David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker

October 12th, 2015

Awake Goy

October 11, 2015

Comments for “David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker “

Henrique said (October 11, 2015):

Irving comes off as another “Right-hand path” disinformationist. You have to understand that the esoteric underworld is not unidimensional; they got “specialized” sects pushing different things.

The Left-hand is for Satanists, nihilists, Aloyzius Fozdyke-type characters. The Right-hand path ( now somewhat in the background ) is the sect for “orderly” people, traditional aristocrats, people who value “obedience” over everything else.

As Jews tended to be outcasts, they generally sympathize with the Left-hand ( although ultra-nationalists in Israel have many traces of the right-hand – perhaps why Fozdyke hates them ).

It’s the philosophical dialectic Apollo ( Order, righteousness ) X Dionysus ( Wine, Orgies – the darker recesses of the mind, subjectivity ). People like Oliver, Evola, Guenon, the old eugenicists, Yockey, etc. are all very alike. They say, basically, that modern society is doomed because the masses “lost the notion of authority, of the order/obey dynamics”. This in a sense, supposedly, turned them into a chaotic, redundant, meaningless mob, with no purpose other than self-destruction. And they all point to the nineteenth century as the beginning of all this in a big scale ( when the Communist manifesto was written, the masses were slowly becoming literate, etc. ). A formula, that’s what History is.

There’s a lot of truth in both “paths”, esoterists always cloak their interests behind self-evident truths. But one thing seems clear: even if Germans had won the war, the future for ordinary Germans would be a nightmare. The Order-worshippers would have turned Europe into Brave New World, right then. “Master-race” was as much a slogan as “indispensable, exceptional, manifest destiny”.

In the end, obviously, both sides work for the same capstone. Order out of chaos. Chaos to destroy people psychologically enough so they can’t resist the new Order about to be enforced worldwide.

C said (October 11, 2015):

Irving is undoubtedly a very courageous man, but he strikes me as something of an unquestioning Anglo-supremacist. British Hitler apologists are fond of saying that Hitler never had any quarrel with the British Empire – as if this vindicates him, when surely it does nothing of the sort.

As you have pointed out on many occasions, the British Empire was a Rothschild operation and steeped in Freemasonry and occultism from the start. Recently, on another alternative site I saw a talk Irving gave many years ago in Canada, in which he parroted the British Masonic media line that the Americans armed the IRA.

In fact there is now irrefutable proof that British intelligence armed, funded and controlled all sides in the Northern Ireland conflict as part of a divide and conquer strategy.

JG said (October 11, 2015):

David Irving was a threat to the fabricated and establishment propagated history of WW2 and had to be silenced. The uncovering of one lie often leads to more unveiling of more lies and then the house of cards fall. Lies have to be protected in order to stand. In a metaphorical sense political and historical truths are in secured vaults which only the skilled and learned scholars like Irving know the combinations to.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at