a very difficult story to listen to and think about. It is, quite frankly, traumatising. But what should our response be to a story that defies logic? Signing a petition to reunite children is mother is one thing, but will it have any effect on the alleged satanic ritual abuse? I think there’ll be none. If it is as convoluted and entrenched as Elena St-Onge and others argue. Calling people to get up and protest about it is also something that can be done. But in a world like ours, changing peoples’ minds and behaviour is easier said than done.

There is a lot more to be said about this important but disturbing story. And I apologise if I influenced it being taken down. I was concerned initially about the way St-Onge wrote this story, but that is writing and journalistic intent. It is very difficult to draw strong conclusions when the story is partially a personal viewpoint, confused and presenting few of the facts, glossing the rest; providing an incomplete picture of what went on. And this is yet another story. This was my reaction. I hope the story is re-posted, and people get a chance to read it, think about it and how they can get involved and discuss it openly and without fear.

Glad to see it was reposted.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Collective-evolution/~3/4ZJ651yuoQ4/